Apolinar
Last seen for girls in 1927 at #4,805 · #9,714 for boys in 2025, 7 births
Given to boys 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1934 · 27 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,299since 1915
Apolinar over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Apolinar has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #9,714 | 7 | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | #12,239 | 5 | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | #12,146 | 5 | |
| 2020 | — | #12,022 | 5 | |
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | #8,154 | 9 | |
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | #10,644 | 6 | |
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | #8,118 | 9 | |
| 2012 | — | #9,709 | 7 | |
| 2011 | — | #6,578 | 12 | |
| 2010 | — | #9,693 | 7 | |
| 2009 | — | #8,310 | 9 | |
| 2008 | — | #9,019 | 8 | |
| 2007 | — | #4,493 | 21 | |
| 2006 | — | #5,072 | 17 | |
| 2005 | — | #5,578 | 14 | |
| 2004 | — | #6,520 | 11 | |
| 2003 | — | #10,894 | 5 | |
| 2002 | — | #4,703 | 16 | |
| 2001 | — | #3,410 | 25 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,839 | 9 | |
| 1999 | — | #4,162 | 17 | |
| 1998 | — | #4,197 | 16 | |
| 1997 | — | #5,288 | 11 | |
| 1996 | — | #5,187 | 11 | |
| 1995 | — | #3,191 | 21 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,766 | 26 | |
| 1993 | — | #5,002 | 11 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,604 | 17 | |
| 1991 | — | #3,636 | 16 | |
| 1990 | — | #4,167 | 13 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,446 | 16 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,203 | 16 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,959 | 11 | |
| 1986 | — | #4,853 | 8 | |
| 1985 | — | #2,504 | 20 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,706 | 17 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,676 | 17 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,831 | 16 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,942 | 28 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,617 | 18 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,568 | 18 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,473 | 18 | |
| 1977 | — | #3,606 | 10 | |
| 1976 | — | #3,471 | 10 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,902 | 13 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,674 | 14 | |
| 1973 | — | #2,606 | 14 | |
| 1972 | — | #3,344 | 9 | |
| 1971 | — | #4,375 | 6 | |
| 1970 | — | #3,836 | 7 | |
| 1969 | — | #3,062 | 9 | |
| 1968 | — | #2,907 | 9 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1966 | — | #2,986 | 8 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,617 | 10 | |
| 1964 | — | #3,601 | 6 | |
| 1963 | — | #2,673 | 10 | |
| 1962 | — | #2,364 | 12 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,948 | 18 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,037 | 8 | |
| 1958 | — | #2,177 | 14 | |
| 1957 | — | #3,257 | 7 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,821 | 19 | |
| 1955 | — | #2,558 | 10 | |
| 1954 | — | #2,207 | 13 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,958 | 16 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,073 | 14 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,643 | 21 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,019 | 14 | |
| 1949 | — | #2,225 | 12 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | #1,850 | 17 | |
| 1946 | — | #1,884 | 15 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,393 | 9 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,862 | 7 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,405 | 10 | |
| 1942 | — | #2,145 | 12 | |
| 1941 | — | #1,997 | 13 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,459 | 5 | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | #2,185 | 11 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,197 | 11 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,872 | 14 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,584 | 19 | |
| 1934 | — | #1,293 | 27 | |
| 1933 | — | #2,738 | 8 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,995 | 14 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,207 | 12 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,889 | 16 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,848 | 17 | |
| 1928 | — | #2,522 | 11 | |
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | #1,436 | 27 |
| 1926 | — | #1,720 | 20 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,089 | 15 | |
| 1924 | — | #2,229 | 14 | |
| 1923 | — | #2,020 | 16 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,801 | 10 | |
| 1921 | — | #2,502 | 12 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,336 | 13 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #3,728 | 6 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | #3,516 | 6 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,082 | 7 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1915
The first year at least five boys were named Apolinar! It came in at #3,082, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1917, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
See more about Apolinar
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 2,308 spots since 2020 (#12,022 → #9,714)
- 930 spots since 2015 (#10,644 → #9,714)
Rise & fade · boys
19 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1915
- Peaked 1934 at #1,293 (27 births)
- Births halved by 1937, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 38,244
- Highest: 1 in 38,244 boys born in 1934 were named Apolinar (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 244,011 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1980s
- 12.9% of all boys named Apolinar (167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 19 | #3,082 (1915) | #3,442 |
| 1920s | 155 | #1,436 (1927) | #2,150 |
| 1930s | 132 | #1,293 (1934) | #1,996 |
| 1940s | 109 | #1,850 (1947) | #2,383 |
| 1950s | 136 | #1,643 (1951) | #2,275 |
| 1960s | 96 | #1,948 (1961) | #2,879 |
| 1970s | 119 | #2,473 (1978) | #3,186 |
| 1980s | 167 | #1,942 (1981) | #3,074 |
| 1990s | 159 | #2,766 (1994) | #4,120 |
| 2000s | 135 | #3,410 (2001) | #6,484 |
| 2010s | 50 | #6,578 (2011) | #8,816 |
| 2020s | 22 | #9,714 (2025) | #11,530 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Apolinar ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: