Angelique
- #1,192 for girls in 2025, 193 births
- Last seen for boys in 1974 at #4,634
- Given to girls >99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1970 · 942 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 30,164since 1915
Angelique over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Angelique has never cracked the top 300 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it. Not on the chart: 5 girls in 1915 (see the data table).
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,192 | 193 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,086 | 227 | — | |
| 2023 | #996 | 255 | — | |
| 2022 | #843 | 332 | — | |
| 2021 | #875 | 311 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,173 | 198 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,050 | 244 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,024 | 253 | — | |
| 2017 | #799 | 342 | — | |
| 2016 | #668 | 437 | — | |
| 2015 | #569 | 542 | — | |
| 2014 | #414 | 772 | — | |
| 2013 | #541 | 548 | — | |
| 2012 | #389 | 798 | — | |
| 2011 | #381 | 838 | — | |
| 2010 | #626 | 469 | — | |
| 2009 | #743 | 385 | — | |
| 2008 | #682 | 445 | — | |
| 2007 | #425 | 771 | — | |
| 2006 | #682 | 415 | — | |
| 2005 | #667 | 416 | — | |
| 2004 | #603 | 462 | — | |
| 2003 | #538 | 521 | — | |
| 2002 | #498 | 557 | — | |
| 2001 | #472 | 588 | — | |
| 2000 | #466 | 595 | — | |
| 1999 | #484 | 536 | — | |
| 1998 | #470 | 548 | — | |
| 1997 | #428 | 601 | — | |
| 1996 | #456 | 549 | — | |
| 1995 | #469 | 536 | — | |
| 1994 | #459 | 552 | — | |
| 1993 | #383 | 665 | — | |
| 1992 | #313 | 885 | — | |
| 1991 | #538 | 434 | — | |
| 1990 | #631 | 355 | — | |
| 1989 | #629 | 335 | — | |
| 1988 | #598 | 334 | — | |
| 1987 | #611 | 316 | — | |
| 1986 | #616 | 307 | — | |
| 1985 | #589 | 330 | — | |
| 1984 | #550 | 343 | — | |
| 1983 | #518 | 366 | — | |
| 1982 | #462 | 456 | — | |
| 1981 | #475 | 446 | — | |
| 1980 | #460 | 460 | — | |
| 1979 | #435 | 473 | — | |
| 1978 | #458 | 434 | — | |
| 1977 | #402 | 517 | — | |
| 1976 | #423 | 478 | — | |
| 1975 | #375 | 555 | — | |
| 1974 | #368 | 585 | #4,634 | 6 |
| 1973 | #346 | 627 | — | |
| 1972 | #329 | 708 | — | |
| 1971 | #323 | 820 | — | |
| 1970 | #301 | 942 | — | |
| 1969 | #371 | 624 | — | |
| 1968 | #314 | 763 | — | |
| 1967 | #716 | 186 | — | |
| 1966 | #838 | 142 | — | |
| 1965 | #868 | 133 | — | |
| 1964 | #932 | 127 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,047 | 105 | — | |
| 1962 | #974 | 120 | — | |
| 1961 | #895 | 145 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,467 | 56 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,881 | 35 | — | |
| 1958 | #2,322 | 24 | — | |
| 1957 | #2,347 | 23 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,693 | 39 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,463 | 48 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,481 | 46 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,026 | 88 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | — | |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,341 | 18 | — | |
| 1949 | #2,850 | 13 | — | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1915
The first year at least five girls were named Angelique! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1915–1948, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Angelique is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Arizona#515 · 1 in 2,171
- California#616 · 1 in 3,171
- Texas#684 · 1 in 3,649
- Colorado#907 · 1 in 4,665
- Tennessee#983 · 1 in 5,346
Best ever in a state: #75 in New Mexico, 2010.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #515 | 13 | 1 in 2,171 |
| California | #616 | 51 | 1 in 3,171 |
| Texas | #684 | 44 | 1 in 3,649 |
| Colorado | #907 | 5 | 1 in 4,665 |
| Tennessee | #983 | 6 | 1 in 5,346 |
| Illinois | #1,113 | 7 | 1 in 6,333 |
| Georgia | #1,213 | 7 | 1 in 6,458 |
| North Carolina | #1,437 | 5 | 1 in 9,297 |
| New York | #1,526 | 8 | 1 in 9,791 |
| Florida | #1,685 | 7 | 1 in 12,395 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Angelique
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 19 spots since 2020 (#1,173 → #1,192)
- Biggest jump: 572 spots in 1961
- Biggest drop: 257 spots in 2008
Rise & fade · girls
55 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1970 at #301 (942 births)
- Births halved by 1978, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 59 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 59 yrs · run 1964–2017
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,856
- Highest: 1 in 1,856 girls born in 1970 were named Angelique (0.05%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,328 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1970s
- 20.4% of all girls named Angelique (6,139) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | #4,274 (1915) | #4,274 |
| 1920s | 0 | — | — |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 18 | #2,850 (1949) | #3,703 |
| 1950s | 333 | #1,026 (1953) | #2,445 |
| 1960s | 2,401 | #314 (1968) | #842 |
| 1970s | 6,139 | #301 (1970) | #376 |
| 1980s | 3,693 | #460 (1980) | #551 |
| 1990s | 5,661 | #313 (1992) | #463 |
| 2000s | 5,155 | #425 (2007) | #578 |
| 2010s | 5,243 | #381 (2011) | #646 |
| 2020s | 1,516 | #843 (2022) | #1,028 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Angelique ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: