Alize
- #2,998 for girls in 2025, 55 births
- #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
- Given to girls 93.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1998 · 311 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 5,334since 1987
Alize over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,998 | 55 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #2,889 | 57 | #8,987 | 8 |
| 2023 | #2,730 | 63 | #8,255 | 9 |
| 2022 | #2,821 | 60 | — | |
| 2021 | #2,929 | 57 | — | |
| 2020 | #2,966 | 54 | — | |
| 2019 | #2,856 | 58 | — | |
| 2018 | #3,107 | 52 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #2,713 | 63 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,010 | 55 | — | |
| 2015 | #2,773 | 63 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,351 | 78 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,939 | 102 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #2,016 | 96 | #8,864 | 8 |
| 2011 | #1,480 | 151 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,402 | 163 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #1,284 | 189 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,145 | 224 | #9,871 | 7 |
| 2007 | #1,069 | 245 | #6,262 | 13 |
| 2006 | #952 | 274 | #5,525 | 15 |
| 2005 | #824 | 311 | #7,640 | 9 |
| 2004 | #918 | 264 | #5,246 | 15 |
| 2003 | #764 | 324 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #744 | 326 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #800 | 294 | #5,142 | 14 |
| 2000 | #796 | 287 | #4,204 | 18 |
| 1999 | #732 | 307 | #3,986 | 18 |
| 1998 | #711 | 311 | #2,094 | 44 |
| 1997 | #767 | 274 | #1,790 | 53 |
| 1996 | #749 | 282 | #1,986 | 44 |
| 1995 | #1,197 | 143 | #2,500 | 30 |
| 1994 | #4,238 | 24 | — | |
| 1993 | #7,038 | 12 | — | |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | — | |
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1987
The first year at least five girls were named Alize! It came in at #11,325, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1987–1988, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Alize is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#1,323 · 1 in 8,985
- Texas#1,790 · 1 in 13,379
Best ever in a state: #132 in New Mexico, 2003.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,323 | 18 | 1 in 8,985 |
| Texas | #1,790 | 12 | 1 in 13,379 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alize
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 32 spots since 2020 (#2,966 → #2,998)
- Biggest jump: 448 spots in 1996
- Biggest drop: 154 spots in 2004
Rise & fade · girls
11 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1987
- Peaked 1998 at #711 (311 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 11 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 11 yrs · run 1996–2006
Share of babies · girls
1 in 5,512
- Highest: 1 in 5,512 girls born in 2002 were named Alize (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 29,223 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #711 in 1998, was only 1 in 5,682 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 51.3% of all girls named Alize (2,738) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 11 | #10,847 (1989) | #11,086 |
| 1990s | 1,358 | #711 (1998) | #3,594 |
| 2000s | 2,738 | #744 (2002) | #930 |
| 2010s | 881 | #1,402 (2010) | #2,365 |
| 2020s | 346 | #2,730 (2023) | #2,889 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Alize ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: