Almer
Last seen for girls in 1956 at #5,952 · Last seen for boys in 1988 at #7,270
Given to boys 63.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1887 · 8 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 559since 1880
Almer over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #7,270 | 5 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | #4,724 | 5 | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | — | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | #2,592 | 10 | |
| 1953 | — | #3,425 | 6 | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | #2,844 | 8 | |
| 1950 | — | #3,021 | 7 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,820 | 17 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | #2,271 | 11 | |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #3,338 | 5 |
| 1944 | — | #3,109 | 6 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,732 | 8 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,940 | 7 | |
| 1941 | #3,252 | 8 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #4,349 | 5 | #2,081 | 12 |
| 1939 | #3,429 | 7 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,579 | 11 | #2,646 | 8 |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | #2,332 | 10 |
| 1936 | #3,701 | 6 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | — | #2,951 | 7 | |
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | #2,266 | 11 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | #3,568 | 7 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | #1,693 | 18 |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #2,921 | 10 | #2,199 | 13 |
| 1928 | #2,497 | 13 | #2,270 | 13 |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,873 | 7 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #3,664 | 8 | #1,806 | 19 |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 | #1,628 | 23 |
| 1923 | #2,917 | 11 | #2,614 | 11 |
| 1922 | #3,379 | 9 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #2,633 | 13 | #2,152 | 15 |
| 1920 | #2,463 | 14 | #1,694 | 21 |
| 1919 | #2,264 | 15 | #1,973 | 16 |
| 1918 | #3,244 | 9 | #1,446 | 25 |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 | #1,437 | 24 |
| 1916 | #2,246 | 14 | #1,771 | 17 |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | #1,968 | 14 |
| 1914 | #3,188 | 6 | #1,772 | 13 |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | #1,580 | 12 |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 | #1,353 | 13 |
| 1911 | #2,191 | 6 | #1,387 | 7 |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | #1,957 | 6 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,357 | 10 | #946 | 9 |
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #752 | 11 | |
| 1905 | #1,696 | 6 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,877 | 5 | #874 | 8 |
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | #1,137 | 5 | |
| 1901 | — | #1,058 | 5 | |
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | #928 | 6 | |
| 1898 | #1,700 | 5 | — | |
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | #982 | 6 | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | #1,332 | 5 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | #679 | 8 | |
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #848 | 6 | |
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #909 | 5 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Almer was already there! It came in at #909, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Almer is popular in 1932
No state had 5 or more boys named Almer in 1932, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Almer
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1988
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1887 at #679 (8 births)
- Births halved by 1888, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · 1880–1908
- Highest: 1 in 12,105 boys born in 1906 were named Almer (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 382,857 boys born in 1988 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #679 in 1887, was only 1 in 12,676 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.2% of all boys named Almer (141) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 1959, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 24 | #679 (1887) | #845 |
| 1890s | 12 | #928 (1899) | #955 |
| 1900s | 38 | #752 (1906) | #953 |
| 1910s | 141 | #1,353 (1912) | #1,632 |
| 1920s | 140 | #1,628 (1924) | #2,138 |
| 1930s | 86 | #1,693 (1931) | #2,645 |
| 1940s | 72 | #1,820 (1949) | #2,678 |
| 1950s | 31 | #2,592 (1954) | #2,971 |
| 1960s | 5 | #4,038 (1960) | #4,038 |
| 1970s | 5 | #4,724 (1970) | #4,724 |
| 1980s | 5 | #7,270 (1988) | #7,270 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Almer in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
Top boys' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 152,450 of them was named Almer, which outranked 30.0% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #3,274Yoko8
- #3,274Yoshie8
- #3,274Zara8
- #3,568Almer7
- #3,568Adel7
- #3,568Adelfa7
- #3,568Adlean7
- #3,901Adalene6
- #3,901Adamae6
- #3,901Addis6
Tied with 332 names at #3,568; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,044,157 boys got a published name in 1932; 1 in 104,416 of them was named Almer, which outranked 42.5% of the 4,284 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,313Wilmon11
- #2,313Winfrey11
- #2,313Zygmunt11
- #2,465Almer10
- #2,465Abbott10
- #2,465Adelard10
- #2,465Alroy10
- #2,638Abran9
- #2,638Acy9
- #2,638Admiral9
Tied with 172 names at #2,465; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.