Amada
#3,517 for girls in 2025, 43 births
- Peak · girls
- 1898 · 9 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,533since 1890
Amada over time
Rank among girls' names. Amada has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #3,517 | 43 |
| 2024 | #3,459 | 45 |
| 2023 | #3,911 | 38 |
| 2022 | #3,536 | 44 |
| 2021 | #3,883 | 38 |
| 2020 | #3,281 | 47 |
| 2019 | #3,172 | 50 |
| 2018 | #3,245 | 49 |
| 2017 | #4,811 | 28 |
| 2016 | #5,445 | 24 |
| 2015 | #6,036 | 21 |
| 2014 | #6,207 | 20 |
| 2013 | #9,036 | 12 |
| 2012 | #6,576 | 19 |
| 2011 | #5,935 | 22 |
| 2010 | #6,382 | 20 |
| 2009 | #6,811 | 19 |
| 2008 | #5,142 | 28 |
| 2007 | #5,895 | 23 |
| 2006 | #5,545 | 24 |
| 2005 | #6,820 | 17 |
| 2004 | #4,707 | 28 |
| 2003 | #5,586 | 21 |
| 2002 | #4,280 | 29 |
| 2001 | #5,570 | 20 |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 |
| 1999 | #3,718 | 32 |
| 1998 | #3,914 | 29 |
| 1997 | #3,897 | 28 |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 |
| 1995 | #4,846 | 20 |
| 1994 | #5,016 | 19 |
| 1993 | #3,506 | 31 |
| 1992 | #3,343 | 33 |
| 1991 | #3,540 | 30 |
| 1990 | #3,156 | 35 |
| 1989 | #3,566 | 28 |
| 1988 | #2,987 | 34 |
| 1987 | #2,915 | 33 |
| 1986 | #3,645 | 23 |
| 1985 | #2,939 | 31 |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 |
| 1983 | #2,398 | 39 |
| 1982 | #2,369 | 41 |
| 1981 | #3,532 | 23 |
| 1980 | #3,411 | 24 |
| 1979 | #3,333 | 24 |
| 1978 | #3,009 | 26 |
| 1977 | #3,002 | 26 |
| 1976 | #3,540 | 19 |
| 1975 | #5,516 | 10 |
| 1974 | #3,426 | 19 |
| 1973 | #3,481 | 18 |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 |
| 1971 | #2,874 | 24 |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 |
| 1968 | #3,315 | 16 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 |
| 1965 | #4,494 | 9 |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 |
| 1963 | #3,458 | 14 |
| 1962 | #3,293 | 15 |
| 1961 | #3,318 | 15 |
| 1960 | #3,212 | 15 |
| 1959 | #3,827 | 11 |
| 1958 | #2,663 | 19 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 |
| 1956 | #3,321 | 13 |
| 1955 | #3,377 | 12 |
| 1954 | #3,718 | 10 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 |
| 1952 | #3,552 | 10 |
| 1951 | #2,245 | 20 |
| 1950 | #3,423 | 10 |
| 1949 | #2,514 | 16 |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 |
| 1947 | #2,530 | 16 |
| 1946 | #2,318 | 17 |
| 1945 | #2,060 | 17 |
| 1944 | #2,401 | 14 |
| 1943 | #2,251 | 16 |
| 1942 | #3,444 | 8 |
| 1941 | #2,018 | 17 |
| 1940 | #2,029 | 16 |
| 1939 | #2,038 | 16 |
| 1938 | #2,021 | 16 |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 |
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 |
| 1935 | #1,845 | 18 |
| 1934 | #1,651 | 21 |
| 1933 | #1,606 | 22 |
| 1932 | #2,490 | 12 |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 |
| 1930 | #1,607 | 24 |
| 1929 | #1,642 | 23 |
| 1928 | #1,425 | 30 |
| 1927 | #1,619 | 26 |
| 1926 | #1,667 | 25 |
| 1925 | #1,647 | 26 |
| 1924 | #1,566 | 29 |
| 1923 | #1,490 | 30 |
| 1922 | #2,479 | 14 |
| 1921 | #1,867 | 22 |
| 1920 | #2,590 | 13 |
| 1919 | #2,063 | 17 |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 |
| 1917 | #3,092 | 9 |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 |
| 1915 | #2,050 | 15 |
| 1914 | #2,125 | 11 |
| 1913 | #2,034 | 10 |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 |
| 1909 | #2,208 | 5 |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 |
| 1903 | #1,318 | 8 |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 |
| 1898 | #1,171 | 9 |
| 1897 | #1,263 | 7 |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 |
| 1894 | #1,353 | 6 |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | #1,210 | 6 |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Amada! It came in at #1,210, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1891–1893, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Amada is popular in 1938
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#525 · 1 in 4,439
Best ever in a state: #134 in New Mexico, 1923.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #525 | 13 | 1 in 4,439 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amada
- 58 spots since 2024 (#3,459 → #3,517)
- 236 spots since 2020 (#3,281 → #3,517)
- 2,519 spots since 2015 (#6,036 → #3,517)
- Debuted 1890
- Peaked 1898 at #1,171 (9 births)
- Births halved by 1901, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 28,752 girls born in 1898 were named Amada (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 37,378 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 12.4% of all girls named Amada (314) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 39 | #1,171 (1898) | #1,337 |
| 1900s | 41 | #1,318 (1903) | #1,787 |
| 1910s | 109 | #1,719 (1912) | #2,283 |
| 1920s | 238 | #1,425 (1928) | #1,799 |
| 1930s | 157 | #1,606 (1933) | #2,218 |
| 1940s | 146 | #2,018 (1941) | #2,516 |
| 1950s | 131 | #2,245 (1951) | #3,263 |
| 1960s | 140 | #2,937 (1966) | #3,562 |
| 1970s | 191 | #2,874 (1971) | #3,714 |
| 1980s | 314 | #2,369 (1982) | #3,023 |
| 1990s | 275 | #3,156 (1990) | #4,022 |
| 2000s | 232 | #4,280 (2002) | #5,534 |
| 2010s | 265 | #3,172 (2019) | #5,685 |
| 2020s | 255 | #3,281 (2020) | #3,598 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amada in 1938
Top girls' names in 1938
More about 1938
girls
1,103,456 girls got a published name in 1938; 1 in 68,966 of them was named Amada, which outranked 59.5% of the 4,995 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,945Wynema17
- #1,945Yvonna17
- #1,945Zulema17
- #2,021Amada16
- #2,021Agness16
- #2,021Albina16
- #2,021Annita16
- #2,113Alena15
- #2,113Alfredia15
- #2,113Alvena15
Tied with 91 names at #2,021; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.