Angelita
#6,546 for girls in 2025, 17 births · Last seen for boys in 1986 at #6,721
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1932 · 129 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,702since 1883
Angelita over time
Rank among girls' names. Angelita has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,546 | 17 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,021 | 26 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,390 | 23 | — | |
| 2022 | #6,229 | 19 | — | |
| 2021 | #5,398 | 23 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,757 | 27 | — | |
| 2019 | #5,798 | 21 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,768 | 28 | — | |
| 2017 | #4,477 | 31 | — | |
| 2016 | #4,734 | 29 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,584 | 30 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,455 | 32 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,703 | 41 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,047 | 37 | — | |
| 2011 | #3,222 | 51 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,256 | 50 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,000 | 57 | — | |
| 2008 | #2,690 | 68 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,248 | 87 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,206 | 87 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,278 | 79 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,087 | 87 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,915 | 95 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,934 | 91 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,726 | 104 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,034 | 81 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,051 | 75 | — | |
| 1998 | #2,146 | 67 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,964 | 73 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,994 | 70 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,880 | 74 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,688 | 88 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,577 | 97 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,392 | 118 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,689 | 87 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,568 | 97 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,587 | 88 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,551 | 85 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,531 | 83 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,505 | 82 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #1,310 | 102 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,153 | 118 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,207 | 106 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,069 | 134 | — | |
| 1981 | #932 | 160 | — | |
| 1980 | #866 | 177 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,074 | 128 | — | |
| 1978 | #898 | 160 | — | |
| 1977 | #943 | 147 | — | |
| 1976 | #872 | 154 | — | |
| 1975 | #774 | 182 | — | |
| 1974 | #770 | 180 | — | |
| 1973 | #874 | 147 | — | |
| 1972 | #784 | 174 | — | |
| 1971 | #848 | 161 | — | |
| 1970 | #821 | 168 | — | |
| 1969 | #903 | 137 | — | |
| 1968 | #754 | 174 | — | |
| 1967 | #886 | 133 | — | |
| 1966 | #830 | 144 | — | |
| 1965 | #798 | 153 | — | |
| 1964 | #896 | 135 | — | |
| 1963 | #947 | 124 | — | |
| 1962 | #952 | 124 | — | |
| 1961 | #914 | 140 | — | |
| 1960 | #854 | 147 | — | |
| 1959 | #860 | 142 | — | |
| 1958 | #761 | 171 | — | |
| 1957 | #936 | 121 | — | |
| 1956 | #914 | 121 | — | |
| 1955 | #938 | 110 | — | |
| 1954 | #827 | 129 | — | |
| 1953 | #857 | 119 | — | |
| 1952 | #752 | 140 | — | |
| 1951 | #733 | 142 | — | |
| 1950 | #751 | 132 | — | |
| 1949 | #742 | 133 | — | |
| 1948 | #660 | 160 | — | |
| 1947 | #775 | 123 | — | |
| 1946 | #703 | 131 | — | |
| 1945 | #610 | 141 | — | |
| 1944 | #741 | 105 | — | |
| 1943 | #676 | 126 | — | |
| 1942 | #743 | 103 | — | |
| 1941 | #748 | 91 | #3,133 | 6 |
| 1940 | #741 | 86 | — | |
| 1939 | #666 | 104 | — | |
| 1938 | #698 | 97 | — | |
| 1937 | #657 | 107 | — | |
| 1936 | #683 | 95 | #3,147 | 6 |
| 1935 | #592 | 120 | — | |
| 1934 | #595 | 121 | #2,973 | 7 |
| 1933 | #670 | 95 | — | |
| 1932 | #578 | 129 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #673 | 98 | — | |
