Alma
- #449 for girls in 2025, 689 births
- #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
- Given to girls 98.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1896 · 1,243 births
- Debut · girls
- 277 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 48 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 163,723since 1880
Alma over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #449 | 689 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2024 | #471 | 659 | #7,765 | 10 |
| 2023 | #461 | 666 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #483 | 658 | — | |
| 2021 | #507 | 613 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #560 | 524 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #615 | 491 | — | |
| 2018 | #648 | 458 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #651 | 455 | #7,095 | 11 |
| 2016 | #724 | 392 | #8,816 | 8 |
| 2015 | #684 | 417 | #8,040 | 9 |
| 2014 | #675 | 421 | — | |
| 2013 | #701 | 402 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #852 | 313 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #875 | 298 | #10,808 | 6 |
| 2010 | #844 | 318 | — | |
| 2009 | #810 | 349 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #789 | 369 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #701 | 415 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #614 | 475 | #7,427 | 10 |
| 2005 | #591 | 481 | — | |
| 2004 | #608 | 453 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #635 | 421 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #532 | 515 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #512 | 527 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #491 | 548 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #487 | 532 | #5,656 | 11 |
| 1998 | #484 | 527 | #4,413 | 15 |
| 1997 | #466 | 536 | #7,281 | 7 |
| 1996 | #447 | 566 | #5,187 | 11 |
| 1995 | #440 | 583 | #5,501 | 10 |
| 1994 | #429 | 586 | #3,469 | 19 |
| 1993 | #393 | 645 | #5,002 | 11 |
| 1992 | #365 | 702 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | #386 | 668 | #3,325 | 18 |
| 1990 | #386 | 685 | #3,779 | 15 |
| 1989 | #400 | 615 | #2,615 | 24 |
| 1988 | #444 | 511 | #3,203 | 16 |
| 1987 | #447 | 492 | #3,521 | 13 |
| 1986 | #420 | 521 | #4,457 | 9 |
| 1985 | #409 | 549 | #3,216 | 14 |
| 1984 | #399 | 530 | #2,824 | 16 |
| 1983 | #412 | 522 | #2,676 | 17 |
| 1982 | #381 | 603 | #2,596 | 18 |
| 1981 | #340 | 687 | #2,898 | 15 |
| 1980 | #358 | 658 | #2,444 | 20 |
| 1979 | #383 | 579 | #2,236 | 22 |
| 1978 | #402 | 513 | #3,400 | 11 |
| 1977 | #375 | 564 | #2,270 | 20 |
| 1976 | #362 | 580 | #2,946 | 13 |
| 1975 | #391 | 520 | #2,134 | 21 |
| 1974 | #362 | 595 | #2,199 | 19 |
| 1973 | #378 | 555 | #3,223 | 10 |
| 1972 | #379 | 568 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #387 | 584 | — | |
| 1970 | #420 | 534 | #2,739 | 12 |
| 1969 | #427 | 510 | #3,595 | 7 |
| 1968 | #397 | 543 | #3,673 | 6 |
| 1967 | #365 | 604 | #2,470 | 11 |
| 1966 | #370 | 599 | #2,986 | 8 |
| 1965 | #397 | 551 | #2,084 | 15 |
| 1964 | #388 | 616 | #2,665 | 10 |
| 1963 | #374 | 670 | #2,858 | 9 |
| 1962 | #357 | 713 | #2,279 | 13 |
| 1961 | #334 | 788 | #2,409 | 12 |
| 1960 | #334 | 788 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #332 | 814 | #2,111 | 15 |
| 1958 | #339 | 766 | #3,944 | 5 |
| 1957 | #285 | 983 | #2,375 | 12 |
| 1956 | #284 | 948 | #3,216 | 7 |
| 1955 | #277 | 963 | #2,139 | 14 |
| 1954 | #260 | 1,013 | #2,114 | 14 |
| 1953 | #245 | 1,088 | #2,038 | 15 |
| 1952 | #246 | 1,029 | #2,153 | 13 |
| 1951 | #246 | 981 | #1,774 | 18 |
| 1950 | #232 | 1,052 | #3,021 | 7 |
| 1949 | #229 | 1,054 | #2,606 | 9 |
| 1948 | #214 | 1,160 | #1,817 | 17 |
| 1947 | #215 | 1,184 | #2,169 | 13 |
| 1946 | #208 | 1,170 | #1,759 | 17 |
| 1945 | #188 | 1,081 | #2,393 | 9 |
| 1944 | #176 | 1,217 | #1,525 | 20 |
| 1943 | #174 | 1,336 | #2,277 | 11 |
| 1942 | #165 | 1,407 | #1,585 | 20 |
| 1941 | #163 | 1,364 | #1,333 | 25 |
| 1940 | #152 | 1,428 | #2,478 | 9 |
| 1939 | #150 | 1,496 | #1,390 | 23 |
| 1938 | #147 | 1,558 | #1,109 | 34 |
| 1937 | #138 | 1,626 | #1,528 | 20 |
| 1936 | #137 | 1,610 | #1,384 | 23 |
| 1935 | #132 | 1,679 | #1,226 | 30 |
| 1934 | #123 | 1,903 | #1,461 | 22 |
| 1933 | #124 | 1,839 | #1,330 | 25 |
| 1932 | #119 | 2,045 | #1,110 | 37 |
| 1931 | #114 | 2,115 | #1,111 | 37 |
| 1930 | #109 | 2,380 | #1,330 | 29 |
| 1929 | #106 | 2,389 | #1,214 | 33 |
| 1928 | #107 | 2,496 | #1,413 | 27 |
| 1927 | #97 | 2,847 | #1,198 | 36 |
| 1926 | #91 | 2,990 | #1,296 | 31 |
| 1925 | #94 | 2,996 | #1,279 | 32 |
| 1924 | #87 | 3,240 | #1,355 | 30 |
| 1923 | #89 | 3,070 | #1,589 | 23 |
| 1922 | #84 | 3,233 | #1,259 | 33 |
| 1921 | #78 | 3,589 | #1,101 | 41 |
| 1920 | #80 | 3,584 | #1,139 | 39 |
| 1919 | #76 | 3,438 | #989 | 47 |
| 1918 | #73 | 3,650 | #918 | 52 |
| 1917 | #71 | 3,407 | #1,033 | 40 |
| 1916 | #70 | 3,403 | #922 | 47 |
| 1915 | #70 | 3,248 | #996 | 40 |
| 1914 | #69 | 2,648 | #949 | 34 |
| 1913 | #64 | 2,297 | #777 | 37 |
| 1912 | #62 | 2,183 | #918 | 24 |
| 1911 | #62 | 1,611 | #896 | 14 |
| 1910 | #61 | 1,630 | #1,118 | 9 |
| 1909 | #61 | 1,375 | #653 | 17 |
| 1908 | #53 | 1,474 | #712 | 14 |
| 1907 | #58 | 1,347 | #866 | 10 |
| 1906 | #57 | 1,266 | #709 | 12 |
| 1905 | #56 | 1,333 | #786 | 10 |
| 1904 | #55 | 1,257 | #966 | 7 |
| 1903 | #53 | 1,244 | #846 | 8 |
| 1902 | #55 | 1,229 | #862 | 8 |
| 1901 | #52 | 1,195 | #559 | 13 |
| 1900 | #57 | 1,372 | #699 | 13 |
| 1899 | #51 | 1,146 | #714 | 9 |
| 1898 | #52 | 1,299 | #701 | 10 |
| 1897 | #51 | 1,213 | #852 | 7 |
| 1896 | #51 | 1,243 | #481 | 18 |
| 1895 | #55 | 1,144 | #501 | 16 |
| 1894 | #52 | 1,177 | #1,074 | 5 |
| 1893 | #54 | 1,055 | #650 | 10 |
| 1892 | #56 | 1,056 | #597 | 12 |
| 1891 | #55 | 929 | #497 | 13 |
| 1890 | #57 | 922 | #603 | 11 |
| 1889 | #62 | 819 | #525 | 13 |
| 1888 | #58 | 853 | #609 | 11 |
| 1887 | #63 | 623 | #583 | 10 |
| 1886 | #62 | 603 | #959 | 5 |
| 1885 | #68 | 515 | #604 | 10 |
| 1884 | #70 | 480 | — | |
| 1883 | #79 | 359 | #597 | 10 |
| 1882 | #74 | 368 | #611 | 10 |
| 1881 | #78 | 293 | #460 | 14 |
| 1880 | #82 | 277 | #482 | 14 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Alma was already there! It came in at #82, and was given to 277 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 370 girls a year got the name.
Where Alma is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Florida#209 · 1 in 964
- Minnesota#221 · 1 in 859
- Oregon#273 · 1 in 1,004
- Connecticut#322 · 1 in 1,278
- California#327 · 1 in 1,634
Best ever in a state: #22 in Florida, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #209 | 90 | 1 in 964 |
| Minnesota | #221 | 25 | 1 in 859 |
| Oregon | #273 | 13 | 1 in 1,004 |
| Connecticut | #322 | 9 | 1 in 1,278 |
| California | #327 | 99 | 1 in 1,634 |
| New York | #328 | 51 | 1 in 1,536 |
| Washington | #343 | 21 | 1 in 1,374 |
| Massachusetts | #353 | 16 | 1 in 1,502 |
| Nebraska | #396 | 5 | 1 in 1,419 |
| South Carolina | #403 | 12 | 1 in 1,524 |
| New Jersey | #404 | 19 | 1 in 1,868 |
| Illinois | #417 | 25 | 1 in 1,773 |
| Indiana | #418 | 16 | 1 in 1,744 |
| Texas | #422 | 80 | 1 in 2,007 |
| Nevada | #433 | 6 | 1 in 1,534 |
| Maryland | #459 | 11 | 1 in 1,817 |
| Ohio | #483 | 22 | 1 in 2,149 |
| Utah | #490 | 8 | 1 in 2,135 |
| Iowa | #492 | 6 | 1 in 1,962 |
| Arizona | #546 | 12 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Michigan | #553 | 14 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Missouri | #589 | 9 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Pennsylvania | #595 | 17 | 1 in 2,746 |
| Tennessee | #603 | 12 | 1 in 2,673 |
| Virginia | #606 | 12 | 1 in 2,812 |
| Colorado | #634 | 8 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Georgia | #676 | 15 | 1 in 3,014 |
| North Carolina | #684 | 14 | 1 in 3,320 |
| Wisconsin | #791 | 5 | 1 in 4,052 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 111 spots since 2020 (#560 → #449)
- Biggest jump: 151 spots in 2013
- Biggest drop: 103 spots in 2003
Rise & fade · girls
16 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1896 at #51 (1,243 births)
- Births halved by 1964, 68 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 48 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 48 yrs · run 1880–1927
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 189
- Highest: 1 in 189 girls born in 1894 were named Alma (0.53%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,333 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #51 in 1896, was only 1 in 191 (0.52%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 18.6% of all girls named Alma (30,434) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5,190 | #58 (1888) | #70 |
| 1890s | 11,184 | #51 (1896) | #53 |
| 1900s | 13,092 | #52 (1901) | #56 |
| 1910s | 27,515 | #61 (1910) | #68 |
| 1920s | 30,434 | #78 (1921) | #91 |
| 1930s | 18,251 | #109 (1930) | #129 |
| 1940s | 12,401 | #152 (1940) | #188 |
| 1950s | 9,637 | #232 (1950) | #275 |
| 1960s | 6,382 | #334 (1960) | #374 |
| 1970s | 5,592 | #362 (1974) | #384 |
| 1980s | 5,688 | #340 (1981) | #401 |
| 1990s | 6,030 | #365 (1992) | #428 |
| 2000s | 4,553 | #491 (2000) | #628 |
| 2010s | 3,965 | #615 (2019) | #727 |
| 2020s | 3,809 | #449 (2025) | #489 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Alma ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: