Ardath
Last seen for girls in 1972 at #8,292 · Last seen for boys in 1934 at #3,277
Given to girls 98.4% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1905 · 18 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,326since 1899
Ardath over time
Rank among girls' names. Ardath has never cracked the top 800 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | — | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | #4,467 | 8 | — | |
| 1955 | #3,778 | 10 | — | |
| 1954 | #3,967 | 9 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,796 | 9 | — | |
| 1951 | #3,714 | 9 | — | |
| 1950 | #3,235 | 11 | — | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #3,593 | 9 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,061 | 12 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,482 | 15 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,339 | 14 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,199 | 16 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,861 | 11 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,416 | 14 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,190 | 15 | — | |
| 1940 | #1,682 | 22 | — | |
| 1939 | #1,585 | 23 | — | |
| 1938 | #1,475 | 26 | — | |
| 1937 | #1,355 | 29 | — | |
| 1936 | #1,375 | 28 | — | |
| 1935 | #1,331 | 30 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,556 | 23 | #3,277 | 6 |
| 1933 | #1,906 | 17 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,237 | 34 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,336 | 30 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,251 | 36 | — | |
| 1929 | #1,642 | 23 | #3,959 | 5 |
| 1928 | #1,271 | 36 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,278 | 38 | — | |
| 1926 | #1,414 | 32 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,074 | 50 | — | |
| 1924 | #1,138 | 47 | — | |
| 1923 | #941 | 61 | — | |
| 1922 | #1,190 | 42 | — | |
| 1921 | #1,184 | 42 | — | |
| 1920 | #1,048 | 50 | — | |
| 1919 | #1,177 | 40 | — | |
| 1918 | #1,165 | 41 | — | |
| 1917 | #1,040 | 46 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #1,026 | 45 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,115 | 37 | #3,392 | 6 |
| 1914 | #1,228 | 25 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,528 | 15 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,117 | 22 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,031 | 18 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,171 | 15 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,104 | 14 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,084 | 14 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,289 | 10 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,043 | 13 | — | |
| 1905 | #872 | 18 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,592 | 6 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,219 | 9 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ardath! It came in at #1,596, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1957–1964, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Ardath is popular in 1930
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Michigan#448 · 1 in 7,008
Best ever in a state: #268 in Nebraska, 1923.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | #448 | 6 | 1 in 7,008 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ardath
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1972
- Biggest jump: 249 spots in 1923 (#1,190 → #941)
- Biggest drop: 197 spots in 1924 (#941 → #1,138)
- Debuted 1899
- Peaked 1905 at #872 (18 births)
- Births halved by 1948, 43 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · 1905–1923
- Highest: 1 in 16,201 girls born in 1905 were named Ardath (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 304,249 girls born in 1972 (0.00%)
- 31.7% of all girls named Ardath (421) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 5 | #1,596 (1899) | #1,596 |
| 1900s | 109 | #872 (1905) | #1,239 |
| 1910s | 304 | #1,026 (1916) | #1,160 |
| 1920s | 421 | #941 (1923) | #1,218 |
| 1930s | 276 | #1,237 (1932) | #1,441 |
| 1940s | 133 | #1,682 (1940) | #2,807 |
| 1950s | 67 | #3,235 (1950) | #3,777 |
| 1960s | 6 | #5,817 (1965) | #5,817 |
| 1970s | 5 | #8,292 (1972) | #8,292 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ardath in 1930
Top girls' names in 1930
More about 1930
girls
1,125,927 girls got a published name in 1930; 1 in 31,276 of them was named Ardath, which outranked 76.2% of the 5,247 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #1,232Portia37
- #1,232Vena37
- #1,232Veola37
- #1,251Ardath36
- #1,251Ardys36
- #1,251Bess36
- #1,251Charlean36
- #1,274Annamarie35
- #1,274Arvella35
- #1,274Buelah35
Tied with 22 names at #1,251; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.