Beulah
#5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births · Last seen for boys in 1938 at #3,534
Given to girls 99.7% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1904 · 983 births
- Debut · girls
- 131 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 32 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 73,252since 1880
Beulah over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,917 | 20 | — | |
| 2024 | #5,021 | 26 | — | |
| 2023 | #5,752 | 21 | — | |
| 2022 | #10,383 | 9 | — | |
| 2021 | #6,691 | 17 | — | |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | — | |
| 2019 | #4,653 | 29 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | — | |
| 2017 | #6,808 | 17 | — | |
| 2016 | #7,230 | 16 | — | |
| 2015 | #8,008 | 14 | — | |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | — | |
| 2013 | #8,135 | 14 | — | |
| 2012 | #9,109 | 12 | — | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | — | |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | — | |
| 2008 | #13,832 | 7 | — | |
| 2007 | #13,924 | 7 | — | |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | — | |
| 2005 | #10,921 | 9 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | — | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | — | |
| 2002 | #9,482 | 10 | — | |
| 2001 | #12,056 | 7 | — | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | — | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | — | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | #9,017 | 9 | — | |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | — | |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | — | |
| 1994 | #8,122 | 10 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | — | |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | — | |
| 1991 | #6,976 | 12 | — | |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 | — | |
| 1989 | #5,286 | 16 | — | |
| 1988 | #5,065 | 16 | — | |
| 1987 | #6,335 | 11 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,757 | 12 | — | |
| 1985 | #4,455 | 17 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,990 | 19 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,286 | 17 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,898 | 20 | — | |
| 1981 | #3,859 | 20 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,719 | 21 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,903 | 19 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,942 | 27 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,612 | 20 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,865 | 26 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,052 | 23 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,348 | 33 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,629 | 27 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,680 | 26 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,247 | 35 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,781 | 50 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,058 | 37 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,360 | 65 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,646 | 46 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,394 | 62 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,246 | 78 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,139 | 92 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,167 | 88 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,126 | 95 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,220 | 80 | — | |
| 1959 | #978 | 117 | — | |
| 1958 | #892 | 131 | — | |
| 1957 | #851 | 142 | — | |
| 1956 | #845 | 138 | — | |
| 1955 | #775 | 153 | — | |
| 1954 | #656 | 195 | — | |
| 1953 | #665 | 182 | — | |
| 1952 | #620 | 201 | — | |
| 1951 | #552 | 233 | — | |
| 1950 | #478 | 288 | — | |
| 1949 | #448 | 317 | — | |
| 1948 | #439 | 327 | — | |
| 1947 | #424 | 371 | — | |
| 1946 | #408 | 353 | — | |
| 1945 | #347 | 392 | — | |
| 1944 | #315 | 462 | — | |
| 1943 | #310 | 503 | — | |
| 1942 | #306 | 508 | — | |
| 1941 | #270 | 554 | — | |
| 1940 | #253 | 621 | — | |
| 1939 | #259 | 574 | — | |
| 1938 | #237 | 689 | #3,534 | 5 |
| 1937 | #225 | 719 | #3,518 | 5 |
| 1936 | #221 | 743 | #3,549 | 5 |
| 1935 | #202 | 845 | #3,252 | 6 |
| 1934 | #191 | 931 | — | |
| 1933 | #189 | 896 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #183 | 999 | #3,092 | 7 |
| 1931 | #173 | 1,063 | #2,328 | 11 |
| 1930 | #168 | 1,210 | #3,592 | 6 |
| 1929 | #161 | 1,279 | — | |
| 1928 | #154 | 1,421 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #145 | 1,657 | #3,451 | 7 |
| 1926 | #148 | 1,650 | — | |
| 1925 | #143 | 1,777 | #3,155 | 8 |
| 1924 | #138 | 2,006 | #4,347 | 5 |
| 1923 | #129 | 2,050 | #2,950 | 9 |
| 1922 | #124 | 2,097 | #3,252 | 8 |
| 1921 | #116 | 2,313 | #2,986 | 9 |
| 1920 | #109 | 2,376 | #3,815 | 6 |
| 1919 | #108 | 2,212 | #4,168 | 5 |
| 1918 | #104 | 2,363 | #2,882 | 9 |
| 1917 | #102 | 2,232 | #2,280 | 12 |
| 1916 | #97 | 2,401 | #3,177 | 7 |
| 1915 | #95 | 2,268 | #1,968 | 14 |
| 1914 | #96 | 1,775 | — | |
| 1913 | #85 | 1,641 | #2,496 | 6 |
| 1912 | #80 | 1,607 | #1,885 | 8 |
| 1911 | #79 | 1,244 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #82 | 1,131 | #1,421 | 6 |
| 1909 | #80 | 1,052 | — | |
| 1908 | #82 | 1,015 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #73 | 1,092 | — | |
| 1906 | #75 | 980 | — | |
| 1905 | #77 | 968 | — | |
| 1904 | #72 | 983 | — | |
| 1903 | #72 | 920 | — | |
| 1902 | #77 | 873 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #74 | 859 | — | |
| 1900 | #78 | 974 | #1,050 | 7 |
| 1899 | #76 | 770 | — | |
| 1898 | #82 | 783 | #1,002 | 6 |
| 1897 | #81 | 688 | — | |
| 1896 | #77 | 750 | — | |
| 1895 | #74 | 760 | — | |
| 1894 | #79 | 675 | — | |
| 1893 | #80 | 622 | — | |
| 1892 | #77 | 638 | #956 | 6 |
| 1891 | #81 | 526 | — | |
| 1890 | #79 | 573 | — | |
| 1889 | #81 | 498 | — | |
| 1888 | #95 | 426 | — | |
| 1887 | #90 | 355 | — | |
| 1886 | #98 | 345 | — | |
| 1885 | #96 | 309 | — | |
| 1884 | #113 | 233 | — | |
| 1883 | #107 | 217 | — | |
| 1882 | #112 | 190 | — | |
| 1881 | #112 | 162 | — | |
| 1880 | #122 | 131 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Beulah was already there! It came in at #122, and was given to 131 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2010–2011, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Beulah is popular in 1916
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#28 · 1 in 123
- Idaho#39 · 1 in 150
- Kentucky#45 · 1 in 189
- Kansas#45 · 1 in 190
- Tennessee#47 · 1 in 197
Best ever in a state: #27 in West Virginia, 1913.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #28 | 123 | 1 in 123 |
| Idaho | #39 | 24 | 1 in 150 |
| Kansas | #45 | 78 | 1 in 190 |
| Kentucky | #45 | 127 | 1 in 189 |
| Tennessee | #47 | 117 | 1 in 197 |
| North Carolina | #54 | 156 | 1 in 196 |
| Oklahoma | #59 | 78 | 1 in 235 |
| Missouri | #61 | 123 | 1 in 235 |
| Virginia | #64 | 93 | 1 in 261 |
| Iowa | #65 | 85 | 1 in 243 |
| Indiana | #66 | 91 | 1 in 261 |
| Maryland | #68 | 40 | 1 in 301 |
| Nebraska | #68 | 44 | 1 in 256 |
| Louisiana | #69 | 72 | 1 in 246 |
| South Dakota | #76 | 20 | 1 in 292 |
| Colorado | #81 | 22 | 1 in 309 |
| District of Columbia | #83 | 6 | 1 in 384 |
| Arkansas | #85 | 52 | 1 in 315 |
| Utah | #85 | 15 | 1 in 297 |
| Vermont | #85 | 8 | 1 in 299 |
| Maine | #88 | 19 | 1 in 301 |
| Illinois | #95 | 144 | 1 in 402 |
| South Carolina | #96 | 51 | 1 in 377 |
| North Dakota | #98 | 21 | 1 in 357 |
| Ohio | #99 | 104 | 1 in 461 |
| Michigan | #102 | 73 | 1 in 442 |
| Oregon | #108 | 11 | 1 in 442 |
| Georgia | #109 | 71 | 1 in 442 |
| Mississippi | #113 | 39 | 1 in 462 |
| Alabama | #115 | 57 | 1 in 454 |
| Texas | #116 | 92 | 1 in 490 |
| Florida | #125 | 18 | 1 in 482 |
| Montana | #129 | 9 | 1 in 569 |
| Minnesota | #131 | 32 | 1 in 677 |
| Wisconsin | #138 | 33 | 1 in 713 |
| Washington | #153 | 11 | 1 in 762 |
| Pennsylvania | #154 | 88 | 1 in 1,014 |
| New York | #182 | 83 | 1 in 1,132 |
| New Jersey | #199 | 18 | 1 in 1,595 |
| Massachusetts | #200 | 18 | 1 in 1,848 |
| California | #208 | 15 | 1 in 1,304 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Beulah
- 896 spots since 2024 (#5,021 → #5,917)
- 3,036 spots since 2020 (#8,953 → #5,917)
- 2,091 spots since 2015 (#8,008 → #5,917)
- Biggest jump: 17 spots in 1885 (#113 → #96)
- Biggest drop: 242 spots in 1960 (#978 → #1,220)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1904 at #72 (983 births)
- Births halved by 1944, 40 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 32 yrs · run 1885–1916
- Top 1,000: 80 yrs · run 1880–1959
- Highest: 1 in 279 girls born in 1901 were named Beulah (0.36%)
- Latest: 1 in 80,363 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #72 in 1904, was only 1 in 280 (0.36%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.8% of all girls named Beulah (18,874) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 2,866 | #81 (1889) | #103 |
| 1890s | 6,785 | #74 (1895) | #79 |
| 1900s | 9,716 | #72 (1904) | #76 |
| 1910s | 18,874 | #79 (1911) | #93 |
| 1920s | 18,626 | #109 (1920) | #137 |
| 1930s | 8,669 | #168 (1930) | #205 |
| 1940s | 4,408 | #253 (1940) | #352 |
| 1950s | 1,780 | #478 (1950) | #731 |
| 1960s | 671 | #1,126 (1961) | #1,465 |
| 1970s | 286 | #1,781 (1970) | #2,806 |
| 1980s | 169 | #3,719 (1980) | #4,665 |
| 1990s | 84 | #6,131 (1990) | #10,031 |
| 2000s | 79 | #8,716 (2004) | #12,318 |
| 2010s | 135 | #4,653 (2019) | #8,583 |
| 2020s | 104 | #5,021 (2024) | #7,120 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Beulah in 1916
Top girls' names in 1916
Top boys' names in 1916
More about 1916
girls
1,044,334 girls got a published name in 1916; 1 in 435 of them was named Beulah, which outranked 98.1% of the 5,161 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
890,080 boys got a published name in 1916; 1 in 127,154 of them was named Beulah, which outranked 29.9% of the 4,535 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).