Ashly
- #1,272 for girls in 2025, 176 births
- Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
- Given to girls 99.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1986 · 491 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 12,179since 1966
Ashly over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Ashly has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,272 | 176 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,175 | 204 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,304 | 174 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,573 | 135 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,861 | 107 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,781 | 111 | — | |
| 2019 | #1,802 | 113 | — | |
| 2018 | #2,084 | 92 | — | |
| 2017 | #2,184 | 87 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,757 | 118 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,823 | 114 | — | |
| 2014 | #1,868 | 108 | — | |
| 2013 | #1,849 | 109 | — | |
| 2012 | #1,530 | 144 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,382 | 165 | — | |
| 2010 | #1,101 | 226 | — | |
| 2009 | #958 | 279 | — | |
| 2008 | #834 | 339 | — | |
| 2007 | #770 | 378 | — | |
| 2006 | #782 | 351 | — | |
| 2005 | #699 | 395 | — | |
| 2004 | #843 | 292 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #865 | 279 | — | |
| 2002 | #823 | 283 | — | |
| 2001 | #928 | 239 | — | |
| 2000 | #946 | 225 | — | |
| 1999 | #805 | 271 | — | |
| 1998 | #867 | 243 | — | |
| 1997 | #845 | 243 | — | |
| 1996 | #755 | 280 | — | |
| 1995 | #720 | 284 | — | |
| 1994 | #730 | 285 | #6,372 | 8 |
| 1993 | #643 | 348 | #8,700 | 5 |
| 1992 | #591 | 386 | — | |
| 1991 | #542 | 432 | — | |
| 1990 | #536 | 444 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #497 | 472 | #6,941 | 6 |
| 1988 | #486 | 465 | — | |
| 1987 | #438 | 507 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #437 | 491 | #5,332 | 7 |
| 1985 | #460 | 466 | #5,147 | 7 |
| 1984 | #528 | 364 | — | |
| 1983 | #562 | 323 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #929 | 161 | #4,234 | 9 |
| 1981 | #1,220 | 107 | #2,338 | 21 |
| 1980 | #1,337 | 94 | #3,430 | 12 |
| 1979 | #1,814 | 59 | #4,842 | 7 |
| 1978 | #2,125 | 44 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,557 | 33 | #4,164 | 8 |
| 1976 | #3,002 | 24 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,141 | 15 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,313 | 20 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,971 | 15 | — | |
| 1972 | #5,480 | 9 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,789 | 16 | — | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | — | |
| 1969 | #5,974 | 7 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #5,457 | 7 | — | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1966
The first year at least five girls were named Ashly! It came in at #6,564, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1966–1967, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Ashly is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | #571 | 31 | 1 in 2,799 |
| Kentucky | #744 | 5 | 1 in 3,450 |
| Texas | #840 | 35 | 1 in 4,587 |
| Colorado | #907 | 5 | 1 in 4,665 |
| Tennessee | #983 | 6 | 1 in 5,346 |
| Georgia | #984 | 9 | 1 in 5,023 |
| New Jersey | #1,168 | 5 | 1 in 7,100 |
| Virginia | #1,180 | 5 | 1 in 6,748 |
| California | #1,323 | 18 | 1 in 8,985 |
| New York | #1,830 | 6 | 1 in 13,055 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ashly
Momentum · girls
Rising
- 97 spots since 2024 (#1,175 → #1,272)
- 509 spots since 2020 (#1,781 → #1,272)
- Biggest jump: 367 spots in 1983
- Biggest drop: 143 spots in 2010
Rise & fade · girls
20 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1966
- Peaked 1986 at #437 (491 births)
- Births halved by 1997, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 28 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 28 yrs · run 1982–2009
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,429
- Highest: 1 in 3,429 girls born in 1987 were named Ashly (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,132 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #437 in 1986, was only 1 in 3,494 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 28.3% of all girls named Ashly (3,450) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 30 | #4,222 (1968) | #5,554 |
| 1970s | 240 | #1,814 (1979) | #3,819 |
| 1980s | 3,450 | #437 (1986) | #689 |
| 1990s | 3,216 | #536 (1990) | #703 |
| 2000s | 3,060 | #699 (2005) | #845 |
| 2010s | 1,276 | #1,101 (2010) | #1,738 |
| 2020s | 907 | #1,175 (2024) | #1,494 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Ashly ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: