Ahmad
Last seen for girls in 1979 at #9,010 · #669 for boys in 2025, 407 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2001 · 662 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 20,348since 1950
Ahmad over time
Rank among boys' names. Ahmad has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #669 | 407 | |
| 2024 | — | #668 | 411 | |
| 2023 | — | #685 | 393 | |
| 2022 | — | #634 | 437 | |
| 2021 | — | #689 | 385 | |
| 2020 | — | #625 | 429 | |
| 2019 | — | #602 | 454 | |
| 2018 | — | #552 | 502 | |
| 2017 | — | #564 | 481 | |
| 2016 | — | #588 | 466 | |
| 2015 | — | #565 | 498 | |
| 2014 | — | #567 | 490 | |
| 2013 | — | #569 | 458 | |
| 2012 | — | #579 | 444 | |
| 2011 | — | #588 | 426 | |
| 2010 | — | #523 | 494 | |
| 2009 | — | #482 | 567 | |
| 2008 | — | #560 | 465 | |
| 2007 | — | #558 | 462 | |
| 2006 | — | #524 | 487 | |
| 2005 | — | #467 | 542 | |
| 2004 | — | #487 | 508 | |
| 2003 | — | #465 | 542 | |
| 2002 | — | #404 | 626 | |
| 2001 | — | #386 | 662 | |
| 2000 | — | #454 | 526 | |
| 1999 | — | #419 | 562 | |
| 1998 | — | #402 | 608 | |
| 1997 | — | #529 | 378 | |
| 1996 | — | #519 | 390 | |
| 1995 | — | #546 | 347 | |
| 1994 | — | #535 | 367 | |
| 1993 | — | #548 | 342 | |
| 1992 | — | #580 | 309 | |
| 1991 | — | #594 | 293 | |
| 1990 | — | #560 | 327 | |
| 1989 | — | #545 | 315 | |
| 1988 | — | #605 | 241 | |
| 1987 | — | #540 | 284 | |
| 1986 | — | #564 | 248 | |
| 1985 | — | #638 | 190 | |
| 1984 | — | #673 | 166 | |
| 1983 | — | #641 | 179 | |
| 1982 | — | #596 | 208 | |
| 1981 | — | #535 | 245 | |
| 1980 | — | #556 | 238 | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #491 | 286 |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | #590 | 204 |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | #584 | 207 |
| 1976 | — | #755 | 121 | |
| 1975 | — | #712 | 135 | |
| 1974 | — | #767 | 111 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,123 | 53 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,060 | 58 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,014 | 64 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,192 | 48 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,605 | 26 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,455 | 29 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,652 | 22 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,963 | 16 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,720 | 21 | |
| 1964 | — | #2,114 | 15 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,300 | 13 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,757 | 21 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,778 | 21 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,772 | 21 | |
| 1959 | — | #2,033 | 16 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,506 | 11 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,201 | 7 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #3,681 | 5 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Ahmad! It came in at #3,681, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1950–1952, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Ahmad is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New York#832 · 1 in 29,134
- California#853 · 1 in 26,718
Best ever in a state: #122 in District of Columbia, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | #832 | 6 | 1 in 29,134 |
| California | #853 | 7 | 1 in 26,718 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ahmad
- 1 spot since 2024 (#668 → #669)
- 44 spots since 2020 (#625 → #669)
- 104 spots since 2015 (#565 → #669)
- Biggest jump: 356 spots in 1974 (#1,123 → #767)
- Biggest drop: 65 spots in 1980 (#491 → #556)
- Debuted 1950
- Peaked 2001 at #386 (662 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 52 yrs · run 1974–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,935 boys born in 2001 were named Ahmad (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 4,197 boys born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 26.5% of all boys named Ahmad (5,387) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 57 | #2,033 (1959) | #3,151 |
| 1960s | 205 | #1,455 (1968) | #1,812 |
| 1970s | 1,287 | #491 (1979) | #829 |
| 1980s | 2,314 | #535 (1981) | #589 |
| 1990s | 3,923 | #402 (1998) | #523 |
| 2000s | 5,387 | #386 (2001) | #479 |
| 2010s | 4,713 | #523 (2010) | #570 |
| 2020s | 2,462 | #625 (2020) | #662 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ahmad in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 98,513 of them was named Ahmad, which outranked 62.1% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,713Willaim22
- #1,713Yale22
- #1,713Yves22
- #1,757Ahmad21
- #1,757Alaric21
- #1,757Albin21
- #1,757Anson21
- #1,805Allie20
- #1,805Ann20
- #1,805Anselmo20
Tied with 47 names at #1,757; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.