Ardith

Last seen for girls in 1985 at #7,563 · Last seen for boys in 1955 at #3,886
Given to girls 97.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1935 · 167 births
Debut · girls
8 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
5,581
since 1904

Ardith over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Ardith has never cracked the top 400 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #487, 1935girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996——
1995——
1994——
1993——
1992——
1991——
1990——
1989——
1988——
1987——
1986——
1985#7,5638—
1984——
1983#6,7059—
1982——
1981——
1980——
1979#10,2105—
1978#7,6497—
1977#8,4446—
1976#5,60110—
1975#5,51610—
1974#5,36010—
1973#6,0808—
1972#5,9598—
1971#3,50818—
1970#3,71216—
1969#3,77414—
1968#3,45615—
1967#3,08517—
1966#2,58622—
1965#3,14916—
1964#2,75221—
1963#2,61922—
1962#2,26428—
1961#2,07032—
1960#2,15029—
1959#2,05430—
1958#1,93932—
1957#1,61245—
1956#1,63742—
1955#1,33457#3,8865
1954#1,39252—
1953#1,24860—
1952#1,11971—
1951#1,06875—
1950#818114—
1949#88699—
1948#782121—
1947#838109—
1946#796107—
1945#81985—
1944#732107—
1943#705118#3,5385
1942#605151#3,2126
1941#572148—
1940#531166#2,4789
1939#525161—
1938#515169#2,8687
1937#537153#3,5185
1936#550142#2,6298
1935#487167#3,2526
1934#530149—
1933#521149#3,6425
1932#513163—
1931#497168#2,8648
1930#504176#3,5926
1929#630120#2,45211
1928#626126#2,52211
1927#612136#3,7806
1926#631129—
1925#664123#3,7416
1924#663125—
1923#620141#3,8226
1922#624139—
1921#619140#3,5177
1920#671117—
1919#73990—
1918#73794#3,0968
1917#81671—
1916#73784—
1915#87456#3,3926
1914#85547—
1913#1,00329—
1912#1,03225—
1911#1,24114—
1910#1,42111—
1909#1,29011—
1908#1,20312—
1907#1,3849—
1906#1,5537—
1905——
1904#1,3648—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1904

The first year at least five girls were named Ardith! It came in at #1,364, and was given to 8 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1905, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Ardith is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #204 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,527 girlsMNIllinois: #456 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,874 girlsILWisconsin: #275 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,066 girlsWIMichigan: #234 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,045 girlsMINew York: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #184 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,030 girlsSDIowa: #192 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,325 girlsIAIndiana: #319 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,576 girlsINOhio: #432 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,160 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #361 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,289 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedCONebraska: #164 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 889 girlsNEMissouri: #373 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,746 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNMKansas: #246 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,834 girlsKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Ardith, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Nebraska#164 · 1 in 889
  2. South Dakota#184 · 1 in 1,030
  3. Iowa#192 · 1 in 1,325
  4. Minnesota#204 · 1 in 1,527
  5. Michigan#234 · 1 in 2,045

Best ever in a state: #132 in North Dakota, 1935.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Nebraska#164111 in 889
South Dakota#18451 in 1,030
Iowa#192131 in 1,325
Minnesota#204121 in 1,527
Michigan#234171 in 2,045
Kansas#24671 in 1,834
Wisconsin#27571 in 3,066
Indiana#31961 in 3,576
California#361101 in 3,289
Missouri#37371 in 3,746
Ohio#43261 in 7,160
Illinois#45671 in 6,874
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Ardith
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1985
  • Biggest jump: 148 spots in 1914 (#1,003 → #855)
  • Biggest drop: 250 spots in 1951 (#818 → #1,068)
Rise & fade · girls
31 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1904
  • Peaked 1935 at #487 (167 births)
  • Births halved by 1951, 16 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 37 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 37 yrs · run 1914–1950
Share of babies · girls
1 in 6,279
  • Highest: 1 in 6,279 girls born in 1935 were named Ardith (0.02%)
  • Latest: 1 in 215,104 girls born in 1985 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 28.6% of all girls named Ardith (1,597) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1900s47#1,203 (1908)#1,359
1910s521#737 (1918)#946
1920s1,296#612 (1927)#636
1930s1,597#487 (1935)#518
1940s1,211#531 (1940)#727
1950s578#818 (1950)#1,422
1960s216#2,070 (1961)#2,791
1970s98#3,508 (1971)#6,204
1980s17#6,705 (1983)#7,134

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Ardith in 1933

girls
#521
149 births · 1 in 6,765 girls
boys
#3,642
5 births · 1 in 198,305 boys

Top girls' names in 1933

  1. #1Mary55,517
  2. #2Betty31,531
  3. #3Barbara26,949
  4. #4Dorothy22,054
  5. #5Joan19,294
  6. #6Patricia18,632
  7. #7Margaret15,241
  8. #8Helen14,644
  9. #9Shirley14,320
  10. #10Doris12,025
  11. #521Ardith149

Top boys' names in 1933

  1. #1Robert54,221
  2. #2James51,112
  3. #3John46,224
  4. #4William39,049
  5. #5Richard31,331
  6. #6Charles28,991
  7. #7Donald28,450
  8. #8George18,356
  9. #9Joseph17,162
  10. #10Thomas16,508
  11. #3,642Ardith5
More about 1933

girls

1,007,932 girls got a published name in 1933; 1 in 6,765 of them was named Ardith, which outranked 89.3% of the 4,858 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ardith
  1. #516Dortha151
  2. #516Rosalee151
  3. #516Zella151
  4. #521Ardith149
  5. #522Iola148
  6. #523Ester147
  7. #523Freida147
Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,022Rheta#1,754 → #732
  2. ↑ 930Joellen#1,877 → #947
  3. ↑ 583Veola#1,568 → #985
  4. ↑ 483Sharlene#1,162 → #679
  5. ↑ 475Louetta#1,448 → #973
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Golda#969 → #1,364
  2. ↓ 322Louis#940 → #1,262
  3. ↓ 298Bebe#899 → #1,197
  4. ↓ 291Clyde#998 → #1,289
  5. ↓ 291Mariam#998 → #1,289

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 198,305 of them was named Ardith, which outranked 12.4% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Ardith
  1. #3,268Windsor6
  2. #3,268Ysmael6
  3. #3,268Zoltan6
  4. #3,642Ardith5
  5. #3,642Abbie5
  6. #3,642Adair5
  7. #3,642Adams5

Tied with 514 names at #3,642; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 553Neville#1,548 → #995
  2. ↑ 401Cordell#1,286 → #885
  3. ↑ 381Hamilton#1,286 → #905
  4. ↑ 375Delano#677 → #302
  5. ↑ 313Jan#937 → #624
Fallers
  1. ↓ 568Hoover#793 → #1,361
  2. ↓ 541Porfirio#915 → #1,456
  3. ↓ 424Rosendo#937 → #1,361
  4. ↓ 381Alfonzo#821 → #1,202
  5. ↓ 368Hillard#862 → #1,230

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →