Arleigh
- #6,116 for girls in 2025, 19 births
- Last seen for boys in 2023 at #10,821
- Given to girls 57.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2017 · 43 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 710since 1924
Arleigh over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,116 | 19 | — | |
| 2024 | #4,893 | 27 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,454 | 31 | #10,821 | 6 |
| 2022 | #4,108 | 35 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #4,167 | 34 | — | |
| 2020 | #4,548 | 29 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,006 | 36 | — | |
| 2018 | #4,768 | 28 | #9,670 | 7 |
| 2017 | #3,552 | 43 | — | |
| 2016 | #3,849 | 39 | — | |
| 2015 | #6,236 | 20 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,544 | 31 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,755 | 29 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,207 | 26 | — | |
| 2010 | #5,414 | 25 | — | |
| 2009 | #5,378 | 26 | — | |
| 2008 | #5,750 | 24 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #6,812 | 19 | — | |
| 2006 | #7,482 | 16 | — | |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | — | |
| 2004 | #9,892 | 10 | — | |
| 2003 | #6,576 | 17 | — | |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | — | |
| 2001 | #8,758 | 11 | — | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1999 | #7,239 | 13 | — | |
| 1998 | #7,104 | 13 | — | |
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #11,325 | 5 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | #10,677 | 5 | — | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #6,315 | 5 |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | #3,041 | 8 | |
| 1961 | — | #3,097 | 8 | |
| 1960 | — | #3,077 | 8 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | #3,944 | 5 | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #2,263 | 13 | |
| 1955 | — | #3,201 | 7 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,734 | 5 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,364 | 6 | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | #2,337 | 11 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | #2,919 | 7 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,309 | 10 | |
| 1943 | — | #2,405 | 10 | |
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,133 | 6 | |
| 1940 | — | #3,130 | 6 | |
| 1939 | — | #2,050 | 12 | |
| 1938 | — | #1,976 | 13 | |
| 1937 | — | #2,197 | 11 | |
| 1936 | — | #2,452 | 9 | |
| 1935 | — | #2,127 | 12 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,393 | 10 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,905 | 14 | |
| 1932 | — | #2,313 | 11 | |
| 1931 | — | #2,003 | 14 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,247 | 7 | |
| 1928 | #4,725 | 5 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | — | #2,523 | 11 | |
| 1926 | — | #1,605 | 22 | |
| 1925 | — | #2,435 | 12 | |
| 1924 | #5,061 | 5 | #3,023 | 9 |
| 1923 | — | #2,331 | 13 | |
| 1922 | — | #2,040 | 16 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,588 | 23 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,336 | 13 | |
| 1919 | — | #2,385 | 12 | |
| 1918 | — | #2,260 | 13 | |
| 1917 | — | #2,280 | 12 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,543 | 10 | |
| 1915 | — | #1,782 | 16 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #2,821 | 5 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | #1,130 | 5 | |
| 1902 | — | #1,137 | 5 | |
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1924
The first year at least five girls were named Arleigh! It came in at #5,061, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1924–1983, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Arleigh is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Arleigh in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Arleigh
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 1,568 spots since 2020 (#4,548 → #6,116)
- 120 spots since 2015 (#6,236 → #6,116)
Rise & fade · girls
93 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1924
- Peaked 2017 at #3,552 (43 births)
- Births halved by 2025, 8 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 40,150
- Highest: 1 in 40,150 girls born in 2017 were named Arleigh (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 84,593 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 43.5% of all girls named Arleigh (309) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1984
- Mostly boys until 1983, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 10 | #4,725 (1928) | #4,893 |
| 1930s | 0 | — | — |
| 1940s | 0 | — | — |
| 1950s | 0 | — | — |
| 1960s | 0 | — | — |
| 1970s | 0 | — | — |
| 1980s | 17 | #8,153 (1984) | #10,052 |
| 1990s | 38 | #7,104 (1998) | #9,664 |
| 2000s | 161 | #5,378 (2009) | #7,665 |
| 2010s | 309 | #3,552 (2017) | #4,682 |
| 2020s | 175 | #4,108 (2022) | #4,714 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Arleigh ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: