Abigail
#41 for girls in 2025, 4,941 births · Last seen for boys in 2023 at #8,255
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 15,756 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 37 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 413,263since 1880
Abigail over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #41 | 4,941 | — | |
| 2024 | #32 | 5,535 | — | |
| 2023 | #31 | 5,687 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #24 | 6,306 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #17 | 6,993 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #12 | 7,917 | — | |
| 2019 | #11 | 9,196 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #11 | 9,879 | #6,345 | 13 |
| 2017 | #10 | 10,645 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #8 | 11,796 | #7,605 | 10 |
| 2015 | #7 | 12,422 | #7,491 | 10 |
| 2014 | #8 | 12,114 | #6,307 | 13 |
| 2013 | #8 | 12,429 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #7 | 12,730 | #6,306 | 13 |
| 2011 | #7 | 13,266 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #7 | 14,257 | #8,139 | 9 |
| 2009 | #8 | 14,401 | #5,554 | 16 |
| 2008 | #8 | 15,088 | #4,714 | 20 |
| 2007 | #8 | 15,476 | #3,793 | 27 |
| 2006 | #6 | 15,633 | #5,303 | 16 |
| 2005 | #4 | 15,756 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #6 | 15,436 | #1,502 | 89 |
| 2003 | #6 | 15,932 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | #7 | 15,303 | #4,044 | 20 |
| 2001 | #8 | 14,807 | #4,121 | 19 |
| 2000 | #14 | 13,094 | #4,573 | 16 |
| 1999 | #18 | 11,686 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #18 | 11,100 | #3,390 | 22 |
| 1997 | #26 | 9,630 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #32 | 8,604 | #3,830 | 17 |
| 1995 | #36 | 7,825 | #4,791 | 12 |
| 1994 | #42 | 7,243 | #4,803 | 12 |
| 1993 | #67 | 5,185 | #4,697 | 12 |
| 1992 | #86 | 3,988 | #3,748 | 16 |
| 1991 | #92 | 3,799 | #4,231 | 13 |
| 1990 | #90 | 3,719 | #3,058 | 20 |
| 1989 | #94 | 3,405 | #2,784 | 22 |
| 1988 | #118 | 2,376 | #4,450 | 10 |
| 1987 | #138 | 2,001 | #3,521 | 13 |
| 1986 | #143 | 1,996 | #3,131 | 15 |
| 1985 | #153 | 1,848 | #3,599 | 12 |
| 1984 | #154 | 1,844 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | #151 | 1,909 | #3,411 | 12 |
| 1982 | #157 | 1,886 | #4,593 | 8 |
| 1981 | #156 | 1,816 | #4,961 | 7 |
| 1980 | #176 | 1,577 | #3,615 | 11 |
| 1979 | #213 | 1,226 | — | |
| 1978 | #242 | 1,010 | — | |
| 1977 | #298 | 794 | — | |
| 1976 | #278 | 827 | #4,935 | 6 |
| 1975 | #353 | 615 | — | |
| 1974 | #357 | 606 | — | |
| 1973 | #413 | 479 | — | |
| 1972 | #468 | 393 | — | |
| 1971 | #491 | 392 | — | |
| 1970 | #526 | 362 | — | |
| 1969 | #590 | 281 | — | |
| 1968 | #592 | 263 | — | |
| 1967 | #609 | 244 | — | |
| 1966 | #710 | 191 | — | |
| 1965 | #679 | 209 | — | |
| 1964 | #655 | 244 | — | |
| 1963 | #633 | 255 | — | |
| 1962 | #617 | 264 | — | |
| 1961 | #680 | 232 | — | |
| 1960 | #673 | 228 | — | |
| 1959 | #698 | 206 | — | |
| 1958 | #712 | 192 | — | |
| 1957 | #731 | 187 | — | |
| 1956 | #694 | 190 | — | |
| 1955 | #700 | 180 | — | |
| 1954 | #773 | 147 | — | |
| 1953 | #705 | 169 | — | |
| 1952 | #723 | 151 | — | |
| 1951 | #749 | 137 | — | |
| 1950 | #824 | 112 | — | |
| 1949 | #823 | 113 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,041 | 72 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,003 | 78 | — | |
| 1946 | #953 | 76 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,080 | 53 | — | |
| 1944 | #1,046 | 56 | — | |
| 1943 | #996 | 63 | — | |
| 1942 | #1,137 | 48 | — | |
| 1941 | #1,184 | 40 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,035 | 48 | — | |
