Abraham
- Last seen for girls in 2017 at #15,902
- #209 for boys in 2025, 1,664 births
- Given to boys 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1911 · 292 births
- Debut · boys
- 81 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 103,967since 1880
Abraham over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Abraham has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #209 | 1,664 | |
| 2024 | — | #204 | 1,737 | |
| 2023 | — | #218 | 1,695 | |
| 2022 | — | #203 | 1,843 | |
| 2021 | — | #202 | 1,916 | |
| 2020 | — | #201 | 1,900 | |
| 2019 | — | #191 | 2,065 | |
| 2018 | — | #163 | 2,373 | |
| 2017 | #15,902 | 5 | #169 | 2,328 |
| 2016 | — | #157 | 2,584 | |
| 2015 | #14,482 | 6 | #170 | 2,454 |
| 2014 | #10,129 | 10 | #181 | 2,382 |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #182 | 2,217 |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | #191 | 1,954 |
| 2011 | — | #192 | 1,938 | |
| 2010 | — | #194 | 1,925 | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #180 | 2,110 |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #186 | 2,149 |
| 2007 | — | #188 | 2,145 | |
| 2006 | — | #182 | 2,209 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #192 | 2,048 |
| 2004 | #12,761 | 7 | #193 | 1,988 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #195 | 1,897 |
| 2002 | — | #204 | 1,801 | |
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | #200 | 1,821 |
| 2000 | #10,745 | 8 | #213 | 1,686 |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 | #214 | 1,591 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #208 | 1,543 |
| 1997 | — | #216 | 1,428 | |
| 1996 | — | #227 | 1,336 | |
| 1995 | — | #232 | 1,288 | |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | #241 | 1,225 |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | #244 | 1,170 |
| 1992 | — | #254 | 1,143 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #243 | 1,162 |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #244 | 1,135 |
| 1989 | #9,681 | 7 | #254 | 999 |
| 1988 | — | #245 | 974 | |
| 1987 | #6,788 | 10 | #252 | 906 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #247 | 910 |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | #260 | 849 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #255 | 851 |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | #268 | 773 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #260 | 837 |
| 1981 | — | #269 | 813 | |
| 1980 | — | #273 | 779 | |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #277 | 736 |
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | #281 | 689 |
| 1977 | — | #289 | 677 | |
| 1976 | — | #307 | 571 | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | #340 | 501 |
| 1974 | #7,680 | 6 | #360 | 456 |
| 1973 | — | #384 | 403 | |
| 1972 | — | #397 | 388 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #423 | 364 |
| 1970 | — | #433 | 353 | |
| 1969 | — | #447 | 302 | |
| 1968 | — | #472 | 257 | |
| 1967 | — | #499 | 227 | |
| 1966 | — | #483 | 253 | |
| 1965 | — | #469 | 275 | |
| 1964 | — | #480 | 272 | |
| 1963 | — | #480 | 275 | |
| 1962 | — | #477 | 278 | |
| 1961 | — | #479 | 278 | |
| 1960 | — | #464 | 294 | |
| 1959 | — | #455 | 310 | |
| 1958 | — | #468 | 283 | |
| 1957 | — | #466 | 274 | |
| 1956 | — | #431 | 308 | |
| 1955 | — | #435 | 285 | |
| 1954 | — | #415 | 304 | |
| 1953 | — | #395 | 315 | |
| 1952 | — | #441 | 254 | |
| 1951 | — | #404 | 285 | |
| 1950 | — | #387 | 300 | |
| 1949 | — | #395 | 287 | |
| 1948 | — | #423 | 251 | |
| 1947 | — | #435 | 242 | |
| 1946 | — | #435 | 210 | |
| 1945 | — | #418 | 205 | |
| 1944 | — | #439 | 194 | |
| 1943 | — | #449 | 199 | |
| 1942 | — | #395 | 234 | |
| 1941 | — | #418 | 194 | |
| 1940 | — | #385 | 219 | |
| 1939 | — | #407 | 197 | |
| 1938 | — | #388 | 212 | |
| 1937 | — | #374 | 217 | |
| 1936 | — | #374 | 214 | |
| 1935 | — | #341 | 259 | |
| 1934 | — | #352 | 243 | |
| 1933 | — | #341 | 246 | |
| 1932 | — | #331 | 275 | |
| 1931 | — | #318 | 292 | |
| 1930 | — | #306 | 345 | |
| 1929 | — | #300 | 343 | |
| 1928 | — | #280 | 401 | |
| 1927 | — | #282 | 406 | |
| 1926 | — | #275 | 427 | |
| 1925 | — | #257 | 489 | |
| 1924 | — | #244 | 554 | |
| 1923 | — | #237 | 556 | |
| 1922 | — | #222 | 599 | |
| 1921 | — | #202 | 683 | |
| 1920 | — | #203 | 656 | |
| 1919 | — | #176 | 742 | |
| 1918 | — | #174 | 757 | |
| 1917 | — | #171 | 731 | |
| 1916 | — | #158 | 753 | |
| 1915 | — | #152 | 790 | |
| 1914 | — | #141 | 700 | |
| 1913 | — | #142 | 551 | |
| 1912 | — | #125 | 533 | |
| 1911 | — | #124 | 292 | |
| 1910 | — | #162 | 191 | |
| 1909 | — | #153 | 163 | |
| 1908 | — | #159 | 150 | |
| 1907 | — | #152 | 148 | |
| 1906 | — | #161 | 122 | |
| 1905 | — | #171 | 112 | |
| 1904 | — | #166 | 111 | |
| 1903 | — | #171 | 95 | |
| 1902 | — | #197 | 82 | |
| 1901 | — | #218 | 62 | |
| 1900 | — | #195 | 100 | |
| 1899 | — | #171 | 85 | |
| 1898 | — | #173 | 92 | |
| 1897 | — | #212 | 62 | |
| 1896 | — | #153 | 109 | |
| 1895 | — | #166 | 94 | |
| 1894 | — | #199 | 73 | |
| 1893 | — | #145 | 103 | |
| 1892 | — | #160 | 99 | |
| 1891 | — | #199 | 62 | |
| 1890 | — | #192 | 70 | |
| 1889 | — | #160 | 83 | |
| 1888 | — | #190 | 78 | |
| 1887 | — | #168 | 75 | |
| 1886 | — | #177 | 77 | |
| 1885 | — | #158 | 86 | |
| 1884 | — | #199 | 67 | |
| 1883 | — | #208 | 52 | |
| 1882 | — | #151 | 91 | |
| 1881 | — | #146 | 86 | |
| 1880 | — | #163 | 81 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Abraham was already there! It came in at #163, and was given to 81 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1884, when fewer than 68 boys a year got the name.
