Aliza
- #675 for girls in 2025, 420 births
- Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
- Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 445 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,970since 1952
Aliza over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Aliza has never cracked the top 600 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #675 | 420 | — | |
| 2024 | #659 | 445 | — | |
| 2023 | #661 | 445 | — | |
| 2022 | #751 | 385 | — | |
| 2021 | #678 | 429 | — | |
| 2020 | #669 | 427 | — | |
| 2019 | #680 | 427 | — | |
| 2018 | #709 | 410 | — | |
| 2017 | #684 | 427 | — | |
| 2016 | #689 | 424 | — | |
| 2015 | #674 | 423 | — | |
| 2014 | #818 | 339 | — | |
| 2013 | #922 | 276 | — | |
| 2012 | #872 | 305 | — | |
| 2011 | #926 | 280 | — | |
| 2010 | #825 | 325 | — | |
| 2009 | #784 | 360 | — | |
| 2008 | #858 | 324 | — | |
| 2007 | #834 | 343 | — | |
| 2006 | #854 | 314 | — | |
| 2005 | #767 | 346 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #776 | 332 | — | |
| 2003 | #839 | 291 | — | |
| 2002 | #818 | 284 | — | |
| 2001 | #855 | 266 | — | |
| 2000 | #946 | 225 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,006 | 204 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,242 | 146 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,218 | 147 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,186 | 152 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,318 | 126 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,521 | 102 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,741 | 85 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,434 | 112 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,689 | 87 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,456 | 107 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,686 | 81 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,671 | 77 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,570 | 80 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,770 | 65 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,666 | 70 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,703 | 64 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,447 | 80 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,489 | 80 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,912 | 56 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,154 | 47 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,897 | 55 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,191 | 42 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,091 | 45 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,210 | 38 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,881 | 25 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,100 | 39 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,939 | 42 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,724 | 51 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,640 | 56 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,474 | 68 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,561 | 58 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,887 | 40 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,167 | 30 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,959 | 11 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,475 | 25 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | #3,592 | 13 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,957 | 18 | — | |
| 1960 | #3,512 | 13 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | — | |
| 1958 | #4,193 | 9 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1952
The first year at least five girls were named Aliza! It came in at #4,908, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1953, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Aliza is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Jersey#239 · 1 in 1,044
- Connecticut#393 · 1 in 1,643
- New York#421 · 1 in 1,910
- Minnesota#422 · 1 in 1,790
- Maryland#427 · 1 in 1,665
Best ever in a state: #88 in Vermont, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | #239 | 34 | 1 in 1,044 |
| Connecticut | #393 | 7 | 1 in 1,643 |
| New York | #421 | 41 | 1 in 1,910 |
| Minnesota | #422 | 12 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Maryland | #427 | 12 | 1 in 1,665 |
| Pennsylvania | #452 | 23 | 1 in 2,030 |
| Kansas | #497 | 6 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Michigan | #589 | 13 | 1 in 2,749 |
| Louisiana | #597 | 7 | 1 in 2,339 |
| Indiana | #611 | 10 | 1 in 2,791 |
| Texas | #633 | 49 | 1 in 3,276 |
| Ohio | #668 | 14 | 1 in 3,377 |
| Massachusetts | #682 | 7 | 1 in 3,433 |
| Colorado | #703 | 7 | 1 in 3,332 |
| Illinois | #748 | 12 | 1 in 3,694 |
| Tennessee | #748 | 9 | 1 in 3,564 |
| Virginia | #758 | 9 | 1 in 3,749 |
| South Carolina | #773 | 5 | 1 in 3,658 |
| Missouri | #811 | 6 | 1 in 4,050 |
| Arizona | #818 | 7 | 1 in 4,031 |
| Florida | #825 | 19 | 1 in 4,566 |
| California | #830 | 35 | 1 in 4,621 |
| Georgia | #854 | 11 | 1 in 4,110 |
| North Carolina | #1,057 | 8 | 1 in 5,810 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Aliza
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 6 spots since 2020 (#669 → #675)
- Biggest jump: 144 spots in 2015
- Biggest drop: 101 spots in 2011
Rise & fade · girls
72 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1952
- Peaked 2024 at #659 (445 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 26 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 2000–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,606
- Highest: 1 in 3,606 girls born in 2023 were named Aliza (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,827 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #659 in 2024, was only 1 in 3,641 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 30.4% of all girls named Aliza (3,636) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 35 | #4,193 (1958) | #4,867 |
| 1960s | 234 | #1,561 (1969) | #2,970 |
| 1970s | 461 | #1,474 (1970) | #2,015 |
| 1980s | 700 | #1,447 (1983) | #1,707 |
| 1990s | 1,268 | #1,006 (1999) | #1,381 |
| 2000s | 3,085 | #767 (2005) | #833 |
| 2010s | 3,636 | #674 (2015) | #780 |
| 2020s | 2,551 | #659 (2024) | #682 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Aliza ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: