Azriel
- #5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births
- #529 for boys in 2025, 566 births
- Given to boys 85.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 566 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 4,005since 1972
Azriel over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,917 | 20 | #529 | 566 |
| 2024 | #5,443 | 23 | #605 | 472 |
| 2023 | #4,746 | 28 | #657 | 416 |
| 2022 | #5,465 | 23 | #735 | 353 |
| 2021 | #4,833 | 27 | #924 | 245 |
| 2020 | #3,676 | 40 | #1,124 | 175 |
| 2019 | #3,388 | 46 | #1,202 | 159 |
| 2018 | #6,521 | 18 | #1,530 | 111 |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | #1,402 | 125 |
| 2016 | #5,284 | 25 | #1,399 | 125 |
| 2015 | #6,236 | 20 | #1,546 | 105 |
| 2014 | #6,987 | 17 | #1,781 | 84 |
| 2013 | #6,462 | 19 | #1,733 | 84 |
| 2012 | #4,957 | 28 | #1,799 | 82 |
| 2011 | #3,999 | 37 | #1,644 | 92 |
| 2010 | #4,397 | 33 | #1,665 | 93 |
| 2009 | #5,709 | 24 | #1,626 | 97 |
| 2008 | #6,799 | 19 | #1,708 | 89 |
| 2007 | #5,230 | 27 | #2,372 | 54 |
| 2006 | #5,086 | 27 | #2,150 | 60 |
| 2005 | #7,138 | 16 | #2,297 | 51 |
| 2004 | #5,208 | 24 | #2,531 | 43 |
| 2003 | #6,299 | 18 | #2,507 | 41 |
| 2002 | #6,698 | 16 | #2,372 | 43 |
| 2001 | #6,956 | 15 | #2,562 | 37 |
| 2000 | #7,580 | 13 | #2,736 | 33 |
| 1999 | #7,716 | 12 | #3,279 | 24 |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | #4,197 | 16 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #4,668 | 13 |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #4,396 | 14 |
| 1995 | #9,553 | 8 | #6,992 | 7 |
| 1994 | #9,586 | 8 | #5,452 | 10 |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | #5,771 | 9 |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | #4,872 | 11 |
| 1991 | — | #5,942 | 8 | |
| 1990 | #12,958 | 5 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,951 | 5 | |
| 1986 | — | #5,332 | 7 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,333 | 9 | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | #5,003 | 7 | |
| 1981 | — | #5,468 | 6 | |
| 1980 | — | #5,525 | 6 | |
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1972
The first year at least five boys were named Azriel! It came in at #3,963, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1973–1978, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Azriel is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Rhode Island#200 · 1 in 625
- Arizona#225 · 1 in 909
- Nevada#267 · 1 in 1,027
- New Mexico#270 · 1 in 929
- Texas#341 · 1 in 1,577
Best ever in a state: #198 in Hawaii, 2021.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhode Island | #200 | 5 | 1 in 625 |
| Arizona | #225 | 36 | 1 in 909 |
| Nevada | #267 | 11 | 1 in 1,027 |
| New Mexico | #270 | 7 | 1 in 929 |
| Texas | #341 | 111 | 1 in 1,577 |
| Connecticut | #382 | 7 | 1 in 1,887 |
| Colorado | #398 | 15 | 1 in 1,790 |
| Idaho | #435 | 5 | 1 in 1,726 |
| California | #482 | 66 | 1 in 2,659 |
| Massachusetts | #507 | 9 | 1 in 3,002 |
| Georgia | #519 | 20 | 1 in 2,511 |
| New York | #527 | 30 | 1 in 2,814 |
| Florida | #531 | 33 | 1 in 2,895 |
| North Carolina | #539 | 18 | 1 in 2,859 |
| Indiana | #545 | 12 | 1 in 2,639 |
| Oklahoma | #552 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| South Carolina | #552 | 8 | 1 in 2,650 |
| Maryland | #571 | 8 | 1 in 2,862 |
| Ohio | #595 | 16 | 1 in 3,283 |
| Oregon | #604 | 5 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Washington | #604 | 11 | 1 in 2,982 |
| Wisconsin | #618 | 7 | 1 in 3,347 |
| Utah | #621 | 6 | 1 in 3,277 |
| Virginia | #627 | 11 | 1 in 3,387 |
| New Jersey | #655 | 10 | 1 in 3,977 |
| Minnesota | #718 | 6 | 1 in 4,083 |
| Illinois | #752 | 11 | 1 in 4,505 |
| Alabama | #765 | 5 | 1 in 4,304 |
| Tennessee | #777 | 8 | 1 in 4,596 |
| Missouri | #789 | 6 | 1 in 4,635 |
| Pennsylvania | #792 | 10 | 1 in 5,226 |
| Michigan | #829 | 8 | 1 in 5,024 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Azriel
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 595 spots since 2020 (#1,124 → #529)
- Biggest jump: 200 spots in 2021
Rise & fade · boys
53 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1972
- Peaked 2025 at #529 (566 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 5 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 5 yrs · run 2021–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,018
- Highest: 1 in 3,018 boys born in 2025 were named Azriel (0.03%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 55.6% of all boys named Azriel (2,227) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1996
- Mostly girls until 1995, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13 | #3,963 (1972) | #4,659 |
| 1980s | 40 | #4,333 (1985) | #5,435 |
| 1990s | 117 | #3,279 (1999) | #5,369 |
| 2000s | 548 | #1,626 (2009) | #2,286 |
| 2010s | 1,060 | #1,202 (2019) | #1,570 |
| 2020s | 2,227 | #529 (2025) | #762 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Azriel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: