Amaris
- #754 for girls in 2025, 360 births
- #2,183 for boys in 2025, 65 births
- Given to girls 92.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2016 · 379 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,422since 1968
Amaris over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #754 | 360 | #2,183 | 65 |
| 2024 | #856 | 316 | #2,236 | 64 |
| 2023 | #912 | 291 | #1,735 | 95 |
| 2022 | #910 | 301 | #1,574 | 112 |
| 2021 | #931 | 285 | #2,300 | 60 |
| 2020 | #895 | 296 | #2,392 | 55 |
| 2019 | #813 | 336 | #3,496 | 32 |
| 2018 | #860 | 315 | #4,094 | 25 |
| 2017 | #860 | 318 | #4,746 | 20 |
| 2016 | #751 | 379 | #3,776 | 28 |
| 2015 | #791 | 356 | #3,513 | 31 |
| 2014 | #1,036 | 250 | #6,307 | 13 |
| 2013 | #1,046 | 236 | #5,923 | 14 |
| 2012 | #1,075 | 232 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #1,036 | 240 | #12,287 | 5 |
| 2010 | #1,004 | 250 | #7,087 | 11 |
| 2009 | #1,012 | 261 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #983 | 271 | #6,763 | 12 |
| 2007 | #964 | 279 | #7,094 | 11 |
| 2006 | #910 | 290 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #982 | 249 | #8,299 | 8 |
| 2004 | #824 | 301 | #6,976 | 10 |
| 2003 | #990 | 233 | #6,715 | 10 |
| 2002 | #1,068 | 199 | #7,643 | 8 |
| 2001 | #1,177 | 174 | #6,935 | 9 |
| 2000 | #1,217 | 163 | #6,839 | 9 |
| 1999 | #1,238 | 152 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | #1,242 | 146 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,105 | 170 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,194 | 151 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,439 | 112 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,236 | 140 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,194 | 145 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #1,264 | 135 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,290 | 129 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,568 | 97 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,383 | 109 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,446 | 95 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,433 | 91 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,736 | 67 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,172 | 48 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,272 | 42 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,288 | 43 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,409 | 40 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,154 | 47 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,430 | 38 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,431 | 36 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,307 | 39 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,052 | 23 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,212 | 21 | — | |
| 1973 | #4,362 | 13 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,894 | 15 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,061 | 10 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,456 | 8 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1968
The first year at least five girls were named Amaris! It came in at #7,016, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1968, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Amaris is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#100 · 1 in 359
- Texas#471 · 1 in 2,327
- Maryland#511 · 1 in 1,999
- California#530 · 1 in 2,608
- Illinois#541 · 1 in 2,463
Best ever in a state: #100 in New Mexico, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #100 | 13 | 1 in 359 |
| Texas | #471 | 69 | 1 in 2,327 |
| Maryland | #511 | 10 | 1 in 1,999 |
| California | #530 | 62 | 1 in 2,608 |
| Illinois | #541 | 18 | 1 in 2,463 |
| Oregon | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,175 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,362 |
| Wisconsin | #612 | 7 | 1 in 2,894 |
| Oklahoma | #619 | 6 | 1 in 2,463 |
| Arizona | #632 | 10 | 1 in 2,822 |
| Florida | #651 | 26 | 1 in 3,337 |
| Colorado | #789 | 6 | 1 in 3,888 |
| New York | #790 | 20 | 1 in 3,916 |
| Alabama | #819 | 5 | 1 in 3,664 |
| North Carolina | #834 | 11 | 1 in 4,226 |
| Washington | #915 | 6 | 1 in 4,810 |
| Missouri | #926 | 5 | 1 in 4,860 |
| Michigan | #1,061 | 6 | 1 in 5,955 |
| Tennessee | #1,127 | 5 | 1 in 6,415 |
| Pennsylvania | #1,231 | 6 | 1 in 7,781 |
| Ohio | #1,271 | 6 | 1 in 7,878 |
| Georgia | #1,533 | 5 | 1 in 9,042 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amaris
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 141 spots since 2020 (#895 → #754)
- Biggest jump: 245 spots in 2015
- Biggest drop: 158 spots in 2005
Rise & fade · girls
48 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1968
- Peaked 2016 at #751 (379 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 17 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 17 yrs · run 2015–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 4,465
- Highest: 1 in 4,465 girls born in 2025 were named Amaris (0.02%)
- Its best rank, #751 in 2016, was only 1 in 4,676 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 30.9% of all girls named Amaris (2,912) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13 | #5,456 (1969) | #6,236 |
| 1970s | 231 | #2,307 (1977) | #3,508 |
| 1980s | 620 | #1,383 (1989) | #1,976 |
| 1990s | 1,377 | #1,105 (1997) | #1,277 |
| 2000s | 2,420 | #824 (2004) | #1,013 |
| 2010s | 2,912 | #751 (2016) | #927 |
| 2020s | 1,849 | #754 (2025) | #876 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Amaris ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: