Amara
- #98 for girls in 2025, 2,630 births
- #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
- Given to girls 99.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 2,630 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 28,982since 1961
Amara over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #98 | 2,630 | #8,243 | 9 |
| 2024 | #121 | 2,296 | #6,832 | 12 |
| 2023 | #123 | 2,282 | #5,470 | 17 |
| 2022 | #141 | 2,049 | #6,479 | 13 |
| 2021 | #142 | 1,924 | #7,089 | 11 |
| 2020 | #142 | 1,920 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #140 | 1,998 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #189 | 1,588 | #5,770 | 15 |
| 2017 | #206 | 1,500 | #7,546 | 10 |
| 2016 | #301 | 1,085 | #7,157 | 11 |
| 2015 | #459 | 691 | #5,746 | 15 |
| 2014 | #511 | 607 | #7,562 | 10 |
| 2013 | #578 | 497 | #7,026 | 11 |
| 2012 | #571 | 514 | #9,709 | 7 |
| 2011 | #587 | 491 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #654 | 447 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #586 | 516 | #10,994 | 6 |
| 2008 | #576 | 535 | #9,019 | 8 |
| 2007 | #577 | 522 | #6,262 | 13 |
| 2006 | #573 | 511 | #10,662 | 6 |
| 2005 | #571 | 501 | #6,634 | 11 |
| 2004 | #607 | 456 | #7,536 | 9 |
| 2003 | #652 | 406 | #8,643 | 7 |
| 2002 | #790 | 297 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #870 | 263 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #796 | 287 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #1,033 | 197 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #1,078 | 180 | #5,466 | 11 |
| 1997 | #1,110 | 169 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,215 | 146 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | #1,229 | 139 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,400 | 115 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,518 | 103 | #7,638 | 6 |
| 1992 | #1,422 | 114 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,463 | 108 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,253 | 131 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,750 | 77 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,863 | 66 | #5,751 | 7 |
| 1987 | #1,748 | 68 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,838 | 61 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,809 | 62 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,574 | 36 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,135 | 46 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,492 | 38 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,488 | 38 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,866 | 31 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,860 | 30 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,679 | 14 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,909 | 27 | — | |
| 1976 | #3,287 | 21 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,811 | 26 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,556 | 29 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,155 | 14 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,543 | 17 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,373 | 19 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,577 | 17 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,418 | 11 | — | |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 | — | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1961
The first year at least five girls were named Amara! It came in at #6,567, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1961–1966, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Amara is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#31 · 1 in 180
- District of Columbia#73 · 1 in 224
- Oregon#74 · 1 in 326
- Vermont#75 · 1 in 195
- Florida#76 · 1 in 417
Best ever in a state: #25 in New Mexico, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #31 | 26 | 1 in 180 |
| District of Columbia | #73 | 9 | 1 in 224 |
| Oregon | #74 | 40 | 1 in 326 |
| Vermont | #75 | 5 | 1 in 195 |
| Florida | #76 | 208 | 1 in 417 |
| Hawaii | #78 | 9 | 1 in 238 |
| Colorado | #79 | 61 | 1 in 382 |
| Montana | #79 | 11 | 1 in 257 |
| Arizona | #82 | 68 | 1 in 415 |
| West Virginia | #83 | 17 | 1 in 298 |
| Indiana | #87 | 70 | 1 in 399 |
| Utah | #88 | 48 | 1 in 356 |
| Oklahoma | #91 | 38 | 1 in 389 |
| California | #92 | 327 | 1 in 495 |
| Nevada | #92 | 22 | 1 in 418 |
| Texas | #92 | 299 | 1 in 537 |
| Kentucky | #93 | 44 | 1 in 392 |
| Georgia | #95 | 90 | 1 in 502 |
| Illinois | #95 | 90 | 1 in 493 |
| New Hampshire | #95 | 12 | 1 in 316 |
| Washington | #95 | 64 | 1 in 451 |
| Connecticut | #102 | 27 | 1 in 426 |
| Arkansas | #106 | 26 | 1 in 407 |
| Kansas | #112 | 28 | 1 in 422 |
| Missouri | #113 | 52 | 1 in 467 |
| South Carolina | #114 | 38 | 1 in 481 |
| Ohio | #119 | 89 | 1 in 531 |
| Maryland | #120 | 37 | 1 in 540 |
| Pennsylvania | #120 | 84 | 1 in 556 |
| Rhode Island | #120 | 7 | 1 in 350 |
| Michigan | #122 | 67 | 1 in 533 |
| New York | #123 | 125 | 1 in 627 |
| Massachusetts | #124 | 43 | 1 in 559 |
| Mississippi | #124 | 19 | 1 in 468 |
| New Jersey | #129 | 60 | 1 in 592 |
| Alaska | #134 | 5 | 1 in 331 |
| Minnesota | #138 | 39 | 1 in 551 |
| North Carolina | #139 | 71 | 1 in 655 |
| South Dakota | #139 | 8 | 1 in 381 |
| Wisconsin | #142 | 37 | 1 in 548 |
| Tennessee | #145 | 51 | 1 in 629 |
| Alabama | #151 | 28 | 1 in 654 |
| Louisiana | #152 | 27 | 1 in 606 |
| Maine | #153 | 7 | 1 in 445 |
| Iowa | #159 | 20 | 1 in 589 |
| Delaware | #167 | 5 | 1 in 451 |
| Nebraska | #169 | 13 | 1 in 546 |
| Virginia | #200 | 41 | 1 in 823 |
| Idaho | #244 | 9 | 1 in 796 |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amara
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 44 spots since 2020 (#142 → #98)
- Biggest jump: 237 spots in 2000
- Biggest drop: 74 spots in 2001
Rise & fade · girls
64 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1961
- Peaked 2025 at #98 (2,630 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 1 yr
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 2025
- Top 1,000: 26 yrs · run 2000–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 611
- Highest: 1 in 611 girls born in 2025 were named Amara (0.16%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 45.2% of all girls named Amara (13,101) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30 | #4,418 (1969) | #5,544 |
| 1970s | 214 | #2,556 (1974) | #3,375 |
| 1980s | 523 | #1,748 (1987) | #2,156 |
| 1990s | 1,402 | #1,033 (1999) | #1,272 |
| 2000s | 4,294 | #571 (2005) | #660 |
| 2010s | 9,418 | #140 (2019) | #420 |
| 2020s | 13,101 | #98 (2025) | #128 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Amara ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: