Antonio
Last seen for girls in 2018 at #15,682 · #176 for boys in 2025, 2,058 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1976 · 3,774 births
- Debut · boys
- 26 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 36 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 262,995since 1880
Antonio over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #176 | 2,058 | |
| 2024 | — | #180 | 2,058 | |
| 2023 | — | #179 | 2,035 | |
| 2022 | — | #176 | 2,147 | |
| 2021 | — | #178 | 2,182 | |
| 2020 | — | #180 | 2,139 | |
| 2019 | — | #170 | 2,299 | |
| 2018 | #15,682 | 5 | #163 | 2,373 |
| 2017 | — | #158 | 2,489 | |
| 2016 | — | #159 | 2,561 | |
| 2015 | — | #152 | 2,730 | |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #139 | 2,898 |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | #127 | 3,027 |
| 2012 | — | #119 | 3,117 | |
| 2011 | — | #118 | 3,319 | |
| 2010 | #10,451 | 10 | #109 | 3,530 |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | #105 | 3,916 |
| 2008 | #15,405 | 6 | #102 | 4,378 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #95 | 4,645 |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | #94 | 4,697 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #92 | 4,694 |
| 2004 | #7,828 | 14 | #93 | 4,843 |
| 2003 | #6,885 | 16 | #92 | 4,717 |
| 2002 | #12,187 | 7 | #85 | 4,730 |
| 2001 | #7,317 | 14 | #85 | 4,736 |
| 2000 | #6,208 | 17 | #82 | 4,892 |
| 1999 | #5,896 | 17 | #80 | 5,027 |
| 1998 | #6,360 | 15 | #79 | 4,943 |
| 1997 | #5,010 | 20 | #75 | 5,069 |
| 1996 | #6,392 | 14 | #80 | 4,866 |
| 1995 | #5,439 | 17 | #85 | 4,340 |
| 1994 | #4,016 | 26 | #88 | 4,173 |
| 1993 | #3,221 | 35 | #89 | 4,301 |
| 1992 | #3,581 | 30 | #85 | 4,344 |
| 1991 | #2,935 | 39 | #79 | 4,616 |
| 1990 | #3,364 | 32 | #77 | 4,867 |
| 1989 | #2,658 | 42 | #76 | 4,719 |
| 1988 | #2,187 | 52 | #72 | 4,461 |
| 1987 | #1,944 | 58 | #72 | 4,421 |
| 1986 | #1,838 | 61 | #73 | 4,406 |
| 1985 | #2,172 | 48 | #73 | 4,151 |
| 1984 | #2,149 | 46 | #77 | 3,880 |
| 1983 | #2,156 | 45 | #76 | 3,683 |
| 1982 | #1,850 | 58 | #76 | 3,884 |
| 1981 | #2,305 | 43 | #75 | 3,926 |
| 1980 | #1,904 | 56 | #77 | 4,085 |
| 1979 | #2,218 | 44 | #79 | 3,801 |
| 1978 | #1,962 | 49 | #79 | 3,677 |
| 1977 | #1,952 | 50 | #77 | 3,662 |
| 1976 | #1,677 | 58 | #71 | 3,774 |
| 1975 | #1,729 | 54 | #77 | 3,489 |
| 1974 | #1,630 | 57 | #82 | 3,178 |
| 1973 | #2,171 | 36 | #92 | 2,965 |
| 1972 | #2,093 | 37 | #93 | 3,028 |
| 1971 | #1,877 | 46 | #110 | 2,962 |
| 1970 | #2,577 | 28 | #121 | 2,744 |
| 1969 | #3,318 | 17 | #124 | 2,442 |
| 1968 | #2,126 | 32 | #134 | 2,154 |
| 1967 | #2,376 | 26 | #144 | 1,987 |
| 1966 | #2,839 | 19 | #148 | 1,915 |
| 1965 | #2,464 | 24 | #168 | 1,778 |
| 1964 | #1,975 | 36 | #168 | 1,755 |
| 1963 | #2,704 | 21 | #172 | 1,702 |
| 1962 | #3,033 | 17 | #174 | 1,783 |
| 1961 | #2,957 | 18 | #192 | 1,585 |
| 1960 | #3,357 | 14 | #196 | 1,493 |
| 1959 | #2,458 | 22 | #206 | 1,381 |
| 1958 | #2,972 | 16 | #207 | 1,305 |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | #205 | 1,316 |
| 1956 | #3,910 | 10 | #210 | 1,246 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #207 | 1,196 |
| 1954 | #3,967 | 9 | #207 | 1,170 |
| 1953 | #3,687 | 10 | #206 | 1,109 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #206 | 1,077 |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #214 | 913 |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #210 | 926 |
| 1949 | #2,999 | 12 | #217 | 851 |
| 1948 | #2,828 | 13 | #231 | 775 |
| 1947 | — | #242 | 731 | |
| 1946 | #3,217 | 10 | #233 | 669 |
| 1945 | #3,388 | 8 | #230 | 585 |
| 1944 | #3,378 | 8 | #266 | 498 |
| 1943 | #3,801 | 7 | #247 | 567 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #255 | 522 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #269 | 444 |
| 1940 | — | #259 | 459 | |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #257 | 437 |
| 1938 | — | #243 | 485 | |
| 1937 | #2,940 | 9 | #256 | 445 |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | #232 | 490 |
| 1935 | #3,742 | 6 | #230 | 503 |
| 1934 | — | #233 | 494 | |
| 1933 | #2,161 | 14 | #240 | 475 |
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 | #222 | 541 |
| 1931 | #2,427 | 12 | #206 | 627 |
| 1930 | #2,306 | 14 | #189 | 734 |
| 1929 | #2,437 | 13 | #186 | 734 |
| 1928 | #2,023 | 18 | #190 | 746 |
| 1927 | #2,169 | 17 | #201 | 700 |
| 1926 | #2,872 | 11 | #194 | 729 |
| 1925 | #2,778 | 12 | #202 | 697 |
| 1924 | #2,514 | 14 | #202 | 689 |
| 1923 | #2,587 | 13 | #189 | 729 |
| 1922 | #2,958 | 11 | #200 | 665 |
| 1921 | #2,762 | 12 | #188 | 745 |
| 1920 | #2,899 | 11 | #190 | 706 |
| 1919 | #3,817 | 7 | #215 | 578 |
| 1918 | #4,809 | 5 | #213 | 589 |
| 1917 | #4,594 | 5 | #200 | 579 |
| 1916 | #4,417 | 5 | #204 | 551 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #206 | 527 |
| 1914 | — | #208 | 391 | |
| 1913 | — | #212 | 309 | |
| 1912 | — | #205 | 270 | |
| 1911 | — | #187 | 166 | |
| 1910 | — | #180 | 158 | |
| 1909 | — | #186 | 120 | |
| 1908 | — | #204 | 99 | |
| 1907 | — | #171 | 126 | |
| 1906 | — | #219 | 80 | |
| 1905 | — | #224 | 73 | |
| 1904 | — | #228 | 68 | |
| 1903 | — | #209 | 72 | |
| 1902 | — | #177 | 96 | |
| 1901 | — | #237 | 52 | |
| 1900 | — | #235 | 74 | |
| 1899 | — | #266 | 41 | |
| 1898 | — | #274 | 43 | |
| 1897 | — | #321 | 33 | |
| 1896 | — | #315 | 35 | |
| 1895 | — | #301 | 36 | |
| 1894 | — | #376 | 24 | |
| 1893 | — | #307 | 32 | |
| 1892 | — | #335 | 31 | |
| 1891 | — | #297 | 31 | |
| 1890 | — | #294 | 34 | |
| 1889 | — | #313 | 31 | |
| 1888 | — | #256 | 47 | |
| 1887 | — | #261 | 38 | |
| 1886 | — | #301 | 32 | |
| 1885 | — | #327 | 27 | |
| 1884 | — | #296 | 34 | |
| 1883 | — | #298 | 30 | |
| 1882 | — | #317 | 29 | |
| 1881 | — | #318 | 26 | |
| 1880 | — | #334 | 26 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Antonio was already there! It came in at #334, and was given to 26 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1889–1897, when fewer than 37 boys a year got the name.
Where Antonio is popular in 1981
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Georgia#35 · 1 in 166
- South Carolina#38 · 1 in 177
- Mississippi#41 · 1 in 185
- New Mexico#46 · 1 in 189
- District of Columbia#47 · 1 in 173
Best ever in a state: #11 in New Mexico, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia | #35 | 242 | 1 in 166 |
| South Carolina | #38 | 119 | 1 in 177 |
| Mississippi | #41 | 104 | 1 in 185 |
| New Mexico | #46 | 59 | 1 in 189 |
| Alabama | #47 | 116 | 1 in 227 |
| District of Columbia | #47 | 46 | 1 in 173 |
| Tennessee | #54 | 127 | 1 in 255 |
| Florida | #55 | 221 | 1 in 285 |
| North Carolina | #55 | 147 | 1 in 257 |
| Arkansas | #56 | 64 | 1 in 239 |
| Illinois | #58 | 287 | 1 in 295 |
| Virginia | #63 | 105 | 1 in 329 |
| California | #66 | 629 | 1 in 319 |
| Arizona | #69 | 67 | 1 in 346 |
| Nevada | #74 | 16 | 1 in 354 |
| Maryland | #76 | 56 | 1 in 432 |
| New Jersey | #80 | 86 | 1 in 494 |
| Texas | #81 | 379 | 1 in 363 |
| Delaware | #86 | 8 | 1 in 474 |
| Rhode Island | #86 | 10 | 1 in 571 |
| Connecticut | #91 | 30 | 1 in 594 |
| Louisiana | #95 | 79 | 1 in 464 |
| Michigan | #95 | 117 | 1 in 561 |
| Missouri | #95 | 62 | 1 in 591 |
| Ohio | #95 | 134 | 1 in 602 |
| Massachusetts | #98 | 49 | 1 in 730 |
| New York | #98 | 185 | 1 in 614 |
| Wisconsin | #115 | 37 | 1 in 936 |
| Oklahoma | #121 | 38 | 1 in 620 |
| Washington | #124 | 39 | 1 in 814 |
| Colorado | #126 | 31 | 1 in 769 |
| Indiana | #127 | 42 | 1 in 955 |
| Pennsylvania | #141 | 65 | 1 in 1,191 |
| Maine | #145 | 6 | 1 in 1,172 |
| Kentucky | #152 | 24 | 1 in 1,127 |
| Oregon | #159 | 18 | 1 in 1,115 |
| Idaho | #167 | 7 | 1 in 1,168 |
| Kansas | #168 | 15 | 1 in 1,211 |
| Minnesota | #188 | 16 | 1 in 2,053 |
| Nebraska | #192 | 7 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Iowa | #200 | 11 | 1 in 1,984 |
| Utah | #245 | 9 | 1 in 2,113 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Antonio
- 4 spots since 2024 (#180 → #176)
- 4 spots since 2020 (#180 → #176)
- 24 spots since 2015 (#152 → #176)
- Biggest jump: 75 spots in 1895 (#376 → #301)
- Biggest drop: 69 spots in 1894 (#307 → #376)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1976 at #71 (3,774 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 36 yrs · run 1972–2007
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 372 boys born in 1997 were named Antonio (0.27%)
- Latest: 1 in 830 boys born in 2025 (0.12%)
- Its best rank, #71 in 1976, was only 1 in 416 (0.24%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 17.7% of all boys named Antonio (46,546) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 320 | #256 (1888) | #302 |
| 1890s | 340 | #266 (1899) | #309 |
| 1900s | 860 | #171 (1907) | #209 |
| 1910s | 4,118 | #180 (1910) | #203 |
| 1920s | 7,140 | #186 (1929) | #194 |
| 1930s | 5,231 | #189 (1930) | #231 |
| 1940s | 6,101 | #217 (1949) | #245 |
| 1950s | 11,639 | #205 (1957) | #208 |
| 1960s | 18,594 | #124 (1969) | #162 |
| 1970s | 33,280 | #71 (1976) | #88 |
| 1980s | 41,616 | #72 (1988) | #75 |
| 1990s | 46,546 | #75 (1997) | #82 |
| 2000s | 46,248 | #82 (2000) | #93 |
| 2010s | 28,343 | #109 (2010) | #141 |
| 2020s | 12,619 | #176 (2022) | #178 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Antonio in 1981
Top girls' names in 1981
Top boys' names in 1981
More about 1981
girls
1,668,060 girls got a published name in 1981; 1 in 38,792 of them was named Antonio, which outranked 81.1% of the 12,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,265Towanda44
- #2,265Trang44
- #2,265Yael44
- #2,305Antonio43
- #2,305Allie43
- #2,305Anjali43
- #2,305Anjelica43
- #2,342Amiee42
- #2,342Carlotta42
- #2,342Cherice42
Tied with 36 names at #2,305; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,791,177 boys got a published name in 1981; 1 in 456 of them was named Antonio, which outranked 99.0% of the 7,289 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.6% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.