Bette
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · Last seen for boys in 1940 at #3,459
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1923 · 1,693 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 34,897since 1896
Bette over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Bette has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | — | |
| 2024 | #8,946 | 11 | — | |
| 2023 | #7,247 | 15 | — | |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | — | |
| 2021 | #13,464 | 6 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #15,539 | 5 | — | |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | — | |
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #7,988 | 14 | — | |
| 2015 | #10,866 | 9 | — | |
| 2014 | #11,931 | 8 | — | |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | — | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | — | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | #14,959 | 6 | — | |
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | — | |
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | #15,352 | 5 | — | |
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | #13,724 | 5 | — | |
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | — | |
| 1992 | #13,317 | 5 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | — | |
| 1990 | #11,409 | 6 | — | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | — | |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | #8,523 | 7 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,678 | 12 | — | |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | — | |
| 1983 | #6,705 | 9 | — | |
| 1982 | #5,911 | 11 | — | |
| 1981 | #5,571 | 12 | — | |
| 1980 | #4,327 | 17 | — | |
| 1979 | #4,626 | 15 | — | |
| 1978 | #6,948 | 8 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,911 | 18 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,154 | 15 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,854 | 12 | — | |
| 1974 | #4,227 | 14 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,122 | 21 | — | |
| 1972 | #3,062 | 21 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,801 | 25 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,354 | 32 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,809 | 46 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,776 | 44 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,506 | 55 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,474 | 56 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,240 | 75 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,060 | 105 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,073 | 101 | — | |
| 1962 | #992 | 117 | — | |
| 1961 | #888 | 146 | — | |
| 1960 | #859 | 145 | — | |
| 1959 | #731 | 191 | — | |
| 1958 | #719 | 188 | — | |
| 1957 | #592 | 267 | — | |
| 1956 | #558 | 282 | — | |
| 1955 | #501 | 339 | — | |
| 1954 | #445 | 389 | — | |
| 1953 | #405 | 444 | — | |
| 1952 | #438 | 384 | — | |
| 1951 | #359 | 495 | — | |
| 1950 | #377 | 459 | — | |
| 1949 | #326 | 570 | — | |
| 1948 | #323 | 581 | — | |
| 1947 | #284 | 739 | — | |
| 1946 | #267 | 732 | — | |
| 1945 | #270 | 640 | — | |
| 1944 | #261 | 691 | — | |
| 1943 | #251 | 769 | — | |
| 1942 | #229 | 836 | — | |
| 1941 | #230 | 747 | — | |
| 1940 | #233 | 729 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #228 | 736 | — | |
| 1938 | #225 | 742 | — | |
| 1937 | #239 | 685 | — | |
| 1936 | #227 | 717 | — | |
| 1935 | #245 | 658 | — | |
| 1934 | #231 | 741 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #205 | 855 | — | |
| 1932 | #220 | 772 | — | |
| 1931 | #229 | 709 | — | |
| 1930 | #221 | 774 | — | |
| 1929 | #209 | 884 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #202 | 1,000 | — | |
| 1927 | #175 | 1,189 | — | |
| 1926 | #166 | 1,381 | — | |
| 1925 | #155 | 1,592 | — | |
| 1924 | #151 | 1,736 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #148 | 1,693 | — | |
| 1922 | #160 | 1,482 | — | |
| 1921 | #169 | 1,316 | — | |
| 1920 | #196 | 1,000 | — | |
| 1919 | #236 | 718 | — | |
| 1918 | #260 | 582 | — | |
| 1917 | #313 | 387 | — | |
| 1916 | #409 | 230 | — | |
| 1915 | #510 | 148 | — | |
| 1914 | #638 | 82 | — | |
| 1913 | #712 | 53 | — | |
| 1912 | #809 | 38 | — | |
| 1911 | #801 | 29 | — | |
| 1910 | #941 | 21 | — | |
| 1909 | #935 | 19 | — | |
| 1908 | #939 | 18 | — | |
| 1907 | #945 | 16 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 | — | |
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | #1,251 | 9 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #936 | 14 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,466 | 6 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,723 | 6 | — | |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | — | |
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,583 | 5 | — | |
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1896
The first year at least five girls were named Bette! It came in at #1,583, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1896–1899, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Bette is popular in 1926
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Idaho#56 · 1 in 206
- Iowa#74 · 1 in 284
- Washington#79 · 1 in 289
- Wisconsin#80 · 1 in 334
- South Dakota#82 · 1 in 295
Best ever in a state: #33 in Idaho, 1925.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Idaho | #56 | 17 | 1 in 206 |
| Iowa | #74 | 70 | 1 in 284 |
| Washington | #79 | 33 | 1 in 289 |
| Wisconsin | #80 | 71 | 1 in 334 |
| South Dakota | #82 | 20 | 1 in 295 |
| Wyoming | #87 | 5 | 1 in 303 |
| Nebraska | #89 | 31 | 1 in 365 |
| Kansas | #94 | 41 | 1 in 373 |
| Colorado | #98 | 24 | 1 in 346 |
| Illinois | #99 | 133 | 1 in 448 |
| Minnesota | #101 | 52 | 1 in 417 |
| Oregon | #101 | 13 | 1 in 433 |
| Indiana | #103 | 58 | 1 in 451 |
| California | #104 | 80 | 1 in 452 |
| Michigan | #107 | 84 | 1 in 487 |
| Utah | #113 | 11 | 1 in 439 |
| North Dakota | #117 | 14 | 1 in 449 |
| Ohio | #122 | 86 | 1 in 632 |
| Montana | #124 | 7 | 1 in 539 |
| District of Columbia | #126 | 5 | 1 in 693 |
| Oklahoma | #134 | 45 | 1 in 556 |
| Missouri | #136 | 51 | 1 in 593 |
| Pennsylvania | #138 | 113 | 1 in 810 |
| Maryland | #146 | 16 | 1 in 846 |
| Rhode Island | #152 | 6 | 1 in 907 |
| Connecticut | #170 | 11 | 1 in 1,106 |
| West Virginia | #170 | 22 | 1 in 907 |
| New Jersey | #171 | 27 | 1 in 1,129 |
| Arizona | #172 | 6 | 1 in 646 |
| Maine | #186 | 7 | 1 in 928 |
| Massachusetts | #208 | 17 | 1 in 2,041 |
| Florida | #214 | 15 | 1 in 1,116 |
| New York | #216 | 61 | 1 in 1,616 |
| Kentucky | #281 | 14 | 1 in 2,036 |
| Arkansas | #288 | 12 | 1 in 1,719 |
| Tennessee | #326 | 10 | 1 in 2,716 |
| Texas | #329 | 33 | 1 in 1,812 |
| Georgia | #347 | 10 | 1 in 3,172 |
| Alabama | #388 | 9 | 1 in 3,613 |
| North Carolina | #405 | 8 | 1 in 4,801 |
| Mississippi | #489 | 5 | 1 in 4,743 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Bette
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 1,971 spots since 2024 (#8,946 → #10,917)
- 1,225 spots since 2020 (#12,142 → #10,917)
- 51 spots since 2015 (#10,866 → #10,917)
- Biggest jump: 530 spots in 1902 (#1,466 → #936)
- Biggest drop: 268 spots in 1903 (#936 → #1,204)
Rise & fade · girls
27 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1896
- Peaked 1923 at #148 (1,693 births)
- Births halved by 1930, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 57 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 57 yrs · run 1907–1962
Share of babies · girls
1 in 713
- Highest: 1 in 713 girls born in 1923 were named Bette (0.14%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 38.0% of all girls named Bette (13,273) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 15 | #1,555 (1897) | #1,578 |
| 1900s | 108 | #935 (1909) | #1,173 |
| 1910s | 2,288 | #236 (1919) | #563 |
| 1920s | 13,273 | #148 (1923) | #173 |
| 1930s | 7,389 | #205 (1933) | #227 |
| 1940s | 7,034 | #229 (1942) | #267 |
| 1950s | 3,438 | #359 (1951) | #513 |
| 1960s | 890 | #859 (1960) | #1,268 |
| 1970s | 181 | #2,354 (1970) | #4,006 |
| 1980s | 99 | #4,327 (1980) | #7,229 |
| 1990s | 45 | #6,976 (1991) | #11,978 |
| 2000s | 17 | #13,924 (2007) | #15,523 |
| 2010s | 65 | #7,988 (2016) | #12,557 |
| 2020s | 55 | #7,247 (2023) | #10,658 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Bette in 1926
girls
#166
1,381 births · 1 in 858 girls
Top girls' names in 1926
More about 1926
girls
1,185,401 girls got a published name in 1926; 1 in 858 of them was named Bette, which outranked 97.0% of the 5,622 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 22.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Bette
Biggest movers since 1925
Risers
- ↑ 1,047Janell#1,795 → #748
- ↑ 389Madalyn#1,225 → #836
- ↑ 382Evangelina#1,324 → #942
- ↑ 379Carla#1,252 → #873
- ↑ 351Vilma#1,020 → #669
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.