Aadarsh

Last seen for boys in 2024 at #12,349

Peak · boys
2014 · 18 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
251
since 2000

Aadarsh over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Aadarsh has never cracked the top 5,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202009peak #5,066, 2014boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025—
2024#12,3495
2023#12,2395
2022#8,9908
2021—
2020#8,0679
2019#5,81315
2018#7,61710
2017#5,78815
2016#7,15711
2015#5,74615
2014#5,06618
2013#6,60312
2012#6,62612
2011#9,6007
2010—
2009#5,55416
2008#6,39313
2007#6,26213
2006#5,78114
2005#7,09610
2004#6,52011
2003#6,71510
2002#6,52210
2001#8,3397
2000#10,3495
1999—
1998—
1997—
1996—
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
2000

The first year at least five boys were named Aadarsh! It came in at #10,349, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 2010, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.

Where Aadarsh is popular in 2009

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMNIllinois: #1,382 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 14,510 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Aadarsh, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Illinois#1,382 · 1 in 14,510

Best ever in a state: #1,382 in Illinois, 2009.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Illinois#1,38251 in 14,510
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Aadarsh
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
Rise & fade · boys
14 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 2000
  • Peaked 2014 at #5,066 (18 births)
  • Births halved by 2020, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 106,715
  • Highest: 1 in 106,715 boys born in 2014 were named Aadarsh (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 344,578 boys born in 2024 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 45.8% of all boys named Aadarsh (115) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
2000s109#5,554 (2009)#6,953
2010s115#5,066 (2014)#6,668
2020s27#8,067 (2020)#10,411

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Aadarsh in 2009

boys
#5,554
16 births · 1 in 123,973 boys

Top boys' names in 2009

  1. #1Jacob21,204
  2. #2Ethan19,858
  3. #3Michael18,964
  4. #4Alexander18,254
  5. #5William17,937
  6. #6Joshua17,671
  7. #7Daniel17,564
  8. #8Jayden17,316
  9. #9Noah17,262
  10. #10Christopher16,368
  11. #5,554Aadarsh16
More about 2009

boys

1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 123,973 of them was named Aadarsh, which outranked 61.8% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Aadarsh
  1. #5,334Zuhair17
  2. #5,334Zyien17
  3. #5,334Zymarion17
  4. #5,554Aadarsh16
  5. #5,554Abdel16
  6. #5,554Abid16
  7. #5,554Abigail16
  8. #5,800Aarion15
  9. #5,800Aarron15
  10. #5,800Aashrith15

Tied with 245 names at #5,554; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
  1. ↑ 951Knox#1,655 → #704
  2. ↑ 510Kellan#1,133 → #623
  3. ↑ 462Jaxen#1,329 → #867
  4. ↑ 422Bentley#936 → #514
  5. ↑ 354Archer#1,037 → #683
Fallers
  1. ↓ 493Yurem#995 → #1,488
  2. ↓ 222Cordell#786 → #1,008
  3. ↓ 212Shamar#926 → #1,138
  4. ↓ 201Trevin#797 → #998
  5. ↓ 198Glenn#865 → #1,063

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2009 →