Alba

#1,261 for girls in 2025, 177 births · Last seen for boys in 1981 at #6,262
Given to girls 98.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1880 · 6 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
7,471
since 1880

Alba over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Alba has never cracked the top 700 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202008peak #738, 1880girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,261177—
2024#1,169205—
2023#1,238188—
2022#1,220198—
2021#1,221193—
2020#1,214188—
2019#1,392161—
2018#1,616132—
2017#1,495148—
2016#1,712124—
2015#1,454158—
2014#1,493149—
2013#1,509146—
2012#1,624133—
2011#1,690124—
2010#1,783115—
2009#2,61470—
2008#2,31884—
2007#2,43377—
2006#2,24885—
2005#2,67063—
2004#2,62063—
2003#2,84054—
2002#2,37967—
2001#2,17175—
2000#2,05580—
1999#2,61054—
1998#2,37059—
1997#1,89977—
1996#1,86478—
1995#1,86375—
1994#1,81079—
1993#1,57797—
1992#1,63093—
1991#1,70286—
1990#1,397113—
1989#1,187137—
1988#1,255117—
1987#1,64774—
1986#1,77065—
1985#1,78463—
1984#1,43281—
1983#1,75161—
1982#1,48980—
1981#1,271101#6,2625
1980#1,83359—
1979#2,52536—
1978#2,47435—
1977#1,92251—
1976#2,29236—
1975#2,13640—
1974#2,06640—
1973#2,56528—
1972#2,22234—
1971#2,42731—
1970#2,77925—
1969#2,20833—
1968#1,88740—
1967#2,21229—
1966#2,51923—
1965#2,46424—
1964#1,86740—
1963#1,86739—
1962#2,46324—
1961#2,54323—
1960#2,09730—
1959#1,98532—
1958#1,87234—
1957#2,16826—
1956#2,00529—
1955#1,80334—
1954#1,62339—
1953#1,78331—
1952#1,78131#3,7345
1951#1,63734—
1950#1,72030—
1949#2,51416—
1948#2,07022—
1947#2,35418—
1946#3,4309—
1945#2,74211—
1944#2,40114—
1943#2,86111#3,5385
1942#2,04618—
1941#2,27214—
1940#1,54925—
1939#1,58523—
1938#1,54724—
1937#1,45126—
1936#1,95016—
1935#1,55023—
1934#1,40927#3,2776
1933#1,26232—
1932#1,23734—
1931#1,07443—
1930#1,01453#3,5926
1929#1,30633—
1928#1,09747—
1927#1,09748—
1926#1,07948#3,7086
1925#1,06451#2,9369
1924#1,10750—
1923#92862#2,9509
1922#98957#4,3075
1921#1,05751—
1920#1,13244#3,2088
1919#95455#4,1685
1918#98953#3,3687
1917#90458#2,7329
1916#95951—
1915#74779#3,0827
1914#81751—
1913#85238#1,9459
1912#82037—
1911#1,07117—
1910#91422—
1909#1,29011—
1908#1,08414—
1907#1,20611—
1906#89517—
1905#1,23810—
1904#1,00113—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900#1,4318—
1899——
1898#1,5026—
1897#1,3856—
1896#1,04710—
1895#98611—
1894#99810—
1893#1,4375—
1892—#8617
1891#1,2136—
1890——
1889#83910—
1888#1,0367—
1887#9377—
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881#8305—
1880#7386—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Alba was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1881–1886, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Alba is popular in 2008

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMINew York: #1,380 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 9,553 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,174 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 20,849 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,425 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,616 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Alba, so not publishedHITexas: #1,456 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 10,482 girlsTXFlorida: #1,499 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 10,760 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New York#1,380 · 1 in 9,553
  2. North Carolina#1,425 · 1 in 9,616
  3. Texas#1,456 · 1 in 10,482
  4. Florida#1,499 · 1 in 10,760
  5. California#2,174 · 1 in 20,849

Best ever in a state: #246 in Massachusetts, 1923.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New York#1,380101 in 9,553
North Carolina#1,42551 in 9,616
Texas#1,456161 in 10,482
Florida#1,49981 in 10,760
California#2,174111 in 20,849
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Alba
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 92 spots since 2024 (#1,169 → #1,261)
  • 47 spots since 2020 (#1,214 → #1,261)
  • 193 spots since 2015 (#1,454 → #1,261)
  • Biggest jump: 439 spots in 1894 (#1,437 → #998)
  • Biggest drop: 311 spots in 1907 (#895 → #1,206)
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1880 at #738 (6 births)
  • Births halved by 1882, 2 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 18 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 18 yrs · run 1912–1919
Share of babies · girls
1 in 7,903
  • Highest: 1 in 7,903 girls born in 2024 were named Alba (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 9,081 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #738 in 1880, was only 1 in 15,166 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 18.6% of all girls named Alba (1,390) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s35#738 (1880)#876
1890s54#986 (1895)#1,224
1900s84#895 (1906)#1,164
1910s461#747 (1915)#903
1920s491#928 (1923)#1,086
1930s301#1,014 (1930)#1,408
1940s158#1,549 (1940)#2,424
1950s320#1,623 (1954)#1,838
1960s305#1,867 (1964)#2,213
1970s356#1,922 (1977)#2,341
1980s838#1,187 (1989)#1,542
1990s811#1,397 (1990)#1,872
2000s718#2,055 (2000)#2,435
2010s1,390#1,392 (2019)#1,577
2020s1,149#1,169 (2024)#1,221

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Alba in 2008

girls
#2,318
84 births · 1 in 22,511 girls

Top girls' names in 2008

  1. #1Emma18,830
  2. #2Isabella18,629
  3. #3Emily17,448
  4. #4Olivia17,088
  5. #5Ava17,051
  6. #6Madison17,047
  7. #7Sophia16,091
  8. #8Abigail15,088
  9. #9Elizabeth12,027
  10. #10Chloe11,836
  11. #2,318Alba84
More about 2008

girls

1,890,938 girls got a published name in 2008; 1 in 22,511 of them was named Alba, which outranked 88.7% of the 20,482 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Alba
  1. #2,295Violette85
  2. #2,295Yanely85
  3. #2,295Yuri85
  4. #2,318Alba84
  5. #2,318Adelle84
  6. #2,318Anamaria84
  7. #2,318Breann84
  8. #2,334Adilyn83
  9. #2,334Amaia83
  10. #2,334Anushka83

Tied with 15 names at #2,318; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2007
Risers
  1. ↑ 9,375Dayami#10,129 → #754
  2. ↑ 4,524Allisson#4,944 → #420
  3. ↑ 1,019Alisson#1,804 → #785
  4. ↑ 851Milagros#1,579 → #728
  5. ↑ 807Mareli#1,530 → #723
Fallers
  1. ↓ 391Kelis#968 → #1,359
  2. ↓ 390Joselin#755 → #1,145
  3. ↓ 378Tyra#947 → #1,325
  4. ↓ 363Montana#932 → #1,295
  5. ↓ 337Allyssa#988 → #1,325

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2008 →