Alonzo
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #9,244 · #511 for boys in 2025, 590 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 122 births
- Debut · boys
- 122 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 45,955since 1880
Alonzo over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Alonzo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #511 | 590 | |
| 2024 | — | #512 | 595 | |
| 2023 | — | #535 | 552 | |
| 2022 | — | #471 | 651 | |
| 2021 | — | #515 | 569 | |
| 2020 | — | #477 | 626 | |
| 2019 | — | #469 | 634 | |
| 2018 | — | #476 | 612 | |
| 2017 | — | #522 | 549 | |
| 2016 | — | #565 | 499 | |
| 2015 | — | #527 | 542 | |
| 2014 | — | #528 | 527 | |
| 2013 | — | #500 | 545 | |
| 2012 | — | #568 | 454 | |
| 2011 | — | #558 | 455 | |
| 2010 | — | #581 | 434 | |
| 2009 | — | #612 | 412 | |
| 2008 | — | #543 | 483 | |
| 2007 | — | #588 | 432 | |
| 2006 | — | #559 | 450 | |
| 2005 | — | #537 | 452 | |
| 2004 | — | #547 | 421 | |
| 2003 | — | #533 | 436 | |
| 2002 | — | #523 | 433 | |
| 2001 | — | #559 | 375 | |
| 2000 | — | #516 | 435 | |
| 1999 | — | #519 | 410 | |
| 1998 | — | #526 | 394 | |
| 1997 | — | #479 | 450 | |
| 1996 | — | #507 | 407 | |
| 1995 | — | #477 | 453 | |
| 1994 | — | #465 | 469 | |
| 1993 | — | #494 | 421 | |
| 1992 | — | #506 | 398 | |
| 1991 | — | #476 | 428 | |
| 1990 | — | #476 | 432 | |
| 1989 | — | #455 | 426 | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #421 | 460 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #441 | 406 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #452 | 371 |
| 1985 | — | #488 | 315 | |
| 1984 | — | #470 | 321 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #466 | 322 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #469 | 325 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #473 | 310 |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #431 | 363 |
| 1979 | — | #444 | 334 | |
| 1978 | — | #483 | 282 | |
| 1977 | — | #416 | 360 | |
| 1976 | — | #450 | 301 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #432 | 331 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #430 | 336 |
| 1973 | — | #413 | 357 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #411 | 368 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #394 | 418 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #402 | 403 |
| 1969 | — | #385 | 414 | |
| 1968 | — | #397 | 385 | |
| 1967 | — | #371 | 405 | |
| 1966 | — | #389 | 384 | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #376 | 422 |
| 1964 | — | #369 | 449 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #370 | 458 |
| 1962 | — | #336 | 538 | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | #366 | 476 |
| 1960 | #6,390 | 5 | #367 | 464 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #375 | 443 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #362 | 454 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #400 | 377 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #360 | 418 |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | #354 | 415 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #366 | 375 |
| 1953 | — | #348 | 396 | |
| 1952 | — | #364 | 341 | |
| 1951 | — | #348 | 383 | |
| 1950 | — | #353 | 364 | |
| 1949 | — | #390 | 297 | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #360 | 350 |
| 1947 | — | #396 | 300 | |
| 1946 | — | #400 | 259 | |
| 1945 | — | #408 | 219 | |
| 1944 | — | #396 | 235 | |
| 1943 | — | #378 | 263 | |
| 1942 | — | #387 | 245 | |
| 1941 | — | #384 | 223 | |
| 1940 | — | #357 | 256 | |
| 1939 | — | #352 | 249 | |
| 1938 | — | #368 | 233 | |
| 1937 | — | #358 | 226 | |
| 1936 | — | #380 | 207 | |
| 1935 | — | #354 | 240 | |
| 1934 | — | #345 | 253 | |
| 1933 | — | #335 | 252 | |
| 1932 | — | #333 | 271 | |
| 1931 | — | #368 | 235 | |
| 1930 | — | #340 | 268 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #372 | 239 |
| 1928 | — | #350 | 265 | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #338 | 287 |
| 1926 | — | #335 | 298 | |
| 1925 | — | #336 | 295 | |
| 1924 | — | #310 | 340 | |
| 1923 | — | #327 | 319 | |
| 1922 | — | #321 | 320 | |
| 1921 | — | #335 | 315 | |
| 1920 | — | #332 | 308 | |
