Arleth
- #269 for girls in 2025, 1,156 births
- #10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
- Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,156 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 6,840since 1991
Arleth over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Arleth has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #269 | 1,156 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #428 | 719 | — | |
| 2023 | #559 | 536 | #12,239 | 5 |
| 2022 | #638 | 462 | — | |
| 2021 | #962 | 270 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,224 | 187 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,117 | 218 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,071 | 237 | — | |
| 2017 | #1,131 | 219 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,034 | 256 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,940 | 103 | — | |
| 2013 | #2,002 | 97 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,918 | 103 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,619 | 133 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,546 | 144 | — | |
| 2009 | #1,198 | 209 | — | |
| 2008 | #1,774 | 124 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,489 | 155 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,097 | 229 | — | |
| 2005 | #820 | 314 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,314 | 162 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,422 | 139 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,252 | 158 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,600 | 115 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,689 | 104 | — | |
| 1999 | #2,307 | 64 | — | |
| 1998 | #4,366 | 25 | — | |
| 1997 | #2,695 | 46 | — | |
| 1996 | #5,280 | 18 | — | |
| 1995 | #13,386 | 5 | — | |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | #11,509 | 6 | — | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1991
The first year at least five girls were named Arleth! It came in at #11,509, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1992–1993, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Arleth is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- District of Columbia#119 · 1 in 337
- Texas#135 · 1 in 689
- New Jersey#138 · 1 in 634
- New York#148 · 1 in 732
- Maryland#156 · 1 in 645
Best ever in a state: #119 in District of Columbia, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | #119 | 6 | 1 in 337 |
| Texas | #135 | 233 | 1 in 689 |
| New Jersey | #138 | 56 | 1 in 634 |
| New York | #148 | 107 | 1 in 732 |
| Maryland | #156 | 31 | 1 in 645 |
| Connecticut | #192 | 17 | 1 in 677 |
| North Carolina | #195 | 55 | 1 in 845 |
| Nebraska | #200 | 11 | 1 in 645 |
| Georgia | #219 | 48 | 1 in 942 |
| Colorado | #223 | 28 | 1 in 833 |
| California | #226 | 149 | 1 in 1,085 |
| New Mexico | #249 | 6 | 1 in 779 |
| Virginia | #255 | 32 | 1 in 1,054 |
| Kansas | #256 | 12 | 1 in 984 |
| Arizona | #282 | 25 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Massachusetts | #284 | 20 | 1 in 1,202 |
| Illinois | #294 | 36 | 1 in 1,231 |
| South Carolina | #294 | 17 | 1 in 1,076 |
| Tennessee | #296 | 26 | 1 in 1,234 |
| Arkansas | #301 | 10 | 1 in 1,059 |
| Louisiana | #342 | 13 | 1 in 1,259 |
| Iowa | #354 | 9 | 1 in 1,308 |
| Nevada | #374 | 7 | 1 in 1,314 |
| Oklahoma | #374 | 11 | 1 in 1,344 |
| Indiana | #377 | 18 | 1 in 1,550 |
| Washington | #390 | 18 | 1 in 1,603 |
| Idaho | #402 | 5 | 1 in 1,433 |
| Florida | #404 | 46 | 1 in 1,886 |
| Pennsylvania | #452 | 23 | 1 in 2,030 |
| Minnesota | #502 | 10 | 1 in 2,148 |
| Alabama | #520 | 9 | 1 in 2,035 |
| Oregon | #548 | 6 | 1 in 2,175 |
| Utah | #605 | 6 | 1 in 2,846 |
| Wisconsin | #612 | 7 | 1 in 2,894 |
| Michigan | #690 | 11 | 1 in 3,248 |
| Missouri | #728 | 7 | 1 in 3,471 |
| Kentucky | #744 | 5 | 1 in 3,450 |
| Ohio | #1,035 | 8 | 1 in 5,909 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Arleth
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 955 spots since 2020 (#1,224 → #269)
- Biggest jump: 494 spots in 2005
- Biggest drop: 277 spots in 2006
Rise & fade · girls
34 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1991
- Peaked 2025 at #269 (1,156 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 6 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 2021–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,390
- Highest: 1 in 1,390 girls born in 2025 were named Arleth (0.07%)
Era · girls
The 2020s
- 48.7% of all girls named Arleth (3,330) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 175 | #2,307 (1999) | #8,095 |
| 2000s | 1,709 | #820 (2005) | #1,366 |
| 2010s | 1,626 | #1,034 (2016) | #1,517 |
| 2020s | 3,330 | #269 (2025) | #680 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Arleth ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: