Aastha

#13,208 for girls in 2025, 6 births

Peak · girls
2005 · 36 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
272
since 1998

Aastha over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Aastha has never cracked the top 3,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202009peak #3,942, 2005girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#13,2086
2024—
2023—
2022—
2021—
2020—
2019—
2018#13,7936
2017—
2016#12,8767
2015#13,0067
2014#13,0697
2013#16,5475
2012#14,9626
2011#8,19614
2010#7,21717
2009#6,54420
2008#7,40817
2007#9,53912
2006#7,48216
2005#3,94236
2004#4,09334
2003#4,53628
2002#13,5956
2001#10,1029
2000#9,16310
1999—
1998#9,2609
1997—
1996—
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1998

The first year at least five girls were named Aastha! It came in at #9,260, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1999, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Aastha is popular in 2009

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #1,197 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,665 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #3,619 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 43,657 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Aastha, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Jersey#1,197 · 1 in 7,665
  2. California#3,619 · 1 in 43,657

Best ever in a state: #676 in New Jersey, 2005.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Jersey#1,19751 in 7,665
California#3,61951 in 43,657
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Aastha
Momentum · girls
Brand new
  • 202 spots since 2015 (#13,006 → #13,208)
Rise & fade · girls
7 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1998
  • Peaked 2005 at #3,942 (36 births)
  • Births halved by 2006, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 51,329
  • Highest: 1 in 51,329 girls born in 2005 were named Aastha (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 267,878 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 69.1% of all girls named Aastha (188) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1990s9#9,260 (1998)#9,260
2000s188#3,942 (2005)#7,640
2010s69#7,217 (2010)#12,458
2020s6#13,208 (2025)#13,208

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Aastha in 2009

girls
#6,544
20 births · 1 in 91,856 girls

Top girls' names in 2009

  1. #1Isabella22,321
  2. #2Emma17,910
  3. #3Olivia17,444
  4. #4Sophia16,951
  5. #5Ava15,877
  6. #6Emily15,366
  7. #7Madison15,257
  8. #8Abigail14,401
  9. #9Chloe11,922
  10. #10Mia11,438
  11. #6,544Aastha20
More about 2009

girls

1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 91,856 of them was named Aastha, which outranked 67.6% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Aastha
  1. #6,317Zyaira21
  2. #6,317Zyan21
  3. #6,317Zyanya21
  4. #6,544Aastha20
  5. #6,544Aaleah20
  6. #6,544Aaralynn20
  7. #6,544Aarohi20
  8. #6,811Abrar19
  9. #6,811Abri19
  10. #6,811Adama19

Tied with 266 names at #6,544; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,137Taraji#5,013 → #876
  2. ↑ 2,107Bristol#2,773 → #666
  3. ↑ 836Analia#1,167 → #331
  4. ↑ 773Harlow#1,677 → #904
  5. ↑ 610Maliah#1,405 → #795
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,450Dayami#754 → #2,204
  2. ↓ 953Mareli#723 → #1,676
  3. ↓ 773Mylie#839 → #1,612
  4. ↓ 517Marely#334 → #851
  5. ↓ 515Hillary#722 → #1,237

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2009 →