Aastha

#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births

Peak · girls
2005 · 36 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
272
since 1998

Aastha over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Aastha has never cracked the top 3,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202000peak #3,942, 2005girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#13,2086
2024—
2023—
2022—
2021—
2020—
2019—
2018#13,7936
2017—
2016#12,8767
2015#13,0067
2014#13,0697
2013#16,5475
2012#14,9626
2011#8,19614
2010#7,21717
2009#6,54420
2008#7,40817
2007#9,53912
2006#7,48216
2005#3,94236
2004#4,09334
2003#4,53628
2002#13,5956
2001#10,1029
2000#9,16310
1999—
1998#9,2609
1997—
1996—
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1998

The first year at least five girls were named Aastha! It came in at #9,260, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1999, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Aastha is popular in 2000

No state had 5 or more girls named Aastha in 2000, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.

See more about Aastha
Momentum · girls
Brand new
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #13,208)
Rise & fade · girls
7 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1998
  • Peaked 2005 at #3,942 (36 births)
  • Births halved by 2006, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 51,329
  • Highest: 1 in 51,329 girls born in 2005 were named Aastha (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 69.1% of all girls named Aastha (188) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1990s9#9,260 (1998)#9,260
2000s188#3,942 (2005)#7,640
2010s69#7,217 (2010)#12,458
2020s6#13,208 (2025)#13,208

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Aastha in 2000

girls
#9,163
10 births · 1 in 181,604 girls

Top girls' names in 2000

  1. #1Emily25,959
  2. #2Hannah23,087
  3. #3Madison19,968
  4. #4Ashley18,000
  5. #5Sarah17,715
  6. #6Alexis17,631
  7. #7Samantha17,265
  8. #8Jessica15,711
  9. #9Elizabeth15,117
  10. #10Taylor15,080
  11. #9,163Aastha10
More about 2000

girls

1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 181,604 of them was named Aastha, which outranked 48.1% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Aastha
  1. #8,534Zeena11
  2. #8,534Ziana11
  3. #8,534Zynia11
  4. #9,163Aastha10
  5. #9,163Aaliyha10
  6. #9,163Aashna10
  7. #9,163Aayushi10
  8. #9,874Aailyah9
  9. #9,874Aalia9
  10. #9,874Aaminah9

Tied with 710 names at #9,163; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1999
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,528Laisha#3,509 → #981
  2. ↑ 2,131Litzy#2,527 → #396
  3. ↑ 2,096Cielo#2,991 → #895
  4. ↑ 1,864Yamilet#2,703 → #839
  5. ↑ 1,775Nyah#2,567 → #792
Fallers
  1. ↓ 560Tatyanna#951 → #1,511
  2. ↓ 529Jailene#506 → #1,035
  3. ↓ 431Shanice#727 → #1,158
  4. ↓ 384Chantal#921 → #1,305
  5. ↓ 348Infant#658 → #1,006

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2000 →