Alondra
- #680 for girls in 2025, 417 births
- Last seen for boys in 2014 at #10,717
- Given to girls 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 2,721 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 42,299since 1959
Alondra over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Alondra has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #680 | 417 | — | |
| 2024 | #583 | 517 | — | |
| 2023 | #524 | 579 | — | |
| 2022 | #510 | 618 | — | |
| 2021 | #524 | 589 | — | |
| 2020 | #520 | 582 | — | |
| 2019 | #508 | 620 | — | |
| 2018 | #457 | 690 | — | |
| 2017 | #368 | 847 | — | |
| 2016 | #392 | 846 | — | |
| 2015 | #350 | 947 | — | |
| 2014 | #358 | 915 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #321 | 1,019 | — | |
| 2012 | #282 | 1,128 | — | |
| 2011 | #251 | 1,274 | — | |
| 2010 | #254 | 1,279 | #12,231 | 5 |
| 2009 | #229 | 1,447 | — | |
| 2008 | #202 | 1,661 | — | |
| 2007 | #184 | 1,836 | #6,262 | 13 |
| 2006 | #171 | 2,068 | #9,585 | 7 |
| 2005 | #120 | 2,721 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | #153 | 2,178 | #8,143 | 8 |
| 2003 | #168 | 1,999 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #162 | 1,995 | — | |
| 2001 | #177 | 1,830 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #182 | 1,762 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #181 | 1,725 | #6,530 | 9 |
| 1998 | #203 | 1,536 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #167 | 1,837 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #157 | 2,021 | #4,185 | 15 |
| 1995 | #238 | 1,205 | #4,280 | 14 |
| 1994 | #1,184 | 149 | — | |
| 1993 | #972 | 193 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,174 | 149 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,277 | 131 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,410 | 112 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,651 | 83 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,506 | 90 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,838 | 63 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,802 | 63 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,523 | 80 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,633 | 67 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,522 | 74 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,566 | 75 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,147 | 27 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,609 | 22 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,242 | 16 | — | |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,407 | 20 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | — | |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,362 | 13 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,959 | 8 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,266 | 20 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,712 | 16 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,489 | 10 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,982 | 8 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,266 | 15 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #4,019 | 11 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | — | |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | — | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1959
The first year at least five girls were named Alondra! It came in at #4,625, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1965, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Alondra is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Oregon#320 · 1 in 1,187
- Texas#372 · 1 in 1,745
- Nevada#374 · 1 in 1,314
- California#388 · 1 in 1,903
- Arizona#416 · 1 in 1,764
Best ever in a state: #29 in Nevada, 2005.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon | #320 | 11 | 1 in 1,187 |
| Texas | #372 | 92 | 1 in 1,745 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| California | #388 | 85 | 1 in 1,903 |
| Arizona | #416 | 16 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Illinois | #484 | 21 | 1 in 2,111 |
| Colorado | #536 | 10 | 1 in 2,333 |
| South Carolina | #560 | 8 | 1 in 2,286 |
| Florida | #674 | 25 | 1 in 3,470 |
| Georgia | #676 | 15 | 1 in 3,014 |
| Wisconsin | #700 | 6 | 1 in 3,376 |
| Utah | #704 | 5 | 1 in 3,415 |
| Alabama | #716 | 6 | 1 in 3,053 |
| North Carolina | #729 | 13 | 1 in 3,576 |
| Minnesota | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,580 |
| Washington | #732 | 8 | 1 in 3,608 |
| New Jersey | #774 | 9 | 1 in 3,944 |
| Tennessee | #813 | 8 | 1 in 4,009 |
| Virginia | #936 | 7 | 1 in 4,820 |
| New York | #1,165 | 12 | 1 in 6,527 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alondra
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 160 spots since 2020 (#520 → #680)
- Biggest jump: 946 spots in 1995
- Biggest drop: 212 spots in 1994
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1959
- Peaked 2005 at #120 (2,721 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 32 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 32 yrs · run 1995–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 679
- Highest: 1 in 679 girls born in 2005 were named Alondra (0.15%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,854 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 46.1% of all girls named Alondra (19,497) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 8 | #4,625 (1959) | #4,625 |
| 1960s | 75 | #3,266 (1966) | #4,729 |
| 1970s | 150 | #3,266 (1971) | #4,385 |
| 1980s | 644 | #1,506 (1988) | #1,980 |
| 1990s | 9,058 | #157 (1996) | #696 |
| 2000s | 19,497 | #120 (2005) | #175 |
| 2010s | 9,565 | #251 (2011) | #354 |
| 2020s | 3,302 | #510 (2022) | #557 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Alondra ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: