Annabel
#2,064 for girls in 2025, 91 births
- Peak · girls
- 2014 · 716 births
- Debut · girls
- 13 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 14,974since 1880
Annabel over time
Rank among girls' names. Annabel has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,064 | 91 |
| 2024 | #1,598 | 131 |
| 2023 | #1,802 | 112 |
| 2022 | #1,573 | 135 |
| 2021 | #1,327 | 169 |
| 2020 | #1,214 | 188 |
| 2019 | #1,109 | 220 |
| 2018 | #951 | 279 |
| 2017 | #789 | 348 |
| 2016 | #701 | 410 |
| 2015 | #621 | 463 |
| 2014 | #447 | 716 |
| 2013 | #481 | 632 |
| 2012 | #519 | 584 |
| 2011 | #539 | 538 |
| 2010 | #629 | 467 |
| 2009 | #711 | 405 |
| 2008 | #799 | 361 |
| 2007 | #796 | 361 |
| 2006 | #844 | 318 |
| 2005 | #776 | 338 |
| 2004 | #850 | 289 |
| 2003 | #859 | 281 |
| 2002 | #812 | 285 |
| 2001 | #855 | 266 |
| 2000 | #941 | 227 |
| 1999 | #1,044 | 195 |
| 1998 | #1,069 | 182 |
| 1997 | #1,206 | 149 |
| 1996 | #1,328 | 128 |
| 1995 | #1,286 | 130 |
| 1994 | #1,416 | 113 |
| 1993 | #1,485 | 107 |
| 1992 | #1,548 | 100 |
| 1991 | #1,485 | 106 |
| 1990 | #1,325 | 122 |
| 1989 | #1,373 | 110 |
| 1988 | #1,491 | 91 |
| 1987 | #1,591 | 78 |
| 1986 | #1,736 | 67 |
| 1985 | #1,562 | 77 |
| 1984 | #1,812 | 59 |
| 1983 | #2,047 | 49 |
| 1982 | #2,288 | 43 |
| 1981 | #1,912 | 56 |
| 1980 | #1,805 | 60 |
| 1979 | #2,273 | 42 |
| 1978 | #1,938 | 50 |
| 1977 | #2,026 | 47 |
| 1976 | #1,775 | 53 |
| 1975 | #1,963 | 45 |
| 1974 | #2,172 | 37 |
| 1973 | #2,405 | 31 |
| 1972 | #2,356 | 31 |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 |
| 1970 | #2,577 | 28 |
| 1969 | #2,134 | 35 |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 |
| 1967 | #1,848 | 40 |
| 1966 | #1,952 | 35 |
| 1965 | #1,595 | 49 |
| 1964 | #1,867 | 40 |
| 1963 | #1,981 | 35 |
| 1962 | #1,989 | 34 |
| 1961 | #1,666 | 46 |
| 1960 | #2,013 | 32 |
| 1959 | #2,021 | 31 |
| 1958 | #2,260 | 25 |
| 1957 | #2,651 | 19 |
| 1956 | #3,048 | 15 |
| 1955 | #2,108 | 26 |
| 1954 | #2,450 | 20 |
| 1953 | #1,707 | 34 |
| 1952 | #1,578 | 37 |
| 1951 | #2,016 | 24 |
| 1950 | #1,720 | 30 |
| 1949 | #1,917 | 25 |
| 1948 | #2,008 | 23 |
| 1947 | #1,790 | 29 |
| 1946 | #1,808 | 25 |
| 1945 | #1,743 | 23 |
| 1944 | #2,199 | 16 |
| 1943 | #1,834 | 22 |
| 1942 | #1,804 | 22 |
| 1941 | #1,355 | 32 |
| 1940 | #1,518 | 26 |
| 1939 | #1,160 | 39 |
| 1938 | #1,382 | 29 |
| 1937 | #1,330 | 30 |
| 1936 | #1,375 | 28 |
| 1935 | #1,244 | 33 |
| 1934 | #1,079 | 42 |
| 1933 | #1,085 | 41 |
| 1932 | #869 | 64 |
| 1931 | #876 | 61 |
| 1930 | #926 | 62 |
| 1929 | #828 | 73 |
| 1928 | #825 | 76 |
| 1927 | #739 | 93 |
| 1926 | #686 | 113 |
| 1925 | #693 | 113 |
| 1924 | #669 | 123 |
| 1923 | #683 | 118 |
| 1922 | #671 | 118 |
| 1921 | #649 | 130 |
| 1920 | #628 | 130 |
| 1919 | #631 | 124 |
| 1918 | #622 | 129 |
| 1917 | #621 | 121 |
| 1916 | #589 | 129 |
| 1915 | #622 | 112 |
| 1914 | #613 | 87 |
| 1913 | #651 | 63 |
| 1912 | #632 | 61 |
| 1911 | #594 | 51 |
| 1910 | #630 | 45 |
| 1909 | #761 | 28 |
| 1908 | #664 | 34 |
| 1907 | #637 | 34 |
| 1906 | #917 | 16 |
| 1905 | #683 | 27 |
| 1904 | #837 | 19 |
| 1903 | #654 | 26 |
| 1902 | #734 | 22 |
| 1901 | #538 | 32 |
| 1900 | #567 | 37 |
| 1899 | #629 | 24 |
| 1898 | #586 | 30 |
| 1897 | #786 | 16 |
| 1896 | #514 | 33 |
| 1895 | #815 | 15 |
| 1894 | #744 | 16 |
| 1893 | #547 | 26 |
| 1892 | #590 | 22 |
| 1891 | #669 | 16 |
| 1890 | #599 | 19 |
| 1889 | #516 | 24 |
| 1888 | #612 | 17 |
| 1887 | #633 | 13 |
| 1886 | #572 | 15 |
| 1885 | #695 | 10 |
| 1884 | #640 | 11 |
| 1883 | #692 | 8 |
| 1882 | #596 | 10 |
| 1881 | #740 | 6 |
| 1880 | #466 | 13 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Annabel was already there! It came in at #466, and was given to 13 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 7 girls a year got the name.
Where Annabel is popular in 1932
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Minnesota#343 · 1 in 3,872
- West Virginia#364 · 1 in 3,509
- Oklahoma#456 · 1 in 4,393
- Pennsylvania#593 · 1 in 14,846
- New York#676 · 1 in 17,620
Best ever in a state: #133 in District of Columbia, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | #343 | 5 | 1 in 3,872 |
| West Virginia | #364 | 5 | 1 in 3,509 |
| Oklahoma | #456 | 5 | 1 in 4,393 |
| Pennsylvania | #593 | 5 | 1 in 14,846 |
| New York | #676 | 5 | 1 in 17,620 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Annabel
- 466 spots since 2024 (#1,598 → #2,064)
- 850 spots since 2020 (#1,214 → #2,064)
- 1,443 spots since 2015 (#621 → #2,064)
- Biggest jump: 301 spots in 1896 (#815 → #514)
- Biggest drop: 274 spots in 1881 (#466 → #740)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2014 at #447 (716 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 72 yrs · run 1880–1932
- Highest: 1 in 2,495 girls born in 2014 were named Annabel (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 17,662 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 31.1% of all girls named Annabel (4,657) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 127 | #466 (1880) | #616 |
| 1890s | 217 | #514 (1896) | #648 |
| 1900s | 275 | #538 (1901) | #699 |
| 1910s | 922 | #589 (1916) | #621 |
| 1920s | 1,087 | #628 (1920) | #707 |
| 1930s | 429 | #869 (1932) | #1,133 |
| 1940s | 243 | #1,355 (1941) | #1,798 |
| 1950s | 261 | #1,578 (1952) | #2,156 |
| 1960s | 374 | #1,595 (1965) | #1,934 |
| 1970s | 403 | #1,775 (1976) | #2,159 |
| 1980s | 690 | #1,373 (1989) | #1,762 |
| 1990s | 1,332 | #1,044 (1999) | #1,319 |
| 2000s | 3,131 | #711 (2009) | #824 |
| 2010s | 4,657 | #447 (2014) | #679 |
| 2020s | 826 | #1,214 (2020) | #1,596 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Annabel in 1932
Top girls' names in 1932
More about 1932
girls
1,067,148 girls got a published name in 1932; 1 in 16,674 of them was named Annabel, which outranked 83.0% of the 5,098 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).