Antonella
#284 for girls in 2025, 1,087 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #12,330
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2024 · 1,333 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 10,571since 1954
Antonella over time
Rank among girls' names. Antonella has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #284 | 1,087 | — | |
| 2024 | #233 | 1,333 | — | |
| 2023 | #288 | 1,093 | — | |
| 2022 | #436 | 721 | #12,330 | 5 |
| 2021 | #548 | 557 | — | |
| 2020 | #558 | 526 | — | |
| 2019 | #543 | 564 | — | |
| 2018 | #470 | 665 | — | |
| 2017 | #630 | 468 | — | |
| 2016 | #768 | 370 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,018 | 262 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,147 | 217 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,152 | 208 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,374 | 170 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,261 | 189 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,357 | 172 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,492 | 153 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,415 | 168 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,537 | 149 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,815 | 62 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,457 | 71 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,620 | 63 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,260 | 75 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,709 | 56 | — | |
| 2001 | #3,198 | 43 | — | |
| 2000 | #3,886 | 32 | — | |
| 1999 | #3,639 | 33 | — | |
| 1998 | #3,497 | 34 | — | |
| 1997 | #3,036 | 39 | — | |
| 1996 | #2,510 | 50 | — | |
| 1995 | #3,492 | 31 | — | |
| 1994 | #3,448 | 32 | — | |
| 1993 | #4,100 | 25 | — | |
| 1992 | #5,267 | 18 | — | |
| 1991 | #4,329 | 23 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,436 | 31 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,784 | 26 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,690 | 25 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,983 | 21 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,973 | 31 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,704 | 35 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,726 | 21 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,853 | 30 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,901 | 31 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,986 | 29 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,997 | 28 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,629 | 32 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,715 | 30 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,602 | 30 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,877 | 48 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,290 | 34 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,171 | 36 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,920 | 43 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,107 | 39 | — | |
| 1970 | #3,030 | 22 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,515 | 27 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,482 | 25 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,211 | 16 | — | |
| 1966 | #3,148 | 16 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,538 | 23 | — | |
| 1964 | #3,692 | 13 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,635 | 13 | — | |
| 1962 | #5,293 | 7 | — | |
| 1961 | #5,309 | 7 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | — | |
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Antonella! It came in at #5,753, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1954–1960, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Antonella is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Utah#686 · 1 in 3,680
- Florida#820 · 1 in 5,357
- New York#1,393 · 1 in 10,564
- California#2,050 · 1 in 20,947
Best ever in a state: #48 in Florida, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #686 | 5 | 1 in 3,680 |
| Florida | #820 | 16 | 1 in 5,357 |
| New York | #1,393 | 9 | 1 in 10,564 |
| California | #2,050 | 11 | 1 in 20,947 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Antonella
- 51 spots since 2024 (#233 → #284)
- 274 spots since 2020 (#558 → #284)
- 734 spots since 2015 (#1,018 → #284)
- Biggest jump: 250 spots in 2016 (#1,018 → #768)
- Biggest drop: 73 spots in 2019 (#470 → #543)
- Debuted 1954
- Peaked 2024 at #233 (1,333 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 10 yrs · run 2016–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,215 girls born in 2024 were named Antonella (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 1,479 girls born in 2025 (0.07%)
- 50.3% of all girls named Antonella (5,317) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 5 | #5,753 (1954) | #5,753 |
| 1960s | 147 | #2,482 (1968) | #3,536 |
| 1970s | 342 | #1,877 (1975) | #2,434 |
| 1980s | 287 | #2,486 (1980) | #3,209 |
| 1990s | 316 | #2,510 (1996) | #3,675 |
| 2000s | 872 | #1,415 (2008) | #2,439 |
| 2010s | 3,285 | #470 (2018) | #972 |
| 2020s | 5,317 | #233 (2024) | #391 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Antonella in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 26,026 of them was named Antonella, which outranked 87.2% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,436Yamile72
- #2,436Yanet72
- #2,436Yanira72
- #2,457Antonella71
- #2,457Adelle71
- #2,457Adisyn71
- #2,457Analy71
- #2,482Annalyse70
- #2,482Baleigh70
- #2,482Damia70
Tied with 24 names at #2,457; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.