| 1939 | #974 | 53 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,007 | 50 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,063 | 45 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,186 | 36 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,162 | 37 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,317 | 30 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,262 | 32 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,346 | 30 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,421 | 27 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,569 | 25 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,306 | 33 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,210 | 40 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,404 | 33 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,483 | 30 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,296 | 37 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,503 | 31 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,536 | 29 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,765 | 24 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,375 | 33 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,393 | 31 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,566 | 26 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,110 | 41 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,167 | 37 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,094 | 38 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,601 | 14 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,055 | 24 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,031 | 18 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,219 | 12 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,135 | 13 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,142 | 12 | — | |
| 1906 | #965 | 15 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,162 | 11 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,364 | 8 | — | |
| 1903 | #760 | 20 | — | |
| 1902 | #818 | 18 | — | |
| 1901 | #918 | 13 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,008 | 14 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,278 | 7 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,047 | 11 | — | |
| 1897 | #826 | 15 | — | |
| 1896 | #843 | 15 | — | |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 | — | |
| 1894 | #850 | 13 | — | |
| 1893 | #630 | 21 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #940 | 9 | — | |
| 1889 | #567 | 20 | — | |
| 1888 | #593 | 18 | — | |
| 1887 | #633 | 13 | — | |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #583 | 13 | — | |
| 1883 | #579 | 11 | — | |
| 1882 | #493 | 14 | — | |
| 1881 | #623 | 8 | — | |
| 1880 | #492 | 12 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Abigail was already there! It came in at #492, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1899, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Abigail is popular in 2006
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Maine#2 · 1 in 40
- Montana#2 · 1 in 53
- Utah#2 · 1 in 83
- Vermont#3 · 1 in 40
- Idaho#3 · 1 in 68
Best ever in a state: #2 in Maine, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maine | #2 | 106 | 1 in 40 |
| Montana | #2 | 57 | 1 in 53 |
| Utah | #2 | 226 | 1 in 83 |
| Idaho | #3 | 103 | 1 in 68 |
| Kansas | #3 | 200 | 1 in 69 |
| Maryland | #3 | 291 | 1 in 86 |
| Vermont | #3 | 37 | 1 in 40 |
| Virginia | #3 | 480 | 1 in 79 |
| Missouri | #4 | 384 | 1 in 77 |
| North Carolina | #4 | 528 | 1 in 89 |
| Oklahoma | #4 | 210 | 1 in 83 |
| West Virginia | #4 | 134 | 1 in 52 |
| Arkansas | #5 | 167 | 1 in 75 |
| Colorado | #5 | 259 | 1 in 98 |
| Kentucky | #5 | 292 | 1 in 70 |
| Tennessee | #5 | 458 | 1 in 69 |
| Illinois | #6 | 676 | 1 in 101 |
| Indiana | #6 | 406 | 1 in 81 |
| Louisiana | #6 | 221 | 1 in 91 |
| Ohio | #6 | 707 | 1 in 81 |
| Oregon | #6 | 195 | 1 in 85 |
| South Carolina | #6 | 196 | 1 in 97 |
| Wisconsin | #6 | 325 | 1 in 77 |
| Wyoming | #6 | 23 | 1 in 58 |
| Georgia | #7 | 461 | 1 in 117 |
| Iowa | #7 | 189 | 1 in 74 |
| Massachusetts | #7 | 424 | 1 in 67 |
| Minnesota | #7 | 342 | 1 in 79 |
| Nebraska | #7 | 113 | 1 in 75 |
| New Hampshire | #7 | 83 | 1 in 54 |
| Pennsylvania | #7 | 678 | 1 in 82 |
| Texas | #7 | 1,385 | 1 in 120 |
| Rhode Island | #8 | 57 | 1 in 62 |
| Washington | #8 | 301 | 1 in 102 |
| Alabama | #9 | 213 | 1 in 96 |
| California | #9 | 1,482 | 1 in 158 |
| Connecticut | #9 | 171 | 1 in 80 |
| South Dakota | #9 | 45 | 1 in 71 |
| Alaska | #10 | 28 | 1 in 85 |
| District of Columbia | #10 | 33 | 1 in 100 |
| Michigan | #10 | 457 | 1 in 103 |
| New Mexico | #10 | 74 | 1 in 114 |
| Delaware | #11 | 40 | 1 in 79 |
| Florida | #11 | 729 | 1 in 122 |
| North Dakota | #11 | 36 | 1 in 71 |
| Arizona | #12 | 284 | 1 in 135 |
| New Jersey | #13 | 382 | 1 in 107 |
| New York | #13 | 724 | 1 in 133 |
| Nevada | #14 | 97 | 1 in 129 |
| Mississippi | #17 | 96 | 1 in 130 |
| Hawaii | #20 | 28 | 1 in 129 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Abigail
- 9 spots since 2024 (#32 → #41)
- 29 spots since 2020 (#12 → #41)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#7 → #41)
- Biggest jump: 278 spots in 1893 (#908 → #630)
- Biggest drop: 604 spots in 1904 (#760 → #1,364)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2005 at #4 (15,756 births)
- Births halved by 2021, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: 17 yrs · run 2001–2017
- Top 100: 37 yrs · run 1989–2025
- Top 1,000: 102 yrs · run 1949–2025
- Highest: 1 in 115 girls born in 2003 were named Abigail (0.87%)
- Latest: 1 in 325 girls born in 2025 (0.31%)
- Its best rank, #4 in 2005, was only 1 in 117 (0.85%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 36.5% of all girls named Abigail (150,926) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 133 | #492 (1880) | #588 |
| 1890s | 128 | #630 (1893) | #898 |
| 1900s | 136 | #760 (1903) | #1,049 |
| 1910s | 270 | #1,031 (1911) | #1,236 |
| 1920s | 322 | #1,210 (1928) | #1,431 |
| 1930s | 365 | #974 (1939) | #1,231 |
| 1940s | 647 | #823 (1949) | #1,030 |
| 1950s | 1,671 | #694 (1956) | #731 |
| 1960s | 2,411 | #590 (1969) | #644 |
| 1970s | 6,704 | #213 (1979) | #364 |
| 1980s | 20,658 | #94 (1989) | #144 |
| 1990s | 72,779 | #18 (1999) | #51 |
| 2000s | 150,926 | #4 (2005) | #8 |
| 2010s | 118,734 | #7 (2010) | #8 |
| 2020s | 37,379 | #12 (2020) | #26 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Abigail in 2006
Top girls' names in 2006
Top boys' names in 2006
More about 2006
girls
1,901,209 girls got a published name in 2006; 1 in 122 of them was named Abigail, which outranked 100.0% of the 20,064 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.7% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- ↑ 8,571Bethzy#9,452 → #881
- ↑ 1,747Rihanna#2,278 → #531
- ↑ 965Yaretzi#1,803 → #838
- ↑ 921Betsy#1,668 → #747
- ↑ 612Evangeline#1,210 → #598
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,055,273 boys got a published name in 2006; 1 in 128,455 of them was named Abigail, which outranked 62.2% of the 14,047 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #5,072Zedekiah17
- #5,072Zian17
- #5,072Zoey17
- #5,303Abigail16
- #5,303Aadyn16
- #5,303Aarron16
- #5,303Abid16
- #5,525Abu15
- #5,525Admir15
- #5,525Adonay15
Tied with 221 names at #5,303; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.