Alicia
- #460 for girls in 2025, 672 births
- Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
- Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1984 · 7,820 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 27 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 230,790since 1881
Alicia over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #460 | 672 | — | |
| 2024 | #438 | 708 | — | |
| 2023 | #440 | 703 | — | |
| 2022 | #414 | 760 | — | |
| 2021 | #417 | 754 | — | |
| 2020 | #414 | 753 | — | |
| 2019 | #414 | 756 | — | |
| 2018 | #391 | 794 | — | |
| 2017 | #359 | 873 | — | |
| 2016 | #380 | 866 | — | |
| 2015 | #359 | 915 | — | |
| 2014 | #341 | 978 | — | |
| 2013 | #318 | 1,024 | — | |
| 2012 | #270 | 1,205 | — | |
| 2011 | #260 | 1,231 | — | |
| 2010 | #219 | 1,433 | — | |
| 2009 | #208 | 1,562 | — | |
| 2008 | #177 | 1,866 | — | |
| 2007 | #178 | 1,950 | — | |
| 2006 | #164 | 2,133 | — | |
| 2005 | #148 | 2,345 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #130 | 2,517 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #131 | 2,542 | — | |
| 2002 | #121 | 2,820 | — | |
| 2001 | #130 | 2,658 | — | |
| 2000 | #121 | 2,762 | — | |
| 1999 | #108 | 3,014 | — | |
| 1998 | #98 | 3,408 | — | |
| 1997 | #89 | 3,782 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #91 | 3,861 | #5,982 | 9 |
| 1995 | #89 | 3,908 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #83 | 4,105 | #5,452 | 10 |
| 1993 | #76 | 4,431 | #4,447 | 13 |
| 1992 | #71 | 4,910 | #4,327 | 13 |
| 1991 | #63 | 5,558 | #3,636 | 16 |
| 1990 | #54 | 6,511 | #2,780 | 23 |
| 1989 | #53 | 6,817 | #1,891 | 39 |
| 1988 | #50 | 6,700 | #2,146 | 29 |
| 1987 | #46 | 6,776 | #1,829 | 35 |
| 1986 | #45 | 7,017 | #1,837 | 33 |
| 1985 | #45 | 7,122 | #2,427 | 21 |
| 1984 | #40 | 7,820 | #1,723 | 33 |
| 1983 | #41 | 7,492 | #1,864 | 29 |
| 1982 | #53 | 5,614 | #2,269 | 22 |
| 1981 | #46 | 5,855 | #2,338 | 21 |
| 1980 | #47 | 5,753 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #47 | 5,547 | #2,048 | 25 |
| 1978 | #58 | 4,752 | #2,279 | 20 |
| 1977 | #60 | 4,400 | #3,037 | 13 |
| 1976 | #71 | 3,791 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #76 | 3,718 | #2,540 | 16 |
| 1974 | #90 | 3,434 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #91 | 3,433 | #2,606 | 14 |
| 1972 | #96 | 3,268 | #1,928 | 22 |
| 1971 | #105 | 3,590 | #1,987 | 21 |
| 1970 | #118 | 3,320 | #2,739 | 12 |
| 1969 | #117 | 3,046 | #3,935 | 6 |
| 1968 | #126 | 2,569 | #2,907 | 9 |
| 1967 | #150 | 2,304 | #2,985 | 8 |
| 1966 | #156 | 2,227 | — | |
| 1965 | #159 | 2,354 | #2,617 | 10 |
| 1964 | #159 | 2,417 | #3,282 | 7 |
| 1963 | #173 | 2,215 | #3,044 | 8 |
| 1962 | #187 | 1,976 | #3,041 | 8 |
| 1961 | #206 | 1,674 | #3,097 | 8 |
| 1960 | #210 | 1,640 | — | |
| 1959 | #231 | 1,366 | #3,988 | 5 |
| 1958 | #273 | 1,049 | — | |
| 1957 | #260 | 1,101 | #3,257 | 7 |
| 1956 | #265 | 1,037 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #262 | 1,029 | #2,964 | 8 |
| 1954 | #279 | 923 | — | |
| 1953 | #272 | 914 | — | |
| 1952 | #273 | 875 | — | |
| 1951 | #272 | 826 | — | |
| 1950 | #276 | 768 | — | |
| 1949 | #291 | 707 | — | |
| 1948 | #291 | 687 | — | |
| 1947 | #282 | 747 | — | |
| 1946 | #312 | 562 | — | |
| 1945 | #314 | 460 | — | |
| 1944 | #333 | 424 | — | |
| 1943 | #363 | 394 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #373 | 360 | #3,560 | 5 |
| 1941 | #346 | 358 | #2,656 | 8 |
| 1940 | #373 | 309 | #3,130 | 6 |
| 1939 | #337 | 354 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | #370 | 313 | — | |
| 1937 | #391 | 274 | — | |
| 1936 | #384 | 274 | — | |
| 1935 | #431 | 223 | — | |
| 1934 | #426 | 237 | — | |
| 1933 | #420 | 232 | — | |
| 1932 | #410 | 251 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #380 | 289 | — | |
| 1930 | #370 | 334 | — | |
| 1929 | #388 | 301 | — | |
| 1928 | #389 | 293 | — | |
| 1927 | #389 | 308 | — | |
| 1926 | #415 | 270 | #4,201 | 5 |
| 1925 | #457 | 228 | — | |
| 1924 | #469 | 219 | — | |
| 1923 | #514 | 185 | — | |
| 1922 | #556 | 164 | — | |
| 1921 | #615 | 141 | — | |
| 1920 | #587 | 149 | — | |
| 1919 | #626 | 125 | — | |
| 1918 | #647 | 118 | — | |
| 1917 | #649 | 110 | — | |
| 1916 | #706 | 95 | — | |
