Annaleigh
- #2,194 for girls in 2025, 84 births
- Peak · girls
- 2014 · 195 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 2,842since 1985
Annaleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Annaleigh has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,194 | 84 |
| 2024 | #1,966 | 100 |
| 2023 | #2,090 | 92 |
| 2022 | #1,844 | 110 |
| 2021 | #1,897 | 104 |
| 2020 | #1,623 | 128 |
| 2019 | #1,340 | 170 |
| 2018 | #1,623 | 131 |
| 2017 | #1,340 | 173 |
| 2016 | #1,286 | 187 |
| 2015 | #1,329 | 178 |
| 2014 | #1,244 | 195 |
| 2013 | #1,408 | 162 |
| 2012 | #1,379 | 169 |
| 2011 | #1,469 | 152 |
| 2010 | #1,633 | 131 |
| 2009 | #1,528 | 148 |
| 2008 | #2,663 | 69 |
| 2007 | #3,531 | 46 |
| 2006 | #3,854 | 39 |
| 2005 | #4,581 | 29 |
| 2004 | #5,208 | 24 |
| 2003 | #4,220 | 31 |
| 2002 | #5,444 | 21 |
| 2001 | #4,834 | 24 |
| 2000 | #5,705 | 19 |
| 1999 | #5,896 | 17 |
| 1998 | #6,719 | 14 |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 |
| 1996 | #6,723 | 13 |
| 1995 | #6,257 | 14 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 |
| 1993 | #7,498 | 11 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 |
| 1991 | #10,271 | 7 |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 |
| 1987 | — | |
| 1986 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | — | |
| 1981 | — | |
| 1980 | — | |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | — | |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | — | |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | — | |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | — | |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | — | |
| 1951 | — | |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | — | |
| 1946 | — | |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | — | |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | — | |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five girls were named Annaleigh! It came in at #8,318, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1986–1987, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Annaleigh is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alabama#633 · 1 in 2,617
- North Carolina#1,057 · 1 in 5,810
- Ohio#1,271 · 1 in 7,878
- Georgia#1,358 · 1 in 7,535
- Florida#1,887 · 1 in 14,460
Best ever in a state: #368 in South Carolina, 2015.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #633 | 7 | 1 in 2,617 |
| North Carolina | #1,057 | 8 | 1 in 5,810 |
| Ohio | #1,271 | 6 | 1 in 7,878 |
| Georgia | #1,358 | 6 | 1 in 7,535 |
| Florida | #1,887 | 6 | 1 in 14,460 |
| Texas | #2,038 | 10 | 1 in 16,054 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Annaleigh
- 571 spots since 2020 (#1,623 → #2,194)
- Debuted 1985
- Peaked 2014 at #1,244 (195 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 9 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
- Highest: 1 in 9,161 girls born in 2014 were named Annaleigh (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,134 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 58.0% of all girls named Annaleigh (1,648) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 19 | #8,318 (1985) | #9,975 |
| 1990s | 107 | #5,896 (1999) | #8,496 |
| 2000s | 450 | #1,528 (2009) | #4,157 |
| 2010s | 1,648 | #1,244 (2014) | #1,405 |
| 2020s | 618 | #1,623 (2020) | #1,936 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Annaleigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: