Anabel

#4,265 for girls in 2025, 33 births · Last seen for boys in 1993 at #8,700
Given to girls 99.6% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1887 · 13 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
9,780
since 1882

Anabel over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Anabel has never cracked the top 600 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201979peak #633, 1887girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#4,26533—
2024#3,57543—
2023#4,87327—
2022#3,31348—
2021#2,84859—
2020#2,71261—
2019#2,56168—
2018#1,925103—
2017#1,752120—
2016#1,560143—
2015#1,411164—
2014#911297—
2013#899285—
2012#967262—
2011#996254—
2010#950270—
2009#1,101232—
2008#961279—
2007#951285—
2006#1,036247—
2005#1,037231—
2004#965248—
2003#1,160186—
2002#1,002219—
2001#1,158180—
2000#1,113183—
1999#1,159168—
1998#1,173160—
1997#1,139164—
1996#1,155157—
1995#1,197143—
1994#1,095164—
1993#1,094165#8,7005
1992#999189—
1991#731284#5,9428
1990#747277#6,4157
1989#795239#4,81110
1988#960173—
1987#1,234115—
1986#1,129128—
1985#1,212114—
1984#1,157117—
1983#1,103124—
1982#1,243105#6,3855
1981#1,068132—
1980#921162—
1979#1,39488—
1978#1,29993—
1977#1,41479—
1976#1,46471—
1975#1,51667—
1974#1,42871—
1973#1,85745—
1972#1,85645—
1971#1,90645—
1970#2,16037—
1969#2,13435—
1968#2,36027—
1967#2,21229—
1966#1,91636—
1965#1,71543—
1964#1,94737—
1963#2,06133—
1962#2,31227—
1961#3,06017—
1960#2,30726—
1959#3,10415—
1958#2,66319—
1957#2,48621—
1956#2,38922—
1955#2,72517—
1954#3,9679—
1953——
1952#3,7969—
1951#4,8336—
1950#3,42310—
1949#3,6129—
1948#5,2435—
1947#4,7646—
1946#4,9605—
1945——
1944#3,1399—
1943#4,1966—
1942#2,81711—
1941#3,0309—
1940#2,73710—
1939#4,2505—
1938#4,3425—
1937#3,4347—
1936#3,1038—
1935#2,73110—
1934#2,18714—
1933#1,97016—
1932#2,13015—
1931#1,68621—
1930#1,87519—
1929#2,43713—
1928#1,89720—
1927#1,66925—
1926#1,54128—
1925#2,01819—
1924#1,20643—
1923#1,38833—
1922#1,36634—
1921#1,47631—
1920#1,62626—
1919#1,24237—
1918#1,23437—
1917#1,55224—
1916#1,16737—
1915#1,31729—
1914#1,54118—
1913#1,30819—
1912#1,47714—
1911#1,6569—
1910#1,26713—
1909#1,6078—
1908#1,08414—
1907#1,6397—
1906#96515—
1905#1,2989—
1904#1,17010—
1903#1,4407—
1902#1,2199—
1901——
1900#1,4318—
1899——
1898#1,7005—
1897#1,2637—
1896——
1895#1,2997—
1894#85013—
1893#1,2776—
1892#1,0858—
1891#1,0937—
1890——
1889#1,0257—
1888#1,2765—
1887#63313—
1886#9936—
1885#8427—
1884#1,0245—
1883#7547—
1882#9085—
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1882

The first year at least five girls were named Anabel! It came in at #908, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1890, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Anabel is popular in 1979

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMNIllinois: #966 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 9,337 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #723 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 5,833 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedHITexas: #474 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 3,175 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Anabel, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Texas#474 · 1 in 3,175
  2. California#723 · 1 in 5,833
  3. Illinois#966 · 1 in 9,337

Best ever in a state: #246 in Idaho, 1991.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Texas#474351 in 3,175
California#723281 in 5,833
Illinois#96681 in 9,337
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Anabel
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 690 spots since 2024 (#3,575 → #4,265)
  • 1,553 spots since 2020 (#2,712 → #4,265)
  • 2,854 spots since 2015 (#1,411 → #4,265)
  • Biggest jump: 473 spots in 1980 (#1,394 → #921)
  • Biggest drop: 674 spots in 1907 (#965 → #1,639)
Rise & fade · girls
5 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1882
  • Peaked 1887 at #633 (13 births)
  • Births halved by 1888, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 21 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 21 yrs · run 1988–1992
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,015
  • Highest: 1 in 6,015 girls born in 2014 were named Anabel (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 48,705 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #633 in 1887, was only 1 in 11,229 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 2000s
  • 23.4% of all girls named Anabel (2,290) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s55#633 (1887)#932
1890s53#850 (1894)#1,224
1900s87#965 (1906)#1,317
1910s237#1,167 (1916)#1,376
1920s272#1,206 (1924)#1,662
1930s120#1,686 (1931)#2,771
1940s70#2,737 (1940)#3,833
1950s128#2,389 (1956)#3,265
1960s310#1,715 (1965)#2,202
1970s641#1,299 (1978)#1,629
1980s1,409#795 (1989)#1,082
1990s1,871#731 (1991)#1,049
2000s2,290#951 (2007)#1,048
2010s1,966#899 (2013)#1,393
2020s271#2,712 (2020)#3,598

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Anabel in 1979

girls
#1,394
88 births · 1 in 18,242 girls

Top girls' names in 1979

  1. #1Jennifer56,712
  2. #2Melissa34,050
  3. #3Amanda31,924
  4. #4Jessica27,780
  5. #5Amy21,609
  6. #6Sarah21,015
  7. #7Heather20,834
  8. #8Angela20,256
  9. #9Nicole19,510
  10. #10Michelle19,266
  11. #1,394Anabel88
More about 1979

girls

1,605,268 girls got a published name in 1979; 1 in 18,242 of them was named Anabel, which outranked 88.4% of the 11,972 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Anabel
  1. #1,377Shay89
  2. #1,377Tamisha89
  3. #1,377Tesha89
  4. #1,394Anabel88
  5. #1,394Alishia88
  6. #1,394Blair88
  7. #1,394Carlene88
  8. #1,410Coral87
  9. #1,410Ethel87
  10. #1,410Ilana87

Tied with 15 names at #1,394; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1978
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,593Breanne#2,125 → #532
  2. ↑ 1,527Loni#2,516 → #989
  3. ↑ 1,287Renata#2,012 → #725
  4. ↑ 985Ashanti#1,862 → #877
  5. ↑ 896Nicolette#1,581 → #685
Fallers
  1. ↓ 392Christel#762 → #1,154
  2. ↓ 312Kenisha#557 → #869
  3. ↓ 297Ariane#887 → #1,184
  4. ↓ 285Imelda#947 → #1,232
  5. ↓ 252Farrah#539 → #791

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1979 →