| 1919 | — | #309 | 321 | |
| 1918 | — | #336 | 287 | |
| 1917 | — | #319 | 286 | |
| 1916 | — | #315 | 274 | |
| 1915 | — | #318 | 267 | |
| 1914 | — | #318 | 204 | |
| 1913 | — | #293 | 184 | |
| 1912 | — | #263 | 177 | |
| 1911 | — | #223 | 128 | |
| 1910 | — | #254 | 90 | |
| 1909 | — | #223 | 95 | |
| 1908 | — | #287 | 57 | |
| 1907 | — | #224 | 82 | |
| 1906 | — | #205 | 85 | |
| 1905 | — | #190 | 93 | |
| 1904 | — | #211 | 76 | |
| 1903 | — | #248 | 56 | |
| 1902 | — | #199 | 81 | |
| 1901 | — | #208 | 67 | |
| 1900 | — | #182 | 116 | |
| 1899 | — | #180 | 78 | |
| 1898 | — | #161 | 104 | |
| 1897 | — | #181 | 84 | |
| 1896 | — | #182 | 89 | |
| 1895 | — | #185 | 85 | |
| 1894 | — | #150 | 102 | |
| 1893 | — | #201 | 71 | |
| 1892 | — | #154 | 104 | |
| 1891 | — | #175 | 74 | |
| 1890 | — | #161 | 88 | |
| 1889 | — | #141 | 102 | |
| 1888 | — | #139 | 110 | |
| 1887 | — | #144 | 88 | |
| 1886 | — | #128 | 106 | |
| 1885 | — | #130 | 104 | |
| 1884 | — | #128 | 112 | |
| 1883 | — | #123 | 100 | |
| 1882 | — | #111 | 133 | |
| 1881 | — | #110 | 111 | |
| 1880 | — | #110 | 122 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Alonzo was already there! It came in at #110, and was given to 122 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1904, when fewer than 82 boys a year got the name.
Where Alonzo is popular in 1952
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- South Carolina#201 · 1 in 1,307
- Mississippi#205 · 1 in 1,441
- Tennessee#207 · 1 in 1,969
- Georgia#233 · 1 in 1,946
- District of Columbia#239 · 1 in 2,403
Best ever in a state: #72 in West Virginia, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #201 | 23 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Mississippi | #205 | 20 | 1 in 1,441 |
| Tennessee | #207 | 20 | 1 in 1,969 |
| Georgia | #233 | 24 | 1 in 1,946 |
| District of Columbia | #239 | 6 | 1 in 2,403 |
| Alabama | #248 | 19 | 1 in 2,045 |
| Arkansas | #250 | 10 | 1 in 2,145 |
| Florida | #254 | 16 | 1 in 2,219 |
| Illinois | #268 | 27 | 1 in 3,726 |
| Louisiana | #284 | 16 | 1 in 2,349 |
| Virginia | #322 | 10 | 1 in 4,108 |
| Maryland | #325 | 5 | 1 in 5,527 |
| North Carolina | #346 | 13 | 1 in 4,095 |
| Missouri | #362 | 7 | 1 in 6,343 |
| Pennsylvania | #372 | 12 | 1 in 9,818 |
| New York | #386 | 20 | 1 in 8,239 |
| Kentucky | #410 | 5 | 1 in 7,134 |
| Texas | #416 | 27 | 1 in 4,262 |
| Ohio | #428 | 9 | 1 in 11,273 |
| Michigan | #459 | 7 | 1 in 12,371 |
| California | #492 | 14 | 1 in 10,023 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alonzo
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 1 spot since 2024 (#512 → #511)
- 34 spots since 2020 (#477 → #511)
- 16 spots since 2015 (#527 → #511)
- Biggest jump: 68 spots in 2013 (#568 → #500)
- Biggest drop: 69 spots in 2009 (#543 → #612)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #110 (122 births)
- Births halved by 1903, 23 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 855
- Highest: 1 in 855 boys born in 1882 were named Alonzo (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,895 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #110 in 1880, was only 1 in 906 (0.11%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 11.4% of all boys named Alonzo (5,251) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,088 | #110 (1880) | #126 |
| 1890s | 879 | #150 (1894) | #173 |
| 1900s | 808 | #182 (1900) | #218 |
| 1910s | 2,218 | #223 (1911) | #295 |
| 1920s | 2,986 | #310 (1924) | #336 |
| 1930s | 2,434 | #333 (1932) | #353 |
| 1940s | 2,647 | #357 (1940) | #386 |
| 1950s | 3,966 | #348 (1953) | #363 |
| 1960s | 4,395 | #336 (1962) | #373 |
| 1970s | 3,490 | #394 (1971) | #428 |
| 1980s | 3,619 | #421 (1988) | #457 |
| 1990s | 4,262 | #465 (1994) | #493 |
| 2000s | 4,329 | #516 (2000) | #552 |
| 2010s | 5,251 | #469 (2019) | #529 |
| 2020s | 3,583 | #471 (2022) | #504 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Alonzo in 1952
boys
#364
341 births · 1 in 5,700 boys
Top boys' names in 1952
More about 1952
boys
1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 5,700 of them was named Alonzo, which outranked 91.4% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).