Adam

#9,457 for girls in 2025, 10 births · #101 for boys in 2025, 3,501 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1984 · 23,939 births
Debut · boys
104 births
In top 100 · boys
53 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
580,378
since 1880

Adam over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201960peak #18, 1984boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#9,45710#1013,501
2024#11,1228#1003,507
2023—#1033,487
2022—#993,638
2021#15,2515#1043,657
2020#12,1427#973,781
2019#12,4487#914,188
2018#12,4647#784,711
2017#11,6158#774,933
2016#14,3316#755,224
2015#14,4826#735,404
2014#13,0697#795,344
2013#16,5475#825,251
2012—#825,323
2011#9,72311#815,215
2010#11,2469#805,111
2009#13,7047#745,676
2008#8,96513#726,098
2007#13,9247#656,790
2006#9,28612#646,806
2005#7,89114#646,846
2004#3,81937#587,474
2003#5,58621#587,690
2002#11,1088#557,754
2001#7,72413#517,758
2000#6,48716#458,136
1999#5,03921#448,223
1998#7,10413#458,356
1997#6,16315#398,805
1996#4,30624#399,557
1995#6,64113#3810,485
1994#3,09837#3811,023
1993#4,67121#3911,534
1992#3,09137#3611,905
1991#4,65021#3612,308
1990#3,15635#3214,713
1989#2,07260#2716,928
1988#1,56484#2616,467
1987#1,336102#2716,931
1986#1,42090#2418,157
1985#1,201117#2220,165
1984#1,007142#1823,939
1983#1,049132#1823,488
1982#1,178116#1920,099
1981#1,54977#2020,044
1980#1,31896#2218,868
1979#1,29497#2317,046
1978#1,58168#2913,918
1977#1,70161#3311,030
1976#1,96845#369,937
1975#1,98644#388,646
1974#1,77250#368,421
1973#2,06439#456,842
1972#2,74725#515,740
1971#2,73626#575,846
1970#3,11021#724,313
1969#3,31817#1142,860
1968#4,48910#1192,540
1967#5,4577#1182,524
1966#3,74012#1232,498
1965#4,8318#1252,561
1964#3,87912#1222,850
1963#5,2967#1452,346
1962—#1542,149
1961—#1931,579
1960—#2491,018
1959—#322582
1958—#353467
1957#5,3776#370432
1956—#380390
1955—#382354
1954—#428281
1953—#389324
1952—#404294
1951—#390300
1950—#382308
1949—#388300
1948—#430240
1947—#417269
1946—#406247
1945—#415210
1944—#404220
1943—#385253
1942—#391240
1941—#381230
1940—#379227
1939—#385216
1938—#385214
1937—#364222
1936—#371216
1935—#356237
1934—#355239
1933—#351234
1932—#344258
1931—#313300
1930—#337273
1929—#315306
1928—#297359
1927—#287389
1926—#277425
1925#4,4266#268452
1924—#263465
1923#3,9717#273428
1922—#260469
1921#5,0995#228583
1920—#223579
1919—#224542
1918—#197653
1917—#193614
1916—#189609
1915—#194574
1914—#182489
1913#3,1875#192349
1912—#188307
1911—#170189
1910—#182154
1909—#193113
1908—#192109
1907—#169127
1906—#173105
1905—#183101
1904—#175103
1903—#19382
1902—#17299
1901—#20171
1900—#187111
1899—#18574
1898—#17987
1897—#17588
1896—#16496
1895—#19078
1894—#17686
1893—#16687
1892—#151106
1891—#14987
1890—#18074
1889—#15393
1888—#130120
1887—#15084
1886—#134103
1885—#14196
1884—#16783
1883—#118107
1882—#123114
1881—#108116
1880—#123104
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Adam was already there! It came in at #123, and was given to 104 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1901–1906, when fewer than 110 boys a year got the name.