Where Abraham is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- New York#65 · 1 in 330
- Rhode Island#140 · 1 in 391
- Texas#143 · 1 in 656
- California#148 · 1 in 670
- New Jersey#150 · 1 in 612
Best ever in a state: #39 in New York, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #65 | 256 | 1 in 330 |
| Rhode Island | #140 | 8 | 1 in 391 |
| Texas | #143 | 267 | 1 in 656 |
| California | #148 | 262 | 1 in 670 |
| New Jersey | #150 | 65 | 1 in 612 |
| Nevada | #155 | 20 | 1 in 565 |
| Florida | #176 | 127 | 1 in 752 |
| Arizona | #183 | 47 | 1 in 696 |
| Nebraska | #196 | 13 | 1 in 678 |
| Colorado | #202 | 32 | 1 in 839 |
| Maryland | #208 | 28 | 1 in 818 |
| Tennessee | #244 | 36 | 1 in 1,021 |
| Virginia | #260 | 33 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Michigan | #270 | 37 | 1 in 1,086 |
| New Mexico | #270 | 7 | 1 in 929 |
| North Carolina | #270 | 45 | 1 in 1,144 |
| Illinois | #277 | 39 | 1 in 1,271 |
| Washington | #282 | 26 | 1 in 1,261 |
| Georgia | #286 | 43 | 1 in 1,168 |
| Utah | #302 | 16 | 1 in 1,229 |
| Massachusetts | #307 | 18 | 1 in 1,501 |
| Oregon | #326 | 12 | 1 in 1,255 |
| Oklahoma | #328 | 14 | 1 in 1,263 |
| South Carolina | #372 | 14 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Iowa | #379 | 9 | 1 in 1,537 |
| Missouri | #392 | 16 | 1 in 1,738 |
| Pennsylvania | #397 | 26 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Arkansas | #398 | 8 | 1 in 1,573 |
| Minnesota | #420 | 13 | 1 in 1,885 |
| Kentucky | #422 | 11 | 1 in 1,867 |
| Kansas | #428 | 8 | 1 in 1,756 |
| Indiana | #431 | 16 | 1 in 1,979 |
| Idaho | #435 | 5 | 1 in 1,726 |
| Wisconsin | #437 | 11 | 1 in 2,130 |
| Connecticut | #440 | 6 | 1 in 2,201 |
| Ohio | #513 | 20 | 1 in 2,627 |
| Alabama | #525 | 9 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Louisiana | #531 | 8 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Abraham
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 8 spots since 2020 (#201 → #209)
- Biggest jump: 46 spots in 1953
- Biggest drop: 59 spots in 1897
Rise & fade · boys
31 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1911 at #124 (292 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 734
- Highest: 1 in 734 boys born in 2016 were named Abraham (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,026 boys born in 2025 (0.10%)
- Its best rank, #124 in 1911, was only 1 in 774 (0.13%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 21.4% of all boys named Abraham (22,220) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 776 | #146 (1881) | #172 |
| 1890s | 849 | #145 (1893) | #177 |
| 1900s | 1,145 | #152 (1907) | #174 |
| 1910s | 6,040 | #124 (1911) | #153 |
| 1920s | 5,114 | #202 (1921) | #250 |
| 1930s | 2,500 | #306 (1930) | #353 |
| 1940s | 2,235 | #385 (1940) | #419 |
| 1950s | 2,918 | #387 (1950) | #430 |
| 1960s | 2,711 | #447 (1969) | #475 |
| 1970s | 5,138 | #277 (1979) | #349 |
| 1980s | 8,691 | #245 (1988) | #258 |
| 1990s | 13,021 | #208 (1998) | #232 |
| 2000s | 19,854 | #180 (2009) | #193 |
| 2010s | 22,220 | #157 (2016) | #179 |
| 2020s | 10,755 | #201 (2020) | #206 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Abraham ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: