Azul
#1,318 for girls in 2025, 169 births · #3,128 for boys in 2025, 38 births
Given to girls 93.1% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 497 births
- Debut · girls
- 12 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,547since 1995
Azul over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,318 | 169 | #3,128 | 38 |
| 2024 | #1,279 | 181 | #2,789 | 46 |
| 2023 | #1,330 | 170 | #2,575 | 51 |
| 2022 | #1,279 | 187 | #3,216 | 37 |
| 2021 | #1,532 | 137 | #3,497 | 32 |
| 2020 | #1,808 | 109 | #4,275 | 23 |
| 2019 | #1,569 | 136 | #5,153 | 18 |
| 2018 | #1,787 | 114 | #4,739 | 20 |
| 2017 | #1,828 | 112 | #10,775 | 6 |
| 2016 | #1,815 | 114 | #6,053 | 14 |
| 2015 | #1,425 | 162 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #1,410 | 162 | #8,781 | 8 |
| 2013 | #1,301 | 180 | #7,026 | 11 |
| 2012 | #1,089 | 227 | — | |
| 2011 | #1,054 | 234 | — | |
| 2010 | #821 | 326 | #8,139 | 9 |
| 2009 | #792 | 358 | — | |
| 2008 | #615 | 497 | #8,324 | 9 |
| 2007 | #723 | 405 | — | |
| 2006 | #2,081 | 94 | — | |
| 2005 | #2,359 | 75 | — | |
| 2004 | #2,424 | 70 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,187 | 79 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #2,263 | 72 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,259 | 71 | — | |
| 2000 | #4,291 | 28 | — | |
| 1999 | #4,313 | 26 | — | |
| 1998 | #7,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1997 | #7,283 | 12 | — | |
| 1996 | #5,771 | 16 | — | |
| 1995 | #7,041 | 12 | — | |
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Azul! It came in at #7,041, and was given to 12 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1995–1998, when fewer than 17 girls a year got the name.
Where Azul is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#296 · 1 in 935
- Arizona#632 · 1 in 2,822
- Texas#762 · 1 in 4,116
- Colorado#789 · 1 in 3,888
- California#814 · 1 in 4,492
Best ever in a state: #150 in New Mexico, 2024.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #296 | 5 | 1 in 935 |
| Arizona | #632 | 10 | 1 in 2,822 |
| Texas | #762 | 39 | 1 in 4,116 |
| Colorado | #789 | 6 | 1 in 3,888 |
| California | #814 | 36 | 1 in 4,492 |
| Illinois | #927 | 9 | 1 in 4,925 |
| New Jersey | #1,168 | 5 | 1 in 7,100 |
| Florida | #1,545 | 8 | 1 in 10,845 |
| New York | #1,654 | 7 | 1 in 11,190 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Azul
- 39 spots since 2024 (#1,279 → #1,318)
- 490 spots since 2020 (#1,808 → #1,318)
- 107 spots since 2015 (#1,425 → #1,318)
- Biggest jump: 1,358 spots in 2007 (#2,081 → #723)
- Biggest drop: 233 spots in 2011 (#821 → #1,054)
- Debuted 1995
- Peaked 2008 at #615 (497 births)
- Births halved by 2011, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 4 yrs · run 2007–2010
- Highest: 1 in 3,805 girls born in 2008 were named Azul (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 9,510 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 38.9% of all girls named Azul (1,767) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78 | #4,313 (1999) | #6,388 |
| 2000s | 1,749 | #615 (2008) | #1,999 |
| 2010s | 1,767 | #821 (2010) | #1,410 |
| 2020s | 953 | #1,279 (2022) | #1,424 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Azul in 2025
Top girls' names in 2025
Top boys' names in 2025
More about 2025
girls
1,607,267 girls got a published name in 2025; 1 in 9,510 of them was named Azul, which outranked 92.4% of the 17,297 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880).
- #1,309Roxanne170
- #1,309Zaina170
- #1,309Zaya170
- #1,318Azul169
- #1,318Ailyn169
- #1,318Emberlyn169
- #1,318Jaylah169
- #1,326Cara168
- #1,326Dina168
- #1,326Farrah168
Tied with 7 names at #1,318; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,708,076 boys got a published name in 2025; 1 in 44,949 of them was named Azul, which outranked 77.5% of the 13,930 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880).
- #3,089Yulian39
- #3,089Zaedyn39
- #3,089Zyire39
- #3,128Azul38
- #3,128Anibal38
- #3,128Anwar38
- #3,128Aran38
- #3,181Aahil37
- #3,181Akio37
- #3,181Ameir37
Tied with 52 names at #3,128; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.