| 1930 | #626 | 122 | — | |
| 1929 | #634 | 119 | — | |
| 1928 | #685 | 104 | #3,076 | 8 |
| 1927 | #670 | 116 | — | |
| 1926 | #612 | 134 | — | |
| 1925 | #661 | 124 | — | |
| 1924 | #682 | 118 | — | |
| 1923 | #760 | 91 | — | |
| 1922 | #763 | 92 | — | |
| 1921 | #837 | 78 | — | |
| 1920 | #750 | 93 | — | |
| 1919 | #762 | 85 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,005 | 51 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,002 | 49 | — | |
| 1916 | #993 | 48 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,075 | 39 | — | |
| 1914 | #802 | 52 | — | |
| 1913 | #925 | 33 | — | |
| 1912 | #781 | 41 | — | |
| 1911 | #875 | 24 | — | |
| 1910 | #941 | 21 | — | |
| 1909 | #890 | 21 | — | |
| 1908 | #791 | 24 | — | |
| 1907 | #871 | 19 | — | |
| 1906 | #845 | 19 | — | |
| 1905 | #825 | 20 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,050 | 12 | — | |
| 1903 | #896 | 15 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | — | |
| 1900 | #970 | 15 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,034 | 10 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | #867 | 14 | — | |
| 1896 | #872 | 14 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,299 | 7 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,353 | 6 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | #958 | 10 | — | |
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,136 | 6 | — | |
| 1887 | #937 | 7 | — | |
| 1886 | #828 | 8 | — | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | #692 | 8 | — | |
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Angelita! It came in at #692, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1884–1885, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Angelita is popular in 1928
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#94 · 1 in 330
- New Mexico#170 · 1 in 612
- Texas#189 · 1 in 873
- California#330 · 1 in 2,625
Best ever in a state: #36 in Arizona, 1919.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #94 | 12 | 1 in 330 |
| New Mexico | #170 | 7 | 1 in 612 |
| Texas | #189 | 69 | 1 in 873 |
| California | #330 | 14 | 1 in 2,625 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Angelita
- 1,525 spots since 2024 (#5,021 → #6,546)
- 1,789 spots since 2020 (#4,757 → #6,546)
- 1,962 spots since 2015 (#4,584 → #6,546)
- Biggest jump: 427 spots in 1896 (#1,299 → #872)
- Biggest drop: 496 spots in 1901 (#970 → #1,466)
- Debuted 1883
- Peaked 1932 at #578 (129 births)
- Births halved by 2009, 77 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 81 yrs · run 1919–1978
- Highest: 1 in 8,010 girls born in 1975 were named Angelita (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 94,545 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #578 in 1932, was only 1 in 8,272 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 13.7% of all girls named Angelita (1,601) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 36 | #692 (1883) | #924 |
| 1890s | 66 | #867 (1897) | #1,103 |
| 1900s | 160 | #791 (1908) | #982 |
| 1910s | 443 | #762 (1919) | #916 |
| 1920s | 1,069 | #612 (1926) | #705 |
| 1930s | 1,088 | #578 (1932) | #644 |
| 1940s | 1,199 | #610 (1945) | #714 |
| 1950s | 1,327 | #733 (1951) | #833 |
| 1960s | 1,411 | #754 (1968) | #873 |
| 1970s | 1,601 | #770 (1974) | #866 |
| 1980s | 1,135 | #866 (1980) | #1,271 |
| 1990s | 846 | #1,392 (1992) | #1,795 |
| 2000s | 836 | #1,726 (2001) | #2,212 |
| 2010s | 350 | #3,222 (2011) | #4,304 |
| 2020s | 135 | #4,757 (2020) | #5,557 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Angelita in 1928
Top girls' names in 1928
Top boys' names in 1928
More about 1928
girls
1,153,318 girls got a published name in 1928; 1 in 11,090 of them was named Angelita, which outranked 87.4% of the 5,440 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,107,613 boys got a published name in 1928; 1 in 138,452 of them was named Angelita, which outranked 34.9% of the 4,723 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #2,843Winfrey9
- #2,843Zeke9
- #2,843Zell9
- #3,076Angelita8
- #3,076Achille8
- #3,076Adair8
- #3,076Admiral8
- #3,357Abundio7
- #3,357Agostino7
- #3,357Aldean7
Tied with 280 names at #3,076; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.