Armando
Last seen for girls in 2008 at #17,504 · #556 for boys in 2025, 538 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1997 · 1,512 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 76,515since 1906
Armando over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Armando has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #556 | 538 | |
| 2024 | — | #565 | 518 | |
| 2023 | — | #572 | 513 | |
| 2022 | — | #548 | 541 | |
| 2021 | — | #554 | 515 | |
| 2020 | — | #502 | 580 | |
| 2019 | — | #520 | 549 | |
| 2018 | — | #477 | 611 | |
| 2017 | — | #480 | 608 | |
| 2016 | — | #452 | 682 | |
| 2015 | — | #416 | 750 | |
| 2014 | — | #399 | 775 | |
| 2013 | — | #396 | 758 | |
| 2012 | — | #367 | 822 | |
| 2011 | — | #343 | 881 | |
| 2010 | — | #326 | 959 | |
| 2009 | — | #301 | 1,084 | |
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | #295 | 1,137 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #276 | 1,245 |
| 2006 | — | #264 | 1,304 | |
| 2005 | — | #252 | 1,312 | |
| 2004 | #14,179 | 6 | #240 | 1,386 |
| 2003 | — | #257 | 1,278 | |
| 2002 | — | #243 | 1,393 | |
| 2001 | — | #230 | 1,475 | |
| 2000 | — | #237 | 1,443 | |
| 1999 | #10,345 | 8 | #233 | 1,414 |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | #224 | 1,427 |
| 1997 | — | #205 | 1,512 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #221 | 1,368 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #208 | 1,425 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #225 | 1,292 |
| 1993 | #6,264 | 14 | #223 | 1,340 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #232 | 1,275 |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | #223 | 1,337 |
| 1990 | #6,867 | 12 | #229 | 1,288 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #232 | 1,167 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #242 | 993 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #225 | 1,051 |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | #223 | 1,061 |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | #227 | 1,017 |
| 1984 | #5,539 | 12 | #234 | 952 |
| 1983 | #7,312 | 8 | #227 | 979 |
| 1982 | #7,469 | 8 | #236 | 986 |
| 1981 | #6,323 | 10 | #219 | 1,126 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #222 | 1,090 |
| 1979 | #6,189 | 10 | #231 | 976 |
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | #233 | 895 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #233 | 916 |
| 1976 | #5,215 | 11 | #217 | 962 |
| 1975 | #4,593 | 13 | #221 | 926 |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #236 | 872 |
| 1973 | #4,586 | 12 | #255 | 766 |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | #256 | 773 |
| 1971 | #6,006 | 8 | #268 | 790 |
| 1970 | — | #287 | 730 | |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #284 | 700 |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | #294 | 643 |
| 1967 | — | #293 | 623 | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #294 | 642 |
| 1965 | — | #310 | 599 | |
| 1964 | — | #308 | 628 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #314 | 637 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #312 | 629 |
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #322 | 597 |
| 1960 | #4,773 | 8 | #316 | 610 |
| 1959 | — | #312 | 612 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #312 | 592 |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | #292 | 655 |
| 1956 | — | #290 | 647 | |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #293 | 605 |
| 1954 | — | #302 | 569 | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | #295 | 571 |
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | #311 | 529 |
| 1951 | #5,414 | 5 | #314 | 492 |
| 1950 | — | #309 | 487 | |
| 1949 | — | #311 | 474 | |
| 1948 | — | #332 | 407 | |
| 1947 | — | #331 | 431 | |
| 1946 | — | #338 | 364 | |
| 1945 | — | #357 | 279 | |
| 1944 | — | #381 | 248 | |
| 1943 | — | #391 | 242 | |
| 1942 | — | #383 | 255 | |
| 1941 | — | #398 | 212 | |
| 1940 | — | #418 | 193 | |
| 1939 | — | #410 | 194 | |
| 1938 | — | #402 | 200 | |
| 1937 | — | #421 | 181 | |
| 1936 | — | #433 | 166 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #452 | 157 |
| 1934 | — | #405 | 186 | |
| 1933 | — | #407 | 176 | |
| 1932 | — | #388 | 208 | |
| 1931 | — | #378 | 220 | |
| 1930 | — | #340 | 268 | |
| 1929 | — | #378 | 230 | |
| 1928 | — | #379 | 240 | |
| 1927 | — | #402 | 223 | |
| 1926 | — | #424 | 203 | |
| 1925 | — | #404 | 219 | |
| 1924 | — | #440 | 193 | |
| 1923 | — | #429 | 199 | |
| 1922 | — | #446 | 187 | |
| 1921 | — | #393 | 237 | |
| 1920 | — | #478 | 162 | |
| 1919 | — | #435 | 183 | |
| 1918 | — | #430 | 186 | |
| 1917 | — | #527 | 120 | |
| 1916 | — | #585 | 98 | |
| 1915 | — | #580 | 96 | |
| 1914 | — | #475 | 104 | |
| 1913 | — | #597 | 54 | |
| 1912 | — | #755 | 33 | |
| 1911 | — | #759 | 18 | |
| 1910 | — | #677 | 19 | |
| 1909 | — | #840 | 12 | |
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | #927 | 8 | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1906
The first year at least five boys were named Armando! It came in at #927, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1907–1908, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Armando is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Delaware#159 · 1 in 629
- California#165 · 1 in 732
- New Mexico#172 · 1 in 623
- Arizona#178 · 1 in 689
- Texas#181 · 1 in 783
Best ever in a state: #35 in Arizona, 1910.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #159 | 6 | 1 in 629 |
| California | #165 | 331 | 1 in 732 |
| New Mexico | #172 | 17 | 1 in 623 |
| Arizona | #178 | 58 | 1 in 689 |
| Texas | #181 | 238 | 1 in 783 |
| Illinois | #260 | 52 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Nevada | #270 | 12 | 1 in 1,196 |
| Florida | #295 | 55 | 1 in 1,733 |
| Colorado | #305 | 20 | 1 in 1,437 |
| Oregon | #329 | 13 | 1 in 1,486 |
| Idaho | #348 | 6 | 1 in 1,461 |
| Nebraska | #363 | 6 | 1 in 1,729 |
| Massachusetts | #380 | 12 | 1 in 2,588 |
| Iowa | #398 | 7 | 1 in 2,260 |
| Kansas | #411 | 8 | 1 in 2,093 |
| Washington | #417 | 16 | 1 in 2,310 |
| Oklahoma | #421 | 10 | 1 in 2,145 |
| North Carolina | #442 | 19 | 1 in 2,833 |
| Georgia | #462 | 22 | 1 in 2,683 |
| Michigan | #475 | 16 | 1 in 3,085 |
| Missouri | #478 | 11 | 1 in 3,042 |
| Indiana | #486 | 12 | 1 in 3,116 |
| New York | #505 | 31 | 1 in 3,475 |
| Wisconsin | #516 | 8 | 1 in 3,588 |
| New Jersey | #529 | 12 | 1 in 3,718 |
| Utah | #562 | 7 | 1 in 3,284 |
| Minnesota | #571 | 7 | 1 in 4,172 |
| Tennessee | #587 | 9 | 1 in 4,036 |
| Alabama | #595 | 6 | 1 in 4,027 |
| Louisiana | #610 | 7 | 1 in 3,577 |
| Maryland | #664 | 6 | 1 in 4,793 |
| Pennsylvania | #728 | 10 | 1 in 6,212 |
| Virginia | #838 | 6 | 1 in 7,026 |
| Ohio | #1,158 | 5 | 1 in 12,531 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Armando
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 9 spots since 2024 (#565 → #556)
- 54 spots since 2020 (#502 → #556)
- 140 spots since 2015 (#416 → #556)
- Biggest jump: 163 spots in 1910 (#840 → #677)
- Biggest drop: 105 spots in 1915 (#475 → #580)
Rise & fade · boys
91 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1906
- Peaked 1997 at #205 (1,512 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 18 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 118 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 118 yrs · run 1909–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,247
- Highest: 1 in 1,247 boys born in 1997 were named Armando (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,175 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 17.9% of all boys named Armando (13,678) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 20 | #840 (1909) | #884 |
| 1910s | 911 | #430 (1918) | #582 |
| 1920s | 2,093 | #378 (1929) | #417 |
| 1930s | 1,956 | #340 (1930) | #404 |
| 1940s | 3,105 | #311 (1949) | #364 |
| 1950s | 5,759 | #290 (1956) | #303 |
| 1960s | 6,308 | #284 (1969) | #305 |
| 1970s | 8,606 | #217 (1976) | #244 |
| 1980s | 10,422 | #219 (1981) | #229 |
| 1990s | 13,678 | #205 (1997) | #222 |
| 2000s | 13,057 | #230 (2001) | #260 |
| 2010s | 7,395 | #326 (2010) | #418 |
| 2020s | 3,205 | #502 (2020) | #550 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Armando in 2009
boys
#301
1,084 births · 1 in 1,830 boys
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 1,830 of them was named Armando, which outranked 97.9% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Armando
Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.