Annabella
#1,352 for girls in 2025, 163 births
- Peak · girls
- 2014 · 1,280 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 15,007since 1912
Annabella over time
Rank among girls' names. Annabella has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,352 | 163 |
| 2024 | #1,317 | 174 |
| 2023 | #1,205 | 198 |
| 2022 | #1,206 | 200 |
| 2021 | #1,006 | 254 |
| 2020 | #847 | 322 |
| 2019 | #644 | 451 |
| 2018 | #590 | 518 |
| 2017 | #466 | 673 |
| 2016 | #431 | 753 |
| 2015 | #395 | 826 |
| 2014 | #256 | 1,280 |
| 2013 | #273 | 1,172 |
| 2012 | #307 | 1,039 |
| 2011 | #327 | 967 |
| 2010 | #310 | 1,032 |
| 2009 | #460 | 674 |
| 2008 | #587 | 528 |
| 2007 | #563 | 535 |
| 2006 | #561 | 523 |
| 2005 | #688 | 403 |
| 2004 | #725 | 368 |
| 2003 | #709 | 368 |
| 2002 | #715 | 347 |
| 2001 | #966 | 225 |
| 2000 | #1,270 | 153 |
| 1999 | #1,258 | 147 |
| 1998 | #1,762 | 89 |
| 1997 | #2,309 | 58 |
| 1996 | #3,429 | 33 |
| 1995 | #3,087 | 37 |
| 1994 | #3,790 | 28 |
| 1993 | #3,987 | 26 |
| 1992 | #6,008 | 15 |
| 1991 | #5,949 | 15 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 |
| 1988 | #11,798 | 5 |
| 1987 | — | |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | — | |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | #10,210 | 5 |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | #7,296 | 7 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 |
| 1973 | #6,666 | 7 |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | #6,617 | 6 |
| 1968 | #5,147 | 8 |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,355 | 10 |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 |
| 1948 | #4,651 | 6 |
| 1947 | #4,007 | 8 |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | #3,493 | 8 |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,096 | 16 |
| 1940 | #2,109 | 15 |
| 1939 | #2,206 | 14 |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | #3,497 | 7 |
| 1930 | #2,306 | 14 |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 |
| 1928 | #2,768 | 11 |
| 1927 | #1,935 | 20 |
| 1926 | #2,351 | 15 |
| 1925 | #2,778 | 12 |
| 1924 | #2,809 | 12 |
| 1923 | #2,732 | 12 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 |
| 1920 | #3,598 | 8 |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 |
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 |
| 1917 | #4,083 | 6 |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | #2,979 | 5 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Annabella! It came in at #2,979, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1912–1916, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Annabella is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#228 · 1 in 1,052
- Florida#241 · 1 in 1,126
- West Virginia#250 · 1 in 873
- Idaho#281 · 1 in 920
- Massachusetts#296 · 1 in 1,341
Best ever in a state: #77 in Rhode Island, 2014.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #228 | 40 | 1 in 1,052 |
| Florida | #241 | 77 | 1 in 1,126 |
| West Virginia | #250 | 7 | 1 in 873 |
| Idaho | #281 | 7 | 1 in 920 |
| Massachusetts | #296 | 19 | 1 in 1,341 |
| Ohio | #334 | 34 | 1 in 1,531 |
| South Carolina | #337 | 13 | 1 in 1,374 |
| Kentucky | #343 | 13 | 1 in 1,405 |
| Arizona | #344 | 21 | 1 in 1,473 |
| Pennsylvania | #365 | 31 | 1 in 1,673 |
| Nevada | #368 | 8 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Virginia | #372 | 22 | 1 in 1,688 |
| Oregon | #381 | 10 | 1 in 1,520 |
| Connecticut | #394 | 7 | 1 in 1,761 |
| North Carolina | #416 | 24 | 1 in 1,888 |
| New York | #430 | 43 | 1 in 2,089 |
| Nebraska | #434 | 5 | 1 in 1,618 |
| California | #446 | 92 | 1 in 2,214 |
| Iowa | #447 | 7 | 1 in 1,857 |
| Kansas | #450 | 7 | 1 in 1,801 |
| Oklahoma | #453 | 9 | 1 in 1,866 |
| New Jersey | #460 | 17 | 1 in 2,152 |
| Washington | #461 | 15 | 1 in 2,143 |
| Indiana | #471 | 14 | 1 in 2,164 |
| Maryland | #487 | 11 | 1 in 2,186 |
| Colorado | #488 | 11 | 1 in 2,142 |
| Alabama | #489 | 9 | 1 in 2,153 |
| Tennessee | #496 | 14 | 1 in 2,217 |
| Georgia | #508 | 20 | 1 in 2,402 |
| Mississippi | #553 | 5 | 1 in 2,219 |
| Wisconsin | #558 | 9 | 1 in 2,589 |
| Illinois | #564 | 21 | 1 in 2,744 |
| Texas | #575 | 57 | 1 in 2,935 |
| Missouri | #603 | 9 | 1 in 3,014 |
| Louisiana | #668 | 7 | 1 in 2,998 |
| Minnesota | #768 | 6 | 1 in 4,090 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Annabella
- 35 spots since 2024 (#1,317 → #1,352)
- 505 spots since 2020 (#847 → #1,352)
- 957 spots since 2015 (#395 → #1,352)
- Biggest jump: 304 spots in 2001 (#1,270 → #966)
- Biggest drop: 203 spots in 2020 (#644 → #847)
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 2014 at #256 (1,280 births)
- Births halved by 2018, 4 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 20 yrs · run 2001–2020
- Highest: 1 in 1,396 girls born in 2014 were named Annabella (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,861 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 58.0% of all girls named Annabella (8,711) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 22 | #2,979 (1912) | #4,042 |
| 1920s | 119 | #1,935 (1927) | #2,847 |
| 1930s | 50 | #2,206 (1939) | #3,444 |
| 1940s | 71 | #2,096 (1941) | #3,361 |
| 1950s | 32 | #4,315 (1950) | #4,954 |
| 1960s | 48 | #4,355 (1964) | #5,674 |
| 1970s | 39 | #5,984 (1975) | #7,720 |
| 1980s | 26 | #8,037 (1989) | #9,522 |
| 1990s | 454 | #1,258 (1999) | #4,299 |
| 2000s | 4,124 | #460 (2009) | #724 |
| 2010s | 8,711 | #256 (2014) | #400 |
| 2020s | 1,311 | #847 (2020) | #1,156 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Annabella in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 2,353 of them was named Annabella, which outranked 97.7% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.