| 1915 | #761 | 75 | — | |
| 1914 | #788 | 54 | — | |
| 1913 | #689 | 57 | — | |
| 1912 | #735 | 46 | — | |
| 1911 | #650 | 44 | — | |
| 1910 | #768 | 31 | — | |
| 1909 | #706 | 32 | — | |
| 1908 | #639 | 36 | — | |
| 1907 | #819 | 21 | — | |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 | — | |
| 1905 | #926 | 16 | — | |
| 1904 | #805 | 20 | — | |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,438 | 7 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,007 | 11 | — | |
| 1900 | #885 | 18 | — | |
| 1899 | #835 | 15 | — | |
| 1898 | #821 | 17 | — | |
| 1897 | #867 | 14 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 | — | |
| 1894 | #812 | 14 | — | |
| 1893 | #826 | 13 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,093 | 7 | — | |
| 1890 | #791 | 12 | — | |
| 1889 | #839 | 10 | — | |
| 1888 | #837 | 10 | — | |
| 1887 | #860 | 8 | — | |
| 1886 | #693 | 11 | — | |
| 1885 | #793 | 8 | — | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #692 | 8 | — | |
| 1882 | #740 | 7 | — | |
| 1881 | #679 | 7 | — | |
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1881
The first year at least five girls were named Alicia! It came in at #679, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Alicia is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Arizona#233 · 1 in 973
- California#269 · 1 in 1,326
- Texas#278 · 1 in 1,305
- New Mexico#296 · 1 in 935
- Massachusetts#302 · 1 in 1,265
Best ever in a state: #22 in Mississippi, 1983.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #233 | 29 | 1 in 973 |
| California | #269 | 122 | 1 in 1,326 |
| Texas | #278 | 123 | 1 in 1,305 |
| New Mexico | #296 | 5 | 1 in 935 |
| Massachusetts | #302 | 19 | 1 in 1,265 |
| Maryland | #304 | 17 | 1 in 1,176 |
| Florida | #329 | 54 | 1 in 1,607 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Iowa | #390 | 8 | 1 in 1,472 |
| New Jersey | #390 | 20 | 1 in 1,775 |
| Idaho | #402 | 5 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Washington | #414 | 17 | 1 in 1,698 |
| Illinois | #455 | 23 | 1 in 1,927 |
| Georgia | #487 | 23 | 1 in 1,966 |
| Arkansas | #489 | 6 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Colorado | #497 | 11 | 1 in 2,121 |
| Virginia | #520 | 15 | 1 in 2,249 |
| Minnesota | #540 | 9 | 1 in 2,387 |
| Indiana | #577 | 11 | 1 in 2,537 |
| Oregon | #619 | 5 | 1 in 2,610 |
| New York | #628 | 26 | 1 in 3,013 |
| Pennsylvania | #647 | 15 | 1 in 3,113 |
| Kentucky | #653 | 6 | 1 in 2,875 |
| North Carolina | #659 | 15 | 1 in 3,099 |
| Tennessee | #707 | 10 | 1 in 3,207 |
| Ohio | #711 | 13 | 1 in 3,636 |
| Alabama | #716 | 6 | 1 in 3,053 |
| Missouri | #728 | 7 | 1 in 3,471 |
| Wisconsin | #791 | 5 | 1 in 4,052 |
| Michigan | #1,210 | 5 | 1 in 7,146 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alicia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 46 spots since 2020 (#414 → #460)
- Biggest jump: 542 spots in 1903
- Biggest drop: 302 spots in 1891
Rise & fade · girls
103 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1881
- Peaked 1984 at #40 (7,820 births)
- Births halved by 1995, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 27 yrs · run 1972–1998
- Top 1,000: 141 yrs · run 1903–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 215
- Highest: 1 in 215 girls born in 1984 were named Alicia (0.46%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,392 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 29.0% of all girls named Alicia (66,966) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 69 | #679 (1881) | #767 |
| 1890s | 130 | #791 (1890) | #872 |
| 1900s | 192 | #639 (1908) | #904 |
| 1910s | 755 | #626 (1919) | #702 |
| 1920s | 2,258 | #388 (1929) | #478 |
| 1930s | 2,781 | #337 (1939) | #392 |
| 1940s | 5,008 | #282 (1947) | #328 |
| 1950s | 9,888 | #231 (1959) | #266 |
| 1960s | 22,422 | #117 (1969) | #164 |
| 1970s | 39,253 | #47 (1979) | #81 |
| 1980s | 66,966 | #40 (1984) | #47 |
| 1990s | 43,488 | #54 (1990) | #82 |
| 2000s | 23,155 | #121 (2002) | #151 |
| 2010s | 10,075 | #219 (2010) | #331 |
| 2020s | 4,350 | #414 (2022) | #431 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Alicia ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: