Angelena
Last seen for girls in 2024 at #8,443
- Peak · girls
- 1909 · 10 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 3,205since 1902
Angelena over time
Rank among girls' names. Angelena has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | |
| 2024 | #8,443 | 12 |
| 2023 | #10,312 | 9 |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 |
| 2021 | #6,967 | 16 |
| 2020 | #7,212 | 15 |
| 2019 | #8,138 | 13 |
| 2018 | #7,409 | 15 |
| 2017 | #8,776 | 12 |
| 2016 | #10,113 | 10 |
| 2015 | #5,653 | 23 |
| 2014 | #6,451 | 19 |
| 2013 | #5,143 | 26 |
| 2012 | #4,957 | 28 |
| 2011 | #4,353 | 33 |
| 2010 | #3,961 | 38 |
| 2009 | #2,826 | 62 |
| 2008 | #2,663 | 69 |
| 2007 | #2,509 | 74 |
| 2006 | #2,248 | 85 |
| 2005 | #1,668 | 119 |
| 2004 | #1,643 | 118 |
| 2003 | #1,769 | 106 |
| 2002 | #1,805 | 99 |
| 2001 | #2,064 | 81 |
| 2000 | #2,174 | 73 |
| 1999 | #2,640 | 53 |
| 1998 | #3,116 | 40 |
| 1997 | #2,423 | 54 |
| 1996 | #2,760 | 44 |
| 1995 | #2,845 | 42 |
| 1994 | #3,098 | 37 |
| 1993 | #2,990 | 39 |
| 1992 | #2,386 | 54 |
| 1991 | #2,519 | 49 |
| 1990 | #2,201 | 58 |
| 1989 | #2,442 | 47 |
| 1988 | #2,803 | 37 |
| 1987 | #2,309 | 46 |
| 1986 | #2,620 | 37 |
| 1985 | #2,362 | 42 |
| 1984 | #2,625 | 35 |
| 1983 | #2,097 | 47 |
| 1982 | #1,873 | 57 |
| 1981 | #1,985 | 53 |
| 1980 | #2,218 | 45 |
| 1979 | #1,770 | 61 |
| 1978 | #2,629 | 32 |
| 1977 | #2,091 | 45 |
| 1976 | #2,099 | 41 |
| 1975 | #1,935 | 46 |
| 1974 | #2,172 | 37 |
| 1973 | #2,689 | 26 |
| 1972 | #1,946 | 42 |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 |
| 1970 | #2,395 | 31 |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 |
| 1968 | #2,630 | 23 |
| 1967 | #2,272 | 28 |
| 1966 | #2,249 | 28 |
| 1965 | #1,950 | 35 |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 |
| 1963 | #3,176 | 16 |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 |
| 1961 | #3,189 | 16 |
| 1960 | #2,904 | 18 |
| 1959 | #3,436 | 13 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 |
| 1954 | #3,718 | 10 |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | #4,833 | 6 |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 |
| 1948 | #2,589 | 15 |
| 1947 | #3,240 | 11 |
| 1946 | #3,034 | 11 |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 |
| 1944 | #2,762 | 11 |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | #4,622 | 5 |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 |
| 1935 | #3,156 | 8 |
| 1934 | #3,159 | 8 |
| 1933 | #2,868 | 9 |
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | #4,570 | 5 |
| 1928 | #2,768 | 11 |
| 1927 | #2,552 | 13 |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 |
| 1925 | #1,946 | 20 |
| 1924 | #2,137 | 18 |
| 1923 | #1,944 | 20 |
| 1922 | #2,109 | 18 |
| 1921 | #2,195 | 17 |
| 1920 | #2,015 | 19 |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 |
| 1918 | #1,963 | 19 |
| 1917 | #1,652 | 22 |
| 1916 | #2,368 | 13 |
| 1915 | #2,688 | 10 |
| 1914 | #2,434 | 9 |
| 1913 | #2,331 | 8 |
| 1912 | #2,360 | 7 |
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 |
| 1910 | #2,140 | 6 |
| 1909 | #1,369 | 10 |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,553 | 7 |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Angelena! It came in at #1,793, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1904–1905, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Angelena is popular in 2000
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#1,215 · 1 in 10,406
- Illinois#1,555 · 1 in 14,248
- New York#1,622 · 1 in 14,347
- California#1,874 · 1 in 20,348
Best ever in a state: #640 in Pennsylvania, 1917.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #1,215 | 5 | 1 in 10,406 |
| Illinois | #1,555 | 5 | 1 in 14,248 |
| New York | #1,622 | 7 | 1 in 14,347 |
| California | #1,874 | 11 | 1 in 20,348 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Angelena
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2024
- Debuted 1902
- Peaked 1909 at #1,369 (10 births)
- Births halved by 1911, 2 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 15,528 girls born in 2005 were named Angelena (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 135,016 girls born in 2024 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #1,369 in 1909, was only 1 in 34,723 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 27.6% of all girls named Angelena (886) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 28 | #1,369 (1909) | #1,577 |
| 1910s | 113 | #1,652 (1917) | #2,278 |
| 1920s | 155 | #1,944 (1923) | #2,471 |
| 1930s | 64 | #2,644 (1932) | #3,541 |
| 1940s | 73 | #2,589 (1948) | #3,519 |
| 1950s | 75 | #3,235 (1950) | #4,443 |
| 1960s | 217 | #1,950 (1965) | #2,818 |
| 1970s | 400 | #1,770 (1979) | #2,183 |
| 1980s | 446 | #1,873 (1982) | #2,333 |
| 1990s | 470 | #2,201 (1990) | #2,698 |
| 2000s | 886 | #1,643 (2004) | #2,137 |
| 2010s | 217 | #3,961 (2010) | #6,495 |
| 2020s | 61 | #6,967 (2021) | #8,663 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Angelena in 2000
Top girls' names in 2000
More about 2000
girls
1,816,036 girls got a published name in 2000; 1 in 24,877 of them was named Angelena, which outranked 87.7% of the 17,660 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,158Rosalia74
- #2,158Sheyenne74
- #2,158Siani74
- #2,174Angelena73
- #2,174Aryn73
- #2,174Bianka73
- #2,174Charley73
- #2,190Anabella72
- #2,190Ashlynne72
- #2,190Brianda72
Tied with 15 names at #2,174; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.