Arlene

#1,631 for girls in 2025, 127 births · Last seen for boys in 1989 at #6,229
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1934 · 3,917 births
Debut · girls
9 births
In top 100 · girls
14 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
143,010
since 1888

Arlene over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201985peak #53, 1934girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1,631127—
2024#1,796112—
2023#1,802112—
2022#1,742119—
2021#1,768115—
2020#1,571134—
2019#1,724120—
2018#1,787114—
2017#1,465153—
2016#1,523148—
2015#1,382171—
2014#1,487150—
2013#1,425159—
2012#1,452157—
2011#1,311179—
2010#1,165208—
2009#1,258194—
2008#1,104234—
2007#1,141225—
2006#1,056242—
2005#830307—
2004#974244—
2003#849285—
2002#759318—
2001#827280—
2000#798286—
1999#722313—
1998#726304—
1997#679319—
1996#705302—
1995#705297—
1994#702298—
1993#652342—
1992#616369—
1991#659332—
1990#679314—
1989#622341#6,2297
1988#591341—
1987#550364—
1986#564353#5,9266
1985#568347—
1984#543350—
1983#516369—
1982#487421—
1981#495413—
1980#520371—
1979#564325—
1978#521355—
1977#487391—
1976#462416—
1975#461408—
1974#444435—
1973#400501—
1972#401500—
1971#380605—
1970#349718—
1969#330737—
1968#324719—
1967#310773#3,9665
1966#279911—
1965#2661,054—
1964#2531,225—
1963#2451,295#3,6466
1962#2371,341—
1961#2161,554#3,6526
1960#2111,625#3,0778
1959#1991,790—
1958#1921,778—
1957#2031,693#3,5526
1956#1911,807—
1955#1751,982#3,8865
1954#1692,075#3,8275
1953#1532,305#3,4256
1952#1472,330#3,7345
1951#1342,502—
1950#1322,390#3,6815
1949#1332,395—
1948#1252,480#3,6685
1947#1182,907#3,7335
1946#1132,801#2,9197
1945#992,771#2,7437
1944#1012,714#1,98813
1943#903,146#2,9647
1942#833,331#1,73017
1941#773,291#3,1336
1940#753,257#1,80215
1939#693,578#1,48920
1938#633,894#1,52120
1937#603,805#1,40323
1936#543,898#1,80115
1935#593,684#2,7198
1934#533,917#2,02213
1933#743,185#2,36810
1932#803,109#1,92215
1931#773,217#2,32811
1930#1032,509#2,17813
1929#1052,398#2,9808
1928#1062,521#2,65910
1927#1082,563#3,4517
1926#1082,522#2,9049
1925#1202,275#4,1975
1924#1222,277—
1923#1272,090#3,8226
1922#1331,884#3,8726
1921#1381,837—
1920#1451,594#4,2865
1919#1561,427—
1918#1651,340—
1917#1671,208—
1916#1721,105#3,8975
1915#193864—
1914#209608—
1913#218471—
1912#246325—
1911#257226—
1910#268207—
1909#282160—
1908#296143—
1907#351101—
1906#325107—
1905#38677—
1904#42159—
1903#38867—
1902#45947—
1901#48738—
1900#49447—
1899#51433—
1898#58630—
1897#56728—
1896#51433—
1895#63823—
1894#68219—
1893#71317—
1892#66619—
1891#75013—
1890#82511—
1889#1,2795—
1888#8949—
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1888

The first year at least five girls were named Arlene! It came in at #894, and was given to 9 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1889, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Arlene is popular in 1985

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMNIllinois: #619 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 5,214 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMINew York: #379 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 2,486 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedIAIndiana: #656 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,808 girlsINOhio: #533 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 5,315 girlsOHPennsylvania: #648 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 6,914 girlsPANew Jersey: #452 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,368 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #276 for girls · 133 births · 1 in 1,521 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedDEArizona: #459 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,874 girlsAZNew Mexico: #215 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 961 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedALGeorgia: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Arlene, so not publishedHITexas: #521 for girls · 36 births · 1 in 3,704 girlsTXFlorida: #558 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 4,350 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. New Mexico#215 · 1 in 961
  2. California#276 · 1 in 1,521
  3. New York#379 · 1 in 2,486
  4. New Jersey#452 · 1 in 3,368
  5. Arizona#459 · 1 in 2,874

Best ever in a state: #12 in North Dakota, 1937.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Mexico#215101 in 961
California#2761331 in 1,521
New York#379431 in 2,486
New Jersey#452121 in 3,368
Arizona#45981 in 2,874
Texas#521361 in 3,704
Ohio#533131 in 5,315
Florida#558151 in 4,350
Illinois#619141 in 5,214
Pennsylvania#648101 in 6,914
Indiana#65651 in 6,808
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Arlene
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 165 spots since 2024 (#1,796 → #1,631)
  • 60 spots since 2020 (#1,571 → #1,631)
  • 249 spots since 2015 (#1,382 → #1,631)
  • Biggest jump: 454 spots in 1890 (#1,279 → #825)
  • Biggest drop: 385 spots in 1889 (#894 → #1,279)
Rise & fade · girls
46 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1888
  • Peaked 1934 at #53 (3,917 births)
  • Births halved by 1956, 22 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 14 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 14 yrs · run 1931–1943
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1890–2005
Share of babies · girls
1 in 267
  • Highest: 1 in 267 girls born in 1934 were named Arlene (0.38%)
  • Latest: 1 in 12,656 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1930s
  • 24.3% of all girls named Arlene (34,796) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s14#894 (1888)#1,087
1890s226#514 (1896)#646
1900s846#282 (1909)#389
1910s7,781#156 (1919)#205
1920s21,961#105 (1929)#121
1930s34,796#53 (1934)#69
1940s29,093#75 (1940)#101
1950s20,652#132 (1950)#170
1960s11,234#211 (1960)#267
1970s4,654#349 (1970)#447
1980s3,670#487 (1982)#546
1990s3,190#616 (1992)#685
2000s2,615#759 (2002)#960
2010s1,559#1,165 (2010)#1,472
2020s719#1,571 (2020)#1,718

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Arlene in 1985

girls
#568
347 births · 1 in 4,959 girls

Top girls' names in 1985

  1. #1Jessica48,345
  2. #2Ashley47,010
  3. #3Jennifer42,661
  4. #4Amanda39,055
  5. #5Sarah24,879
  6. #6Stephanie23,243
  7. #7Nicole22,966
  8. #8Heather21,151
  9. #9Elizabeth20,545
  10. #10Megan20,013
  11. #568Arlene347
More about 1985

girls

1,720,828 girls got a published name in 1985; 1 in 4,959 of them was named Arlene, which outranked 95.5% of the 12,505 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 18.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Arlene
  1. #564Kim349
  2. #566Antonia348
  3. #566Rocio348
  4. #568Arlene347
  5. #569Kimberley344
  6. #570Deidre343
  7. #571Shantel342
Biggest movers since 1984
Risers
  1. ↑ 7,360Kayleigh#8,153 → #793
  2. ↑ 1,675Madison#2,299 → #624
  3. ↑ 1,167Cierra#1,633 → #466
  4. ↑ 1,002Ciera#1,703 → #701
  5. ↑ 787Krystina#1,332 → #545
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,164Grisel#784 → #1,948
  2. ↓ 893Ciji#963 → #1,856
  3. ↓ 419Falon#914 → #1,333
  4. ↓ 364Alesia#969 → #1,333
  5. ↓ 362Echo#845 → #1,207

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1985 →