Aamir
Last seen for girls in 2013 at #14,582 · #2,035 for boys in 2025, 73 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2015 · 144 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,691since 1974
Aamir over time
Rank among boys' names. Aamir has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,035 | 73 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,921 | 82 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,744 | 94 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,504 | 120 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,546 | 113 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,398 | 124 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,634 | 100 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,299 | 140 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,300 | 139 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,339 | 133 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,252 | 144 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,432 | 116 | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #1,285 | 135 |
| 2012 | — | #1,439 | 115 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,730 | 85 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,881 | 76 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,889 | 76 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,792 | 83 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,728 | 86 | |
| 2006 | — | #2,881 | 39 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,129 | 57 | |
| 2004 | — | #2,569 | 42 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,922 | 33 | |
| 2002 | — | #2,337 | 44 | |
| 2001 | — | #2,742 | 34 | |
| 2000 | — | #2,525 | 37 | |
| 1999 | — | #3,279 | 24 | |
| 1998 | — | #3,092 | 25 | |
| 1997 | — | #2,546 | 31 | |
| 1996 | — | #2,679 | 28 | |
| 1995 | — | #2,685 | 27 | |
| 1994 | — | #3,326 | 20 | |
| 1993 | — | #2,865 | 24 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,253 | 33 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,606 | 26 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,607 | 16 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,446 | 16 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,705 | 13 | |
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | #4,130 | 10 | |
| 1985 | — | #3,070 | 15 | |
| 1984 | — | #4,973 | 7 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | #3,601 | 11 | |
| 1980 | — | #4,940 | 7 | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | #5,059 | 6 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,123 | 6 | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | #4,634 | 6 | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Aamir! It came in at #4,634, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1975–1976, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Aamir is popular in 2013
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maryland#606 · 1 in 3,926
- Georgia#677 · 1 in 4,474
- Michigan#706 · 1 in 5,332
- Indiana#873 · 1 in 7,130
- Illinois#890 · 1 in 7,323
Best ever in a state: #430 in Maryland, 2017.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | #606 | 7 | 1 in 3,926 |
| Georgia | #677 | 12 | 1 in 4,474 |
| Michigan | #706 | 9 | 1 in 5,332 |
| Indiana | #873 | 5 | 1 in 7,130 |
| Illinois | #890 | 9 | 1 in 7,323 |
| New York | #946 | 13 | 1 in 7,883 |
| Ohio | #946 | 7 | 1 in 8,525 |
| Virginia | #946 | 5 | 1 in 8,344 |
| New Jersey | #975 | 5 | 1 in 8,305 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,003 | 6 | 1 in 9,959 |
| Florida | #1,184 | 8 | 1 in 11,675 |
| California | #2,006 | 7 | 1 in 32,432 |
| Texas | #2,288 | 5 | 1 in 36,051 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Aamir
- 114 spots since 2024 (#1,921 → #2,035)
- 637 spots since 2020 (#1,398 → #2,035)
- 783 spots since 2015 (#1,252 → #2,035)
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2015 at #1,252 (144 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 12,973 boys born in 2018 were named Aamir (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 23,398 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,252 in 2015, was only 1 in 13,311 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 44.0% of all boys named Aamir (1,183) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 18 | #4,634 (1974) | #4,939 |
| 1980s | 99 | #3,070 (1985) | #4,386 |
| 1990s | 254 | #2,253 (1992) | #2,894 |
| 2000s | 531 | #1,728 (2007) | #2,351 |
| 2010s | 1,183 | #1,252 (2015) | #1,459 |
| 2020s | 606 | #1,398 (2020) | #1,691 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Aamir in 2013
Top girls' names in 2013
Top boys' names in 2013
More about 2013
girls
1,754,746 girls got a published name in 2013; 1 in 292,458 of them was named Aamir, which outranked 24.4% of the 19,279 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #13,150Zyara7
- #13,150Zyia7
- #13,150Zykira7
- #14,582Aamir6
- #14,582Aadi6
- #14,582Aaditri6
- #14,582Aadvika6
- #16,547Aadrika5
- #16,547Aahna5
- #16,547Aalanah5
Tied with 1,964 names at #14,582; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,891,581 boys got a published name in 2013; 1 in 14,012 of them was named Aamir, which outranked 90.9% of the 14,070 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,277Lloyd136
- #1,277Lyndon136
- #1,277Talan136
- #1,285Aamir135
- #1,285Aries135
- #1,285Cristobal135
- #1,285Diesel135
- #1,291Kolt134
- #1,291Presley134
- #1,291Reynaldo134
Tied with 5 names at #1,285; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.