Armando
Last seen for girls in 2008 at #17,504 · #556 for boys in 2025, 538 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1997 · 1,512 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 76,515since 1906
Armando over time
Rank among boys' names. Armando has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #556 | 538 | |
| 2024 | — | #565 | 518 | |
| 2023 | — | #572 | 513 | |
| 2022 | — | #548 | 541 | |
| 2021 | — | #554 | 515 | |
| 2020 | — | #502 | 580 | |
| 2019 | — | #520 | 549 | |
| 2018 | — | #477 | 611 | |
| 2017 | — | #480 | 608 | |
| 2016 | — | #452 | 682 | |
| 2015 | — | #416 | 750 | |
| 2014 | — | #399 | 775 | |
| 2013 | — | #396 | 758 | |
| 2012 | — | #367 | 822 | |
| 2011 | — | #343 | 881 | |
| 2010 | — | #326 | 959 | |
| 2009 | — | #301 | 1,084 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #295 | 1,137 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #276 | 1,245 |
| 2006 | — | #264 | 1,304 | |
| 2005 | — | #252 | 1,312 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #240 | 1,386 |
| 2003 | — | #257 | 1,278 | |
| 2002 | — | #243 | 1,393 | |
| 2001 | — | #230 | 1,475 | |
| 2000 | — | #237 | 1,443 | |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 | #233 | 1,414 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #224 | 1,427 |
| 1997 | — | #205 | 1,512 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #221 | 1,368 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #208 | 1,425 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #225 | 1,292 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #223 | 1,340 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #232 | 1,275 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #223 | 1,337 |
| 1990 | #6,867 | 12 | #229 | 1,288 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #232 | 1,167 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #242 | 993 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #225 | 1,051 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #223 | 1,061 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #227 | 1,017 |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | #234 | 952 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #227 | 979 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #236 | 986 |
| 1981 | #6,323 | 10 | #219 | 1,126 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #222 | 1,090 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #231 | 976 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #233 | 895 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #233 | 916 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #217 | 962 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #221 | 926 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #236 | 872 |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | #255 | 766 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #256 | 773 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #268 | 790 |
| 1970 | — | #287 | 730 | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #284 | 700 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #294 | 643 |
| 1967 | — | #293 | 623 | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #294 | 642 |
| 1965 | — | #310 | 599 | |
| 1964 | — | #308 | 628 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #314 | 637 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #312 | 629 |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #322 | 597 |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | #316 | 610 |
| 1959 | — | #312 | 612 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #312 | 592 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #292 | 655 |
| 1956 | — | #290 | 647 | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #293 | 605 |
| 1954 | — | #302 | 569 | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #295 | 571 |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #311 | 529 |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | #314 | 492 |
| 1950 | — | #309 | 487 | |
| 1949 | — | #311 | 474 | |
| 1948 | — | #332 | 407 | |
| 1947 | — | #331 | 431 | |
| 1946 | — | #338 | 364 | |
| 1945 | — | #357 | 279 | |
| 1944 | — | #381 | 248 | |
| 1943 | — | #391 | 242 | |
| 1942 | — | #383 | 255 | |
| 1941 | — | #398 | 212 | |
| 1940 | — | #418 | 193 | |
| 1939 | — | #410 | 194 | |
| 1938 | — | #402 | 200 | |
| 1937 | — | #421 | 181 | |
| 1936 | — | #433 | 166 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #452 | 157 |
| 1934 | — | #405 | 186 | |
| 1933 | — | #407 | 176 | |
| 1932 | — | #388 | 208 | |
| 1931 | — | #378 | 220 | |
| 1930 | — | #340 | 268 | |
| 1929 | — | #378 | 230 | |
| 1928 | — | #379 | 240 | |
| 1927 | — | #402 | 223 | |
| 1926 | — | #424 | 203 | |
| 1925 | — | #404 | 219 | |
| 1924 | — | #440 | 193 | |
| 1923 | — | #429 | 199 | |
| 1922 | — | #446 | 187 | |
| 1921 | — | #393 | 237 | |
| 1920 | — | #478 | 162 | |
| 1919 | — | #435 | 183 | |
| 1918 | — | #430 | 186 | |
| 1917 | — | #527 | 120 | |
| 1916 | — | #585 | 98 | |
| 1915 | — | #580 | 96 | |
| 1914 | — | #475 | 104 | |
| 1913 | — | #597 | 54 | |
| 1912 | — | #755 | 33 | |
| 1911 | — | #759 | 18 | |
| 1910 | — | #677 | 19 | |
| 1909 | — | #840 | 12 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #927 | 8 | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Armando! It came in at #927, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1908, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Armando is popular in 1989
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Arizona#116 · 1 in 551
- California#117 · 1 in 525
- Texas#121 · 1 in 583
- New Mexico#136 · 1 in 612
- Illinois#204 · 1 in 1,315
Best ever in a state: #35 in Arizona, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | #116 | 55 | 1 in 551 |
| California | #117 | 512 | 1 in 525 |
| Texas | #121 | 254 | 1 in 583 |
| New Mexico | #136 | 19 | 1 in 612 |
| Illinois | #204 | 66 | 1 in 1,315 |
| Florida | #236 | 59 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Nevada | #236 | 5 | 1 in 1,598 |
| Oregon | #251 | 10 | 1 in 1,945 |
| Washington | #264 | 16 | 1 in 2,125 |
| Massachusetts | #293 | 12 | 1 in 3,647 |
| Colorado | #308 | 9 | 1 in 2,687 |
| Kansas | #321 | 6 | 1 in 2,841 |
| New York | #326 | 49 | 1 in 2,753 |
| New Jersey | #351 | 16 | 1 in 3,443 |
| Utah | #364 | 5 | 1 in 3,313 |
| Pennsylvania | #497 | 11 | 1 in 7,401 |
| Michigan | #502 | 11 | 1 in 6,312 |
| Ohio | #621 | 7 | 1 in 11,158 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Armando
- 9 spots since 2024 (#565 → #556)
- 54 spots since 2020 (#502 → #556)
- 140 spots since 2015 (#416 → #556)
- Biggest jump: 163 spots in 1910 (#840 → #677)
- Biggest drop: 105 spots in 1915 (#475 → #580)
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1997 at #205 (1,512 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 18 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 118 yrs · run 1909–2025
- Highest: 1 in 1,247 boys born in 1997 were named Armando (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,175 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 17.9% of all boys named Armando (13,678) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 20 | #840 (1909) | #884 |
| 1910s | 911 | #430 (1918) | #582 |
| 1920s | 2,093 | #378 (1929) | #417 |
| 1930s | 1,956 | #340 (1930) | #404 |
| 1940s | 3,105 | #311 (1949) | #364 |
| 1950s | 5,759 | #290 (1956) | #303 |
| 1960s | 6,308 | #284 (1969) | #305 |
| 1970s | 8,606 | #217 (1976) | #244 |
| 1980s | 10,422 | #219 (1981) | #229 |
| 1990s | 13,678 | #205 (1997) | #222 |
| 2000s | 13,057 | #230 (2001) | #260 |
| 2010s | 7,395 | #326 (2010) | #418 |
| 2020s | 3,205 | #502 (2020) | #550 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Armando in 1989
Top girls' names in 1989
Top boys' names in 1989
More about 1989
girls
1,843,552 girls got a published name in 1989; 1 in 204,839 of them was named Armando, which outranked 44.8% of the 14,550 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #7,449Zanetta10
- #7,449Zoie10
- #7,449Zora10
- #8,037Armando9
- #8,037Aarti9
- #8,037Abbigayle9
- #8,037Abbye9
- #8,761Aariel8
- #8,761Abeer8
- #8,761Abel8
Tied with 723 names at #8,037; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,000,928 boys got a published name in 1989; 1 in 1,715 of them was named Armando, which outranked 97.5% of the 9,232 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 20.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.