Ankit

Last seen for boys in 2020 at #12,022

Peak · boys
1986 · 28 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
799
since 1978

Ankit over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Ankit has never cracked the top 2,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201986peak #2,057, 1986boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025—
2024—
2023—
2022—
2021—
2020#12,0225
2019—
2018#12,1565
2017#10,7756
2016#6,72612
2015#12,0865
2014#6,63212
2013#7,53710
2012#8,1589
2011#5,43316
2010#8,1399
2009#5,80015
2008#5,76715
2007#4,80819
2006#5,30316
2005#4,63118
2004#4,12921
2003#3,18629
2002#3,45025
2001#2,86432
2000#3,29925
1999#2,86529
1998#2,19941
1997#2,61330
1996#2,38033
1995#3,55918
1994#2,21936
1993#3,50118
1992#2,53228
1991#2,98921
1990#2,30830
1989#2,29229
1988#2,36725
1987#2,11528
1986#2,05728
1985#3,07015
1984#2,15924
1983#3,41112
1982#5,0037
1981#2,41820
1980#3,25613
1979#6,0565
1978#5,7725
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1978

The first year at least five boys were named Ankit! It came in at #5,772, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 2018–2025, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Ankit is popular in 1986

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMNIllinois: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMINew York: #1,180 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 24,439 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedPANew Jersey: #603 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 9,516 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Ankit, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. New Jersey#603 · 1 in 9,516
  2. New York#1,180 · 1 in 24,439

Best ever in a state: #413 in New Jersey, 1987.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Jersey#60351 in 9,516
New York#1,18051 in 24,439
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Ankit
Momentum · boys
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
Rise & fade · boys
8 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1978
  • Peaked 1986 at #2,057 (28 births)
  • Births halved by 2010, 24 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 46,619
  • Highest: 1 in 46,619 boys born in 1998 were named Ankit (0.00%)
  • Latest: 1 in 345,215 boys born in 2020 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #2,057 in 1986, was only 1 in 65,768 (0.00%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
  • 35.5% of all boys named Ankit (284) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1970s10#5,772 (1978)#5,914
1980s201#2,057 (1986)#2,815
1990s284#2,199 (1998)#2,717
2000s215#2,864 (2001)#4,324
2010s84#5,433 (2011)#8,627
2020s5#12,022 (2020)#12,022

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Ankit in 1986

boys
#2,057
28 births · 1 in 65,768 boys

Top boys' names in 1986

  1. #1Michael64,235
  2. #2Christopher56,693
  3. #3Matthew46,929
  4. #4Joshua37,542
  5. #5David37,150
  6. #6Daniel36,573
  7. #7James34,057
  8. #8Andrew33,858
  9. #9Robert31,350
  10. #10John30,209
  11. #2,057Ankit28
More about 1986

boys

1,841,515 boys got a published name in 1986; 1 in 65,768 of them was named Ankit, which outranked 73.7% of the 7,830 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ankit
  1. #2,007Trayvon29
  2. #2,007Tremain29
  3. #2,007Zacharia29
  4. #2,057Ankit28
  5. #2,057Amon28
  6. #2,057Anna28
  7. #2,057Baldemar28
  8. #2,096Alexandros27
  9. #2,096Aramis27
  10. #2,096Arun27

Tied with 38 names at #2,057; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1985
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,279Spenser#2,226 → #947
  2. ↑ 920Jayce#1,614 → #694
  3. ↑ 714Addison#1,228 → #514
  4. ↑ 649Payton#1,614 → #965
  5. ↑ 573Cordell#1,181 → #608
Fallers
  1. ↓ 409Ulises#877 → #1,286
  2. ↓ 365Eliot#934 → #1,299
  3. ↓ 322Jordy#998 → #1,320
  4. ↓ 313Trace#956 → #1,269
  5. ↓ 292Kennith#963 → #1,255

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1986 →