Amaya
- #180 for girls in 2025, 1,723 births
- Last seen for boys in 2017 at #12,246
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2018 · 2,280 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 43,525since 1972
Amaya over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Amaya has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #180 | 1,723 | — | |
| 2024 | #168 | 1,817 | — | |
| 2023 | #162 | 1,758 | — | |
| 2022 | #169 | 1,724 | — | |
| 2021 | #161 | 1,783 | — | |
| 2020 | #139 | 1,939 | — | |
| 2019 | #133 | 2,063 | — | |
| 2018 | #129 | 2,280 | — | |
| 2017 | #176 | 1,718 | #12,246 | 5 |
| 2016 | #204 | 1,590 | — | |
| 2015 | #214 | 1,528 | #12,086 | 5 |
| 2014 | #237 | 1,368 | — | |
| 2013 | #234 | 1,368 | #12,136 | 5 |
| 2012 | #212 | 1,477 | — | |
| 2011 | #209 | 1,486 | — | |
| 2010 | #226 | 1,395 | — | |
| 2009 | #202 | 1,598 | — | |
| 2008 | #199 | 1,679 | — | |
| 2007 | #201 | 1,699 | — | |
| 2006 | #215 | 1,594 | — | |
| 2005 | #226 | 1,513 | — | |
| 2004 | #209 | 1,619 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #181 | 1,769 | — | |
| 2002 | #283 | 1,099 | — | |
| 2001 | #295 | 1,056 | — | |
| 2000 | #196 | 1,632 | — | |
| 1999 | #398 | 704 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,458 | 117 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,696 | 92 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,207 | 61 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,152 | 36 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,615 | 30 | — | |
| 1993 | #3,987 | 26 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,718 | 16 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | — | |
| 1990 | #7,303 | 11 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,531 | 12 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,031 | 11 | — | |
| 1984 | #7,398 | 8 | — | |
| 1983 | #5,457 | 12 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,716 | 15 | — | |
| 1981 | #7,409 | 8 | — | |
| 1980 | #10,392 | 5 | — | |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | #8,444 | 6 | — | |
| 1976 | #8,156 | 6 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five girls were named Amaya! It came in at #8,292, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1972–1975, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Amaya is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- New Mexico#76 · 1 in 292
- Oregon#93 · 1 in 384
- Florida#93 · 1 in 499
- Nevada#95 · 1 in 438
- California#110 · 1 in 597
Best ever in a state: #22 in New Mexico, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #76 | 16 | 1 in 292 |
| Florida | #93 | 174 | 1 in 499 |
| Oregon | #93 | 34 | 1 in 384 |
| Nevada | #95 | 21 | 1 in 438 |
| California | #110 | 271 | 1 in 597 |
| Washington | #112 | 56 | 1 in 515 |
| Massachusetts | #115 | 45 | 1 in 534 |
| Connecticut | #120 | 24 | 1 in 479 |
| Arizona | #124 | 50 | 1 in 564 |
| New York | #141 | 117 | 1 in 669 |
| Idaho | #142 | 14 | 1 in 512 |
| Illinois | #142 | 69 | 1 in 642 |
| Rhode Island | #150 | 6 | 1 in 409 |
| New Jersey | #163 | 49 | 1 in 724 |
| Hawaii | #168 | 5 | 1 in 429 |
| Colorado | #179 | 33 | 1 in 707 |
| Texas | #192 | 173 | 1 in 928 |
| Indiana | #197 | 35 | 1 in 797 |
| Nebraska | #200 | 11 | 1 in 645 |
| Virginia | #212 | 39 | 1 in 865 |
| Kentucky | #216 | 21 | 1 in 821 |
| Maryland | #225 | 23 | 1 in 869 |
| Pennsylvania | #228 | 49 | 1 in 953 |
| Georgia | #237 | 44 | 1 in 1,027 |
| Tennessee | #244 | 32 | 1 in 1,002 |
| Oklahoma | #247 | 16 | 1 in 924 |
| Iowa | #248 | 14 | 1 in 841 |
| Wisconsin | #253 | 21 | 1 in 965 |
| Louisiana | #254 | 17 | 1 in 963 |
| Utah | #260 | 17 | 1 in 1,005 |
| Ohio | #264 | 42 | 1 in 1,126 |
| West Virginia | #273 | 6 | 1 in 846 |
| Missouri | #277 | 22 | 1 in 1,105 |
| North Carolina | #280 | 39 | 1 in 1,192 |
| Minnesota | #285 | 19 | 1 in 1,130 |
| South Carolina | #294 | 17 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Arkansas | #301 | 10 | 1 in 1,059 |
| Michigan | #330 | 27 | 1 in 1,323 |
| Kansas | #361 | 9 | 1 in 1,312 |
| Alabama | #633 | 7 | 1 in 2,617 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amaya
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 41 spots since 2020 (#139 → #180)
- 34 spots since 2015 (#214 → #180)
- Biggest jump: 1,060 spots in 1999
- Biggest drop: 99 spots in 2001
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2018 at #129 (2,280 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 27 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 27 yrs · run 1999–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 746
- Highest: 1 in 746 girls born in 2018 were named Amaya (0.13%)
- Latest: 1 in 933 girls born in 2025 (0.11%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 37.4% of all girls named Amaya (16,273) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 40 | #6,385 (1978) | #7,840 |
| 1980s | 104 | #4,716 (1982) | #6,714 |
| 1990s | 1,106 | #398 (1999) | #3,612 |
| 2000s | 15,258 | #181 (2003) | #221 |
| 2010s | 16,273 | #129 (2018) | #197 |
| 2020s | 10,744 | #139 (2020) | #163 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Amaya ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: