Almer
Last seen for girls in 1956 at #5,952 · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #7,270
Given to boys 63.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1887 · 8 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 559since 1880
Almer over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #7,270 | 5 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #4,724 | 5 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | #2,592 | 10 | |
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #2,844 | 8 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,021 | 7 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,820 | 17 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | #2,271 | 11 | |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | — | #3,109 | 6 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,732 | 8 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,940 | 7 | |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #2,081 | 12 |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,579 | 11 | #2,646 | 8 |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | #2,332 | 10 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | #1,693 | 18 |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #2,921 | 10 | #2,199 | 13 |
| 1928 | #2,497 | 13 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 | #1,806 | 19 |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 | #1,628 | 23 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #2,614 | 11 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #2,633 | 13 | #2,152 | 15 |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | #1,694 | 21 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #1,973 | 16 |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 | #1,437 | 24 |
| 1916 | #2,246 | 14 | #1,771 | 17 |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | #1,968 | 14 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #1,772 | 13 |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | #1,580 | 12 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #1,353 | 13 |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,357 | 10 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #752 | 11 | |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | #874 | 8 |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | #1,137 | 5 | |
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #679 | 8 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #909 | 5 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Almer was already there! It came in at #909, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Almer is popular in 1896
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Almer
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1988
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1887 at #679 (8 births)
- Births halved by 1888, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · 1880–1908
- Highest: 1 in 12,105 boys born in 1906 were named Almer (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 382,857 boys born in 1988 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #679 in 1887, was only 1 in 12,676 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.2% of all boys named Almer (141) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1959, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24 | #679 (1887) | #845 |
| 1890s | 12 | #928 (1899) | #955 |
| 1900s | 38 | #752 (1906) | #953 |
| 1910s | 141 | #1,353 (1912) | #1,632 |
| 1920s | 140 | #1,628 (1924) | #2,138 |
| 1930s | 86 | #1,693 (1931) | #2,645 |
| 1940s | 72 | #1,820 (1949) | #2,678 |
| 1950s | 31 | #2,592 (1954) | #2,971 |
| 1960s | 5 | #4,038 (1960) | #4,038 |
| 1970s | 5 | #4,724 (1970) | #4,724 |
| 1980s | 5 | #7,270 (1988) | #7,270 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Almer in 1896
Top boys' names in 1896
More about 1896
boys
119,565 boys got a published name in 1896; 1 in 19,928 of them was named Almer, which outranked 22.4% of the 1,266 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 35.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).