Alonzo
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #9,244 · #511 for boys in 2025, 590 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 122 births
- Debut · boys
- 122 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 45,955since 1880
Alonzo over time
Rank among boys' names. Alonzo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #511 | 590 | |
| 2024 | — | #512 | 595 | |
| 2023 | — | #535 | 552 | |
| 2022 | — | #471 | 651 | |
| 2021 | — | #515 | 569 | |
| 2020 | — | #477 | 626 | |
| 2019 | — | #469 | 634 | |
| 2018 | — | #476 | 612 | |
| 2017 | — | #522 | 549 | |
| 2016 | — | #565 | 499 | |
| 2015 | — | #527 | 542 | |
| 2014 | — | #528 | 527 | |
| 2013 | — | #500 | 545 | |
| 2012 | — | #568 | 454 | |
| 2011 | — | #558 | 455 | |
| 2010 | — | #581 | 434 | |
| 2009 | — | #612 | 412 | |
| 2008 | — | #543 | 483 | |
| 2007 | — | #588 | 432 | |
| 2006 | — | #559 | 450 | |
| 2005 | — | #537 | 452 | |
| 2004 | — | #547 | 421 | |
| 2003 | — | #533 | 436 | |
| 2002 | — | #523 | 433 | |
| 2001 | — | #559 | 375 | |
| 2000 | — | #516 | 435 | |
| 1999 | — | #519 | 410 | |
| 1998 | — | #526 | 394 | |
| 1997 | — | #479 | 450 | |
| 1996 | — | #507 | 407 | |
| 1995 | — | #477 | 453 | |
| 1994 | — | #465 | 469 | |
| 1993 | — | #494 | 421 | |
| 1992 | — | #506 | 398 | |
| 1991 | — | #476 | 428 | |
| 1990 | — | #476 | 432 | |
| 1989 | — | #455 | 426 | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | #421 | 460 |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | #441 | 406 |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #452 | 371 |
| 1985 | — | #488 | 315 | |
| 1984 | — | #470 | 321 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #466 | 322 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #469 | 325 |
| 1981 | #9,110 | 6 | #473 | 310 |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #431 | 363 |
| 1979 | — | #444 | 334 | |
| 1978 | — | #483 | 282 | |
| 1977 | — | #416 | 360 | |
| 1976 | — | #450 | 301 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #432 | 331 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #430 | 336 |
| 1973 | — | #413 | 357 | |
| 1972 | #7,292 | 6 | #411 | 368 |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #394 | 418 |
| 1970 | #6,362 | 7 | #402 | 403 |
| 1969 | — | #385 | 414 | |
| 1968 | — | #397 | 385 | |
| 1967 | — | #371 | 405 | |
| 1966 | — | #389 | 384 | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #376 | 422 |
| 1964 | — | #369 | 449 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #370 | 458 |
| 1962 | — | #336 | 538 | |
| 1961 | #4,882 | 8 | #366 | 476 |
| 1960 | #6,390 | 5 | #367 | 464 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #375 | 443 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #362 | 454 |
| 1957 | #6,086 | 5 | #400 | 377 |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #360 | 418 |
| 1955 | #4,376 | 8 | #354 | 415 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #366 | 375 |
| 1953 | — | #348 | 396 | |
| 1952 | — | #364 | 341 | |
| 1951 | — | #348 | 383 | |
| 1950 | — | #353 | 364 | |
| 1949 | — | #390 | 297 | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #360 | 350 |
| 1947 | — | #396 | 300 | |
| 1946 | — | #400 | 259 | |
| 1945 | — | #408 | 219 | |
| 1944 | — | #396 | 235 | |
| 1943 | — | #378 | 263 | |
| 1942 | — | #387 | 245 | |
| 1941 | — | #384 | 223 | |
| 1940 | — | #357 | 256 | |
| 1939 | — | #352 | 249 | |
| 1938 | — | #368 | 233 | |
| 1937 | — | #358 | 226 | |
| 1936 | — | #380 | 207 | |
| 1935 | — | #354 | 240 | |
| 1934 | — | #345 | 253 | |
| 1933 | — | #335 | 252 | |
| 1932 | — | #333 | 271 | |
| 1931 | — | #368 | 235 | |
| 1930 | — | #340 | 268 | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 | #372 | 239 |
| 1928 | — | #350 | 265 | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #338 | 287 |
| 1926 | — | #335 | 298 | |
| 1925 | — | #336 | 295 | |
| 1924 | — | #310 | 340 | |
| 1923 | — | #327 | 319 | |
| 1922 | — | #321 | 320 | |
| 1921 | — | #335 | 315 | |
| 1920 | — | #332 | 308 | |
| 1919 | — | #309 | 321 | |
| 1918 | — | #336 | 287 | |
| 1917 | — | #319 | 286 | |
| 1916 | — | #315 | 274 | |
| 1915 | — | #318 | 267 | |
| 1914 | — | #318 | 204 | |
| 1913 | — | #293 | 184 | |
| 1912 | — | #263 | 177 | |
| 1911 | — | #223 | 128 | |
| 1910 | — | #254 | 90 | |
| 1909 | — | #223 | 95 | |
| 1908 | — | #287 | 57 | |
| 1907 | — | #224 | 82 | |
| 1906 | — | #205 | 85 | |
| 1905 | — | #190 | 93 | |
| 1904 | — | #211 | 76 | |
| 1903 | — | #248 | 56 | |
| 1902 | — | #199 | 81 | |
| 1901 | — | #208 | 67 | |
| 1900 | — | #182 | 116 | |
| 1899 | — | #180 | 78 | |
| 1898 | — | #161 | 104 | |
| 1897 | — | #181 | 84 | |
| 1896 | — | #182 | 89 | |
| 1895 | — | #185 | 85 | |
| 1894 | — | #150 | 102 | |
| 1893 | — | #201 | 71 | |
| 1892 | — | #154 | 104 | |
| 1891 | — | #175 | 74 | |
| 1890 | — | #161 | 88 | |
| 1889 | — | #141 | 102 | |
| 1888 | — | #139 | 110 | |
| 1887 | — | #144 | 88 | |
| 1886 | — | #128 | 106 | |
| 1885 | — | #130 | 104 | |
| 1884 | — | #128 | 112 | |
| 1883 | — | #123 | 100 | |
| 1882 | — | #111 | 133 | |
| 1881 | — | #110 | 111 | |
| 1880 | — | #110 | 122 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Alonzo was already there! It came in at #110, and was given to 122 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1901–1904, when fewer than 82 boys a year got the name.
Where Alonzo is popular in 1954
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- District of Columbia#170 · 1 in 1,218
- South Carolina#209 · 1 in 1,494
- Maryland#220 · 1 in 2,511
- Florida#237 · 1 in 2,047
- Arkansas#244 · 1 in 2,097
Best ever in a state: #72 in West Virginia, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #170 | 12 | 1 in 1,218 |
| South Carolina | #209 | 21 | 1 in 1,494 |
| Maryland | #220 | 12 | 1 in 2,511 |
| Florida | #237 | 20 | 1 in 2,047 |
| Arkansas | #244 | 10 | 1 in 2,097 |
| Georgia | #246 | 23 | 1 in 2,110 |
| Virginia | #254 | 18 | 1 in 2,434 |
| Tennessee | #268 | 14 | 1 in 2,973 |
| Alabama | #270 | 16 | 1 in 2,425 |
| Louisiana | #281 | 17 | 1 in 2,370 |
| Mississippi | #283 | 11 | 1 in 2,668 |
| North Carolina | #311 | 16 | 1 in 3,446 |
| Illinois | #320 | 21 | 1 in 5,057 |
| New Jersey | #333 | 7 | 1 in 8,022 |
| Pennsylvania | #340 | 15 | 1 in 8,035 |
| Texas | #348 | 40 | 1 in 3,029 |
| Indiana | #349 | 8 | 1 in 6,560 |
| Michigan | #366 | 13 | 1 in 7,195 |
| New York | #372 | 24 | 1 in 7,085 |
| Missouri | #378 | 7 | 1 in 6,686 |
| Ohio | #406 | 11 | 1 in 9,931 |
| California | #516 | 15 | 1 in 10,241 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Alonzo
- 1 spot since 2024 (#512 → #511)
- 34 spots since 2020 (#477 → #511)
- 16 spots since 2015 (#527 → #511)
- Biggest jump: 68 spots in 2013 (#568 → #500)
- Biggest drop: 69 spots in 2009 (#543 → #612)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #110 (122 births)
- Births halved by 1903, 23 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 855 boys born in 1882 were named Alonzo (0.12%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,895 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #110 in 1880, was only 1 in 906 (0.11%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 11.4% of all boys named Alonzo (5,251) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,088 | #110 (1880) | #126 |
| 1890s | 879 | #150 (1894) | #173 |
| 1900s | 808 | #182 (1900) | #218 |
| 1910s | 2,218 | #223 (1911) | #295 |
| 1920s | 2,986 | #310 (1924) | #336 |
| 1930s | 2,434 | #333 (1932) | #353 |
| 1940s | 2,647 | #357 (1940) | #386 |
| 1950s | 3,966 | #348 (1953) | #363 |
| 1960s | 4,395 | #336 (1962) | #373 |
| 1970s | 3,490 | #394 (1971) | #428 |
| 1980s | 3,619 | #421 (1988) | #457 |
| 1990s | 4,262 | #465 (1994) | #493 |
| 2000s | 4,329 | #516 (2000) | #552 |
| 2010s | 5,251 | #469 (2019) | #529 |
| 2020s | 3,583 | #471 (2022) | #504 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Alonzo in 1954
Top girls' names in 1954
Top boys' names in 1954
More about 1954
girls
1,941,915 girls got a published name in 1954; 1 in 388,383 of them was named Alonzo, which outranked 13.2% of the 6,625 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Tied with 872 names at #5,753; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,038,751 boys got a published name in 1954; 1 in 5,437 of them was named Alonzo, which outranked 91.6% of the 4,360 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.5% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- ↓ 504Arlin#878 → #1,382
- ↓ 347Adan#895 → #1,242
- ↓ 345Dayton#966 → #1,311
- ↓ 302Garey#966 → #1,268
- ↓ 293Bartholomew#975 → #1,268
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.