Where Adam is popular in 1960

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedAKMaine: #203 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 1,823 boysMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedNHWashington: #239 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 2,064 boysWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #342 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 7,077 boysMNIllinois: #234 for boys · 53 births · 1 in 2,185 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedWIMichigan: #266 for boys · 30 births · 1 in 3,147 boysMINew York: #127 for boys · 217 births · 1 in 827 boysNYMassachusetts: #131 for boys · 41 births · 1 in 1,395 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedRIOregon: #290 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,010 boysORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedIAIndiana: #342 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 4,933 boysINOhio: #214 for boys · 53 births · 1 in 2,117 boysOHPennsylvania: #214 for boys · 51 births · 1 in 2,350 boysPANew Jersey: #166 for boys · 45 births · 1 in 1,381 boysNJConnecticut: #156 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 1,408 boysCTCalifornia: #198 for boys · 145 births · 1 in 1,282 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedUTColorado: #215 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 1,422 boysCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedNEMissouri: #470 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 9,779 boysMOKentucky: #302 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 3,546 boysKYWest Virginia: #303 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 3,792 boysWVVirginia: #366 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 4,690 boysVAMaryland: #225 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 2,049 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedDEArizona: #340 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,830 boysAZNew Mexico: #291 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,960 boysNMKansas: #292 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,275 boysKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedARTennessee: #374 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,935 boysTNNorth Carolina: #396 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 5,217 boysNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: #195 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 1,354 boysDCOklahoma: #274 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,376 boysOKLouisiana: #269 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 1,918 boysLAMississippi: #265 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 2,067 boysMSAlabama: #408 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 5,402 boysALGeorgia: #393 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,823 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Adam, so not publishedHITexas: #216 for boys · 105 births · 1 in 1,168 boysTXFlorida: #357 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 3,916 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. New York#127 · 1 in 827
  2. Massachusetts#131 · 1 in 1,395
  3. Connecticut#156 · 1 in 1,408
  4. New Jersey#166 · 1 in 1,381
  5. District of Columbia#195 · 1 in 1,354

Best ever in a state: #4 in Wisconsin, 1984.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New York#1272171 in 827
Massachusetts#131411 in 1,395
Connecticut#156191 in 1,408
New Jersey#166451 in 1,381
District of Columbia#195111 in 1,354
California#1981451 in 1,282
Maine#20361 in 1,823
Ohio#214531 in 2,117
Pennsylvania#214511 in 2,350
Colorado#215151 in 1,422
Texas#2161051 in 1,168
Maryland#225161 in 2,049
Illinois#234531 in 2,185
Washington#239151 in 2,064
Mississippi#265131 in 2,067
Michigan#266301 in 3,147
Louisiana#269221 in 1,918
Oklahoma#274101 in 2,376
Oregon#29061 in 3,010
New Mexico#29171 in 1,960
Kansas#29271 in 3,275
Kentucky#302101 in 3,546
West Virginia#30351 in 3,792
Arizona#34061 in 2,830
Indiana#342111 in 4,933
Minnesota#34261 in 7,077
Florida#357141 in 3,916
Virginia#36691 in 4,690
Tennessee#37481 in 4,935
Georgia#393101 in 4,823
North Carolina#396101 in 5,217
Alabama#40871 in 5,402
Missouri#47051 in 9,779
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Delaware———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Adam
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#100 → #101)
  • 4 spots since 2020 (#97 → #101)
  • 28 spots since 2015 (#73 → #101)
  • Biggest jump: 73 spots in 1960 (#322 → #249)
  • Biggest drop: 49 spots in 1884 (#118 → #167)
Rise & fade · boys
104 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1984 at #18 (23,939 births)
  • Births halved by 1992, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 53 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 53 yrs · run 1970–2020
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 75
  • Highest: 1 in 75 boys born in 1984 were named Adam (1.3%)
  • Latest: 1 in 488 boys born in 2025 (0.20%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
  • 33.6% of all boys named Adam (195,086) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,020#108 (1881)#135
1890s863#149 (1891)#172
1900s1,021#169 (1907)#184
1910s4,480#170 (1911)#191
1920s4,455#223 (1920)#269
1930s2,409#313 (1931)#356
1940s2,436#379 (1940)#400
1950s3,732#322 (1959)#380
1960s22,925#114 (1969)#146
1970s91,739#23 (1979)#42
1980s195,086#18 (1984)#22
1990s106,909#32 (1990)#39
2000s71,028#45 (2000)#61
2010s50,704#73 (2015)#80
2020s21,571#97 (2020)#101

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Adam in 1960

boys
#249
1,018 births · 1 in 2,095 boys

Top boys' names in 1960

  1. #1David85,929
  2. #2Michael84,153
  3. #3James76,815
  4. #4John76,096
  5. #5Robert72,357
  6. #6Mark58,727
  7. #7William49,361
  8. #8Richard43,553
  9. #9Thomas39,278
  10. #10Steven33,878
  11. #249Adam1,018
More about 1960

boys

2,132,320 boys got a published name in 1960; 1 in 2,095 of them was named Adam, which outranked 94.6% of the 4,598 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Adam
  1. #246Herman1,050
  2. #247Derek1,047
  3. #248Ross1,044
  4. #249Adam1,018
  5. #250Nelson1,016
  6. #251Terrence1,014
  7. #252Harvey1,003
Biggest movers since 1959
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,061Stephon#3,988 → #927
  2. ↑ 1,039Kennedy#1,759 → #720
  3. ↑ 489Darryle#1,416 → #927
  4. ↑ 379Garret#1,360 → #981
  5. ↑ 373Darryll#1,324 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 333Grayling#987 → #1,320
  2. ↓ 327Lucious#946 → #1,273
  3. ↓ 274Brion#919 → #1,193
  4. ↓ 261Gail#747 → #1,008
  5. ↓ 254Delton#939 → #1,193

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1960 →