Aiko
- #2,719 for girls in 2025, 63 births
- #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
- Given to girls 94.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1919 · 41 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,785since 1912
Aiko over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,719 | 63 | #6,446 | 13 |
| 2024 | #2,389 | 76 | #8,312 | 9 |
| 2023 | #2,352 | 77 | #4,742 | 21 |
| 2022 | #2,856 | 59 | #4,570 | 22 |
| 2021 | #3,069 | 53 | #5,338 | 17 |
| 2020 | #2,890 | 56 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2019 | #3,337 | 47 | #8,215 | 9 |
| 2018 | #4,458 | 31 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,517 | 23 | — | |
| 2016 | #5,284 | 25 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,458 | 24 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,269 | 34 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,486 | 24 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,957 | 28 | — | |
| 2011 | #4,915 | 28 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,023 | 37 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,298 | 50 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,006 | 39 | — | |
| 2007 | #5,097 | 28 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,992 | 37 | — | |
| 2005 | #4,195 | 33 | — | |
| 2004 | #4,816 | 27 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,109 | 32 | — | |
| 2002 | #3,730 | 35 | — | |
| 2001 | #7,724 | 13 | — | |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | — | |
| 1998 | #5,583 | 18 | — | |
| 1997 | #6,163 | 15 | — | |
| 1996 | #7,130 | 12 | — | |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | — | |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | — | |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | — | |
| 1992 | #8,734 | 9 | — | |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,867 | 12 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,761 | 8 | — | |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 | — | |
| 1987 | #7,987 | 8 | — | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | — | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | — | |
| 1984 | #9,144 | 6 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | — | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | — | |
| 1981 | #8,128 | 7 | — | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 | — | |
| 1978 | #8,562 | 6 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | — | |
| 1972 | #6,558 | 7 | — | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | — | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | — | |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,731 | 10 | — | |
| 1934 | #2,741 | 10 | — | |
| 1933 | #2,404 | 12 | — | |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,750 | 20 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,110 | 16 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,704 | 22 | — | |
| 1928 | #1,680 | 24 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,669 | 25 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,262 | 38 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,252 | 39 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,244 | 41 | — | |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,366 | 34 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,195 | 17 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,349 | 34 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,155 | 41 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,566 | 26 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,773 | 20 | — | |
| 1916 | #2,133 | 15 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,540 | 7 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,144 | 8 | — | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1912
The first year at least five girls were named Aiko! It came in at #2,144, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1940–1942, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Aiko is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#1,651 · 1 in 12,440
- Florida#2,151 · 1 in 17,352
Best ever in a state: #35 in Hawaii, 1919.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,651 | 13 | 1 in 12,440 |
| Florida | #2,151 | 5 | 1 in 17,352 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Aiko
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 330 spots since 2024 (#2,389 → #2,719)
- 171 spots since 2020 (#2,890 → #2,719)
Rise & fade · girls
7 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1919 at #1,155 (41 births)
- Births halved by 1921, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 20,839
- Highest: 1 in 20,839 girls born in 2023 were named Aiko (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 25,512 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,155 in 1919, was only 1 in 27,564 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 21.5% of all girls named Aiko (384) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 134 | #1,155 (1919) | #2,109 |
| 1920s | 306 | #1,244 (1924) | #1,515 |
| 1930s | 108 | #1,750 (1931) | #2,834 |
| 1940s | 7 | #3,801 (1943) | #3,801 |
| 1950s | 5 | #6,103 (1958) | #6,103 |
| 1960s | 0 | — | — |
| 1970s | 45 | #6,558 (1972) | #8,414 |
| 1980s | 60 | #6,705 (1983) | #9,109 |
| 1990s | 124 | #5,583 (1998) | #7,211 |
| 2000s | 311 | #3,298 (2009) | #4,718 |
| 2010s | 301 | #3,337 (2019) | #4,770 |
| 2020s | 384 | #2,352 (2023) | #2,713 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Aiko ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: