Aime
#7,133 for girls in 2025, 15 births · Last seen for boys in 2009 at #12,491
Given to girls 79.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1994 · 123 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,850since 1961
Aime over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #7,133 | 15 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,799 | 21 | — | |
| 2023 | #6,409 | 18 | — | |
| 2022 | #6,707 | 17 | — | |
| 2021 | #6,414 | 18 | — | |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,612 | 22 | — | |
| 2018 | #7,100 | 16 | — | |
| 2017 | #5,191 | 25 | — | |
| 2016 | #6,663 | 18 | — | |
| 2015 | #5,833 | 22 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,544 | 31 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,645 | 30 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,782 | 41 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,659 | 42 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,751 | 118 | — | |
| 2009 | #6,544 | 20 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #5,279 | 27 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #5,097 | 28 | — | |
| 2006 | #4,811 | 29 | — | |
| 2005 | #6,245 | 19 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,490 | 42 | — | |
| 2003 | #4,668 | 27 | — | |
| 2002 | #4,381 | 28 | — | |
| 2001 | #3,549 | 37 | — | |
| 2000 | #4,185 | 29 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,970 | 29 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,573 | 33 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,556 | 50 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,177 | 62 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,819 | 78 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,357 | 123 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,158 | 36 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | — | |
| 1991 | #4,808 | 20 | — | |
| 1990 | #5,286 | 17 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,670 | 19 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,321 | 15 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,524 | 25 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,845 | 33 | — | |
| 1985 | #4,455 | 17 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,069 | 28 | — | |
| 1983 | #3,065 | 27 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,581 | 36 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,529 | 37 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,002 | 29 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,343 | 40 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,781 | 57 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,063 | 46 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,255 | 37 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,456 | 32 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,313 | 20 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,914 | 23 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | — | |
| 1971 | #4,123 | 14 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,311 | 19 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 | — | |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,257 | 7 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | #3,143 | 7 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #2,802 | 8 | |
| 1948 | — | #3,010 | 7 | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | #2,690 | 8 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | #2,964 | 7 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,560 | 5 | |
| 1941 | — | #2,207 | 11 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #2,609 | 8 | |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #2,184 | 11 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,529 | 9 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,266 | 11 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,542 | 9 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,328 | 11 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,178 | 13 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,672 | 20 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,843 | 9 | |
| 1927 | — | #1,796 | 19 | |
| 1926 | — | #2,074 | 15 | |
| 1925 | — | #1,870 | 18 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,132 | 15 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,123 | 15 | |
| 1922 | — | #1,644 | 22 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,980 | 17 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,131 | 15 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,576 | 22 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,073 | 15 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,528 | 22 | |
| 1916 | — | #1,949 | 15 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,660 | 18 | |
| 1914 | — | #1,492 | 17 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,945 | 9 | |
| 1912 | — | #1,417 | 12 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | #1,589 | 5 | |
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | #999 | 8 | |
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Aime! It came in at #5,309, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1962–1964, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Aime is popular in 1936
No state had 5 or more girls named Aime in 1936, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Aime
- 1,334 spots since 2024 (#5,799 → #7,133)
- 79 spots since 2020 (#7,212 → #7,133)
- 1,300 spots since 2015 (#5,833 → #7,133)
- Debuted 1961
- Peaked 1994 at #1,357 (123 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 14,518 girls born in 1994 were named Aime (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 107,151 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 25.2% of all girls named Aime (466) were born in this decade
- Mostly boys until 1960, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 54 | #3,845 (1967) | #4,866 |
| 1970s | 309 | #1,781 (1978) | #2,762 |
| 1980s | 266 | #2,529 (1981) | #3,506 |
| 1990s | 466 | #1,357 (1994) | #3,397 |
| 2000s | 286 | #3,490 (2004) | #4,825 |
| 2010s | 365 | #1,751 (2010) | #4,878 |
| 2020s | 104 | #5,799 (2024) | #6,612 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Aime in 1936
Top boys' names in 1936
More about 1936
boys
1,037,205 boys got a published name in 1936; 1 in 94,291 of them was named Aime, which outranked 45.9% of the 4,037 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,062Winthrop12
- #2,062Ysidro12
- #2,062Zeb12
- #2,184Aime11
- #2,184Acy11
- #2,184Adrien11
- #2,184Adron11
- #2,301Abran10
- #2,301Alcide10
- #2,301Alson10
Tied with 116 names at #2,184; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.