Beulah

#5,917 for girls in 2025, 20 births · Last seen for boys in 1938 at #3,534
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1904 · 983 births
Debut · girls
131 births
In top 100 · girls
32 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
73,252
since 1880

Beulah over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201945peak #72, 1904girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#5,91720—
2024#5,02126—
2023#5,75221—
2022#10,3839—
2021#6,69117—
2020#8,95311—
2019#4,65329—
2018#6,79217—
2017#6,80817—
2016#7,23016—
2015#8,00814—
2014#9,51711—
2013#8,13514—
2012#9,10912—
2011——
2010#16,9925—
2009#15,2426—
2008#13,8327—
2007#13,9247—
2006#11,4179—
2005#10,9219—
2004#8,71612—
2003#15,7845—
2002#9,48210—
2001#12,0567—
2000#11,8017—
1999#12,6886—
1998#14,1225—
1997#9,0179—
1996#10,5677—
1995#8,7669—
1994#8,12210—
1993#13,4425—
1992#10,4797—
1991#6,97612—
1990#6,13114—
1989#5,28616—
1988#5,06516—
1987#6,33511—
1986#5,75712—
1985#4,45517—
1984#3,99019—
1983#4,28617—
1982#3,89820—
1981#3,85920—
1980#3,71921—
1979#3,90319—
1978#2,94227—
1977#3,61220—
1976#2,86526—
1975#3,05223—
1974#2,34833—
1973#2,62927—
1972#2,68026—
1971#2,24735—
1970#1,78150—
1969#2,05837—
1968#2,29628—
1967#1,36065—
1966#1,64646—
1965#1,39462—
1964#1,24678—
1963#1,13992—
1962#1,16788—
1961#1,12695—
1960#1,22080—
1959#978117—
1958#892131—
1957#851142—
1956#845138—
1955#775153—
1954#656195—
1953#665182—
1952#620201—
1951#552233—
1950#478288—
1949#448317—
1948#439327—
1947#424371—
1946#408353—
1945#347392—
1944#315462—
1943#310503—
1942#306508—
1941#270554—
1940#253621—
1939#259574—
1938#237689#3,5345
1937#225719#3,5185
1936#221743#3,5495
1935#202845#3,2526
1934#191931—
1933#189896#3,6425
1932#183999#3,0927
1931#1731,063#2,32811
1930#1681,210#3,5926
1929#1611,279—
1928#1541,421#3,3577
1927#1451,657#3,4517
1926#1481,650—
1925#1431,777#3,1558
1924#1382,006#4,3475
1923#1292,050#2,9509
1922#1242,097#3,2528
1921#1162,313#2,9869
1920#1092,376#3,8156
1919#1082,212#4,1685
1918#1042,363#2,8829
1917#1022,232#2,28012
1916#972,401#3,1777
1915#952,268#1,96814
1914#961,775—
1913#851,641#2,4966
1912#801,607#1,8858
1911#791,244#1,2908
1910#821,131#1,4216
1909#801,052—
1908#821,015#1,3735
1907#731,092—
1906#75980—
1905#77968—
1904#72983—
1903#72920—
1902#77873#1,1375
1901#74859—
1900#78974#1,0507
1899#76770—
1898#82783#1,0026
1897#81688—
1896#77750—
1895#74760—
1894#79675—
1893#80622—
1892#77638#9566
1891#81526—
1890#79573—
1889#81498—
1888#95426—
1887#90355—
1886#98345—
1885#96309—
1884#113233—
1883#107217—
1882#112190—
1881#112162—
1880#122131—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Beulah was already there! It came in at #122, and was given to 131 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 2010–2011, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Beulah is popular in 1945

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNHWashington: #366 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,822 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedMNIllinois: #509 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 7,690 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedWIMichigan: #458 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 7,123 girlsMINew York: #723 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 15,471 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedIAIndiana: #287 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,955 girlsINOhio: #557 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 9,955 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #922 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 16,702 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNEMissouri: #396 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,983 girlsMOKentucky: #106 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 560 girlsKYWest Virginia: #167 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 972 girlsWVVirginia: #231 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,509 girlsVAMaryland: #271 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,189 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedNMKansas: #296 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,735 girlsKSArkansas: #235 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,409 girlsARTennessee: #176 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 1,066 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #204 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 1,193 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #181 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 898 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #215 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 987 girlsLAMississippi: #226 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,110 girlsMSAlabama: #252 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,736 girlsALGeorgia: #258 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 1,719 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Beulah, so not publishedHITexas: #531 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 5,158 girlsTXFlorida: #373 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,208 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Kentucky#106 · 1 in 560
  2. West Virginia#167 · 1 in 972
  3. Tennessee#176 · 1 in 1,066
  4. South Carolina#181 · 1 in 898
  5. North Carolina#204 · 1 in 1,193

Best ever in a state: #27 in West Virginia, 1913.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Kentucky#106481 in 560
West Virginia#167181 in 972
Tennessee#176281 in 1,066
South Carolina#181261 in 898
North Carolina#204341 in 1,193
Louisiana#215261 in 987
Mississippi#226211 in 1,110
Virginia#231191 in 1,509
Arkansas#235131 in 1,409
Alabama#252181 in 1,736
Georgia#258201 in 1,719
Maryland#27181 in 2,189
Indiana#287101 in 2,955
Kansas#29651 in 2,735
Washington#36651 in 3,822
Florida#37371 in 3,208
Missouri#39661 in 4,983
Michigan#45871 in 7,123
Illinois#50981 in 7,690
Texas#531141 in 5,158
Ohio#55761 in 9,955
New York#72371 in 15,471
California#92251 in 16,702
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Iowa———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Beulah
Momentum · girls
Rising
  • 896 spots since 2024 (#5,021 → #5,917)
  • 3,036 spots since 2020 (#8,953 → #5,917)
  • 2,091 spots since 2015 (#8,008 → #5,917)
  • Biggest jump: 17 spots in 1885 (#113 → #96)
  • Biggest drop: 242 spots in 1960 (#978 → #1,220)
Rise & fade · girls
24 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1904 at #72 (983 births)
  • Births halved by 1944, 40 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 32 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 32 yrs · run 1885–1916
  • Top 1,000: 80 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 279
  • Highest: 1 in 279 girls born in 1901 were named Beulah (0.36%)
  • Latest: 1 in 80,363 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
  • Its best rank, #72 in 1904, was only 1 in 280 (0.36%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1910s
  • 25.8% of all girls named Beulah (18,874) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,866#81 (1889)#103
1890s6,785#74 (1895)#79
1900s9,716#72 (1904)#76
1910s18,874#79 (1911)#93
1920s18,626#109 (1920)#137
1930s8,669#168 (1930)#205
1940s4,408#253 (1940)#352
1950s1,780#478 (1950)#731
1960s671#1,126 (1961)#1,465
1970s286#1,781 (1970)#2,806
1980s169#3,719 (1980)#4,665
1990s84#6,131 (1990)#10,031
2000s79#8,716 (2004)#12,318
2010s135#4,653 (2019)#8,583
2020s104#5,021 (2024)#7,120

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Beulah in 1945

girls
#347
392 births · 1 in 3,334 girls

Top girls' names in 1945

  1. #1Mary59,278
  2. #2Linda41,465
  3. #3Barbara38,273
  4. #4Patricia35,844
  5. #5Carol30,389
  6. #6Sandra24,700
  7. #7Nancy21,456
  8. #8Sharon20,838
  9. #9Judith20,192
  10. #10Susan19,222
  11. #347Beulah392
More about 1945

girls

1,307,090 girls got a published name in 1945; 1 in 3,334 of them was named Beulah, which outranked 93.4% of the 5,242 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Beulah
  1. #344Diann396
  2. #345Gay395
  3. #346Rosetta394
  4. #347Beulah392
  5. #348Jimmie390
  6. #348Muriel390
  7. #350Essie389
Biggest movers since 1944
Risers
  1. ↑ 799Lauren#1,153 → #354
  2. ↑ 707Amber#1,661 → #954
  3. ↑ 648Laureen#1,315 → #667
  4. ↑ 630Deidre#1,609 → #979
  5. ↑ 623Candice#1,364 → #741
Fallers
  1. ↓ 395Bernardine#937 → #1,332
  2. ↓ 386Joella#988 → #1,374
  3. ↓ 342Venita#937 → #1,279
  4. ↓ 275Magdalene#867 → #1,142
  5. ↓ 249Alpha#964 → #1,213

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1945 →