Amil
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #15,293 · #5,861 for boys in 2025, 15 births
Given to boys 78.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1886 · 5 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 982since 1886
Amil over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #5,861 | 15 | |
| 2024 | #15,293 | 5 | #4,321 | 24 |
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | #3,228 | 37 |
| 2022 | — | #3,100 | 39 | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | #3,814 | 28 |
| 2020 | — | #2,925 | 40 | |
| 2019 | — | #4,480 | 22 | |
| 2018 | #12,464 | 7 | #4,918 | 19 |
| 2017 | — | #6,685 | 12 | |
| 2016 | — | #4,327 | 23 | |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | #4,711 | 20 |
| 2014 | — | #5,066 | 18 | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #4,313 | 22 |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | #5,482 | 16 |
| 2011 | — | #4,221 | 23 | |
| 2010 | #12,276 | 8 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2009 | #7,679 | 16 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | — | #5,767 | 15 | |
| 2007 | #8,520 | 14 | #5,661 | 15 |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | #5,781 | 14 |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | #6,634 | 11 |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | #5,813 | 13 |
| 2003 | #5,795 | 20 | #4,616 | 17 |
| 2002 | #5,444 | 21 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #3,631 | 36 | #5,667 | 12 |
| 2000 | #2,940 | 48 | #5,040 | 14 |
| 1999 | #9,479 | 9 | #4,537 | 15 |
| 1998 | — | #5,840 | 10 | |
| 1997 | — | #6,618 | 8 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,136 | 7 | |
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | #7,638 | 6 | |
| 1992 | — | #5,660 | 9 | |
| 1991 | — | #7,271 | 6 | |
| 1990 | — | #8,117 | 5 | |
| 1989 | — | #5,615 | 8 | |
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #3,959 | 11 | |
| 1986 | — | #6,721 | 5 | |
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #5,561 | 6 | |
| 1983 | — | #4,907 | 7 | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | #6,262 | 5 | |
| 1980 | — | #5,525 | 6 | |
| 1979 | — | #3,810 | 10 | |
| 1978 | — | #3,857 | 9 | |
| 1977 | — | #5,845 | 5 | |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #4,038 | 5 | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | #3,993 | 5 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #3,329 | 6 | |
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | #3,316 | 6 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,403 | 10 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | #3,560 | 5 | |
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1937 | — | #3,175 | 6 | |
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,529 | 9 | |
| 1934 | — | #3,277 | 6 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | #3,361 | 6 | |
| 1931 | — | #3,390 | 6 | |
| 1930 | — | #3,022 | 8 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,980 | 8 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,522 | 11 | |
| 1927 | — | #2,408 | 12 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,588 | 11 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,867 | 6 | |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | #2,446 | 12 |
| 1922 | — | #1,827 | 19 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,059 | 16 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,694 | 21 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,385 | 12 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,539 | 23 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,280 | 12 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,043 | 14 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,070 | 13 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,271 | 9 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,821 | 5 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,269 | 6 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | #959 | 5 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Amil! It came in at #959, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1886–1911, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Amil is popular in 1918
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#422 · 1 in 6,555
Best ever in a state: #422 in Michigan, 1918.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #422 | 5 | 1 in 6,555 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Amil
- 1,540 spots since 2024 (#4,321 → #5,861)
- 2,936 spots since 2020 (#2,925 → #5,861)
- 1,150 spots since 2015 (#4,711 → #5,861)
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 1886 at #959 (5 births)
- Births halved by 1887, 1 yr later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 1 yr · 1886
- Highest: 1 in 22,157 boys born in 1886 were named Amil (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 113,872 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 19.2% of all boys named Amil (189) were born in this decade
- Mostly girls until 2009, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #959 (1886) | #959 |
| 1890s | 0 | — | — |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 94 | #1,539 (1918) | #2,210 |
| 1920s | 122 | #1,694 (1920) | #2,610 |
| 1930s | 58 | #2,529 (1935) | #3,177 |
| 1940s | 26 | #2,403 (1946) | #3,253 |
| 1950s | 11 | #3,329 (1950) | #3,661 |
| 1960s | 11 | #3,559 (1967) | #3,799 |
| 1970s | 35 | #3,810 (1979) | #4,708 |
| 1980s | 48 | #3,959 (1987) | #5,507 |
| 1990s | 66 | #4,537 (1999) | #6,602 |
| 2000s | 134 | #4,616 (2003) | #5,787 |
| 2010s | 189 | #4,221 (2011) | #5,024 |
| 2020s | 183 | #2,925 (2020) | #3,875 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Amil in 1918
Top boys' names in 1918
More about 1918
boys
1,013,480 boys got a published name in 1918; 1 in 44,064 of them was named Amil, which outranked 68.0% of the 4,813 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,499Vinton24
- #1,499Westley24
- #1,499Zeno24
- #1,539Amil23
- #1,539Alfons23
- #1,539Amon23
- #1,539Arlis23
- #1,596Albertus22
- #1,596Alston22
- #1,596Alvaro22
Tied with 56 names at #1,539; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.