Ashlynn
#980 for girls in 2025, 258 births · Last seen for boys in 2006 at #12,055
Given to girls >99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2010 · 1,329 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 25,834since 1964
Ashlynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Ashlynn has never cracked the top 200 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #980 | 258 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,022 | 247 | — | |
| 2023 | #928 | 286 | — | |
| 2022 | #784 | 362 | — | |
| 2021 | #776 | 366 | — | |
| 2020 | #664 | 433 | — | |
| 2019 | #621 | 484 | — | |
| 2018 | #565 | 549 | — | |
| 2017 | #503 | 623 | — | |
| 2016 | #426 | 765 | — | |
| 2015 | #375 | 871 | — | |
| 2014 | #326 | 1,020 | — | |
| 2013 | #314 | 1,029 | — | |
| 2012 | #277 | 1,177 | — | |
| 2011 | #245 | 1,290 | — | |
| 2010 | #237 | 1,329 | — | |
| 2009 | #268 | 1,215 | — | |
| 2008 | #282 | 1,207 | — | |
| 2007 | #274 | 1,247 | — | |
| 2006 | #292 | 1,128 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | #295 | 1,107 | — | |
| 2004 | #287 | 1,155 | #8,927 | 7 |
| 2003 | #314 | 979 | — | |
| 2002 | #349 | 851 | — | |
| 2001 | #360 | 824 | — | |
| 2000 | #387 | 749 | — | |
| 1999 | #425 | 649 | — | |
| 1998 | #450 | 572 | — | |
| 1997 | #512 | 472 | — | |
| 1996 | #514 | 460 | — | |
| 1995 | #570 | 403 | — | |
| 1994 | #590 | 382 | — | |
| 1993 | #749 | 277 | — | |
| 1992 | #818 | 244 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,061 | 171 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,204 | 141 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,178 | 139 | — | |
| 1988 | #1,400 | 100 | — | |
| 1987 | #1,733 | 69 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,952 | 56 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,253 | 45 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,915 | 30 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,109 | 18 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,025 | 19 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | — | |
| 1980 | #7,418 | 8 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #6,385 | 9 | — | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | #5,008 | 8 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Ashlynn! It came in at #5,008, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1965–1977, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Ashlynn is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Wyoming#60 · 1 in 165
- Idaho#74 · 1 in 312
- Montana#96 · 1 in 314
- South Dakota#111 · 1 in 358
- Utah#125 · 1 in 526
Best ever in a state: #24 in Wyoming, 2013.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wyoming | #60 | 8 | 1 in 165 |
| Idaho | #74 | 22 | 1 in 312 |
| Montana | #96 | 9 | 1 in 314 |
| South Dakota | #111 | 9 | 1 in 358 |
| Utah | #125 | 35 | 1 in 526 |
| Oklahoma | #134 | 31 | 1 in 538 |
| Arkansas | #143 | 21 | 1 in 586 |
| Alabama | #145 | 30 | 1 in 658 |
| Tennessee | #157 | 42 | 1 in 740 |
| Kansas | #159 | 21 | 1 in 656 |
| Iowa | #163 | 21 | 1 in 651 |
| Missouri | #164 | 38 | 1 in 763 |
| Nebraska | #176 | 13 | 1 in 638 |
| South Carolina | #176 | 23 | 1 in 758 |
| Indiana | #177 | 40 | 1 in 813 |
| Mississippi | #190 | 15 | 1 in 772 |
| New Mexico | #194 | 12 | 1 in 694 |
| Oregon | #197 | 20 | 1 in 795 |
| Nevada | #224 | 14 | 1 in 828 |
| Washington | #236 | 30 | 1 in 978 |
| Kentucky | #252 | 17 | 1 in 1,158 |
| North Carolina | #265 | 36 | 1 in 1,261 |
| Florida | #284 | 58 | 1 in 1,478 |
| Texas | #289 | 116 | 1 in 1,385 |
| Ohio | #300 | 36 | 1 in 1,591 |
| Pennsylvania | #306 | 35 | 1 in 1,567 |
| Virginia | #307 | 26 | 1 in 1,427 |
| Minnesota | #308 | 18 | 1 in 1,445 |
| Colorado | #311 | 19 | 1 in 1,301 |
| Arizona | #323 | 24 | 1 in 1,480 |
| Louisiana | #325 | 13 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Michigan | #327 | 28 | 1 in 1,691 |
| Wisconsin | #330 | 16 | 1 in 1,565 |
| Georgia | #347 | 30 | 1 in 1,713 |
| Maryland | #376 | 14 | 1 in 1,769 |
| Illinois | #409 | 32 | 1 in 2,099 |
| Connecticut | #503 | 5 | 1 in 2,847 |
| California | #547 | 74 | 1 in 3,114 |
| Massachusetts | #697 | 6 | 1 in 4,749 |
| New York | #827 | 18 | 1 in 5,282 |
| New Jersey | #984 | 6 | 1 in 6,766 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ashlynn
- 42 spots since 2024 (#1,022 → #980)
- 316 spots since 2020 (#664 → #980)
- 605 spots since 2015 (#375 → #980)
- Biggest jump: 243 spots in 1992 (#1,061 → #818)
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 2023 (#784 → #928)
- Debuted 1964
- Peaked 2010 at #237 (1,329 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 33 yrs · run 1992–2023
- Highest: 1 in 1,338 girls born in 2010 were named Ashlynn (0.07%)
- Latest: 1 in 6,230 girls born in 2025 (0.02%)
- 40.5% of all girls named Ashlynn (10,462) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8 | #5,008 (1964) | #5,008 |
| 1970s | 9 | #6,385 (1978) | #6,385 |
| 1980s | 495 | #1,178 (1989) | #3,287 |
| 1990s | 3,771 | #425 (1999) | #689 |
| 2000s | 10,462 | #268 (2009) | #311 |
| 2010s | 9,137 | #237 (2010) | #389 |
| 2020s | 1,952 | #664 (2020) | #859 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ashlynn in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 1,669 of them was named Ashlynn, which outranked 98